Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendonça, Ricardo Fabrino
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Veloso, Lucas Henrique Nigri, Magalhães, Bruno Dias, Motta, Filipe Mendes, -, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6759-6249, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Fundação João Pinheiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Fundação João Pinheiro
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/123456789/4052
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000358
Resumo: This paper advocates a move beyond the systemic approach in the field of Deliberative Democracy. It argues that the notion of deliberative ecology can deliver the necessary conceptual elements that deliberative democrats seek in deliberative systems without some of the problems they either overlook or embrace. To advocate the advantages of an ecological perspective to deliberation, the article focuses on six axes of comparison: (i) performances of actants (instead of functions of arenas and players); (ii) articulations and translations (instead of transmission); (iii) vulnerabilities (instead of pathologies and dysfunctions); (iv) practice (instead of institutionally-oriented design); (v) diverse temporalities (instead of linear temporality) and; (vi) hologram-based analysis (instead of systemic analysis). In a nutshell, the article claims that the ecological approach to deliberation has the advantage of conceptualizing an ever-changing web of relations of interdependency, which connects diverse entities that are either relevant to a public discussion or that hinder its enactment.
id FJP-2_ef1c5f5cf6df6085a06c8beb0e141144
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br:123456789/4052
network_acronym_str FJP-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Fundação João Pinheiro
repository_id_str
spelling 2024-05-14T19:42:21Z2024-05-14T19:42:21Z2024MENDONÇA, R. F., VELOSO, L. H. N., MAGALHÃES, B. D., MOTTA, F. M. Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems. European Political Science Review, p. 1-18, 2024.http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/123456789/4052https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000358Cambridge University Presshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDeliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systemsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleDemocratic theoryDeliberative democracyDeliberative systemsDeliberative ecologiesTheories of complexityRelational sociologyThis paper advocates a move beyond the systemic approach in the field of Deliberative Democracy. It argues that the notion of deliberative ecology can deliver the necessary conceptual elements that deliberative democrats seek in deliberative systems without some of the problems they either overlook or embrace. To advocate the advantages of an ecological perspective to deliberation, the article focuses on six axes of comparison: (i) performances of actants (instead of functions of arenas and players); (ii) articulations and translations (instead of transmission); (iii) vulnerabilities (instead of pathologies and dysfunctions); (iv) practice (instead of institutionally-oriented design); (v) diverse temporalities (instead of linear temporality) and; (vi) hologram-based analysis (instead of systemic analysis). In a nutshell, the article claims that the ecological approach to deliberation has the advantage of conceptualizing an ever-changing web of relations of interdependency, which connects diverse entities that are either relevant to a public discussion or that hinder its enactment.--http://lattes.cnpq.br/2424518337395565-Mendonça, Ricardo FabrinoVeloso, Lucas Henrique NigriMagalhães, Bruno DiasMotta, Filipe Mendes--https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6759-6249-Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisFundação João PinheiroUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraisengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Fundação João Pinheiroinstname:Fundação João Pinheiro (FJP)instacron:FJPCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/bitstreams/82e302fa-f8f4-4958-a54e-fd55cfb064fc/downloade39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81513http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/bitstreams/0ba13ad5-f0b6-4989-adc6-546f6bbd30fc/downloadbd956f1284434dc4e1aa2e3f265b2322MD52ORIGINALMendonça_Deliberative_ecologies_a_relational_critique_of_deliberative_2024.pdfMendonça_Deliberative_ecologies_a_relational_critique_of_deliberative_2024.pdfapplication/pdf245380http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/bitstreams/b596be46-5f1c-4e87-9db3-edf22055cce5/downloadcfdc87b1cbbac843d34bc6a7358fa73cMD53TEXTMendonça_Deliberative_ecologies_a_relational_critique_of_deliberative_2024.pdf.txtMendonça_Deliberative_ecologies_a_relational_critique_of_deliberative_2024.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain89989http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/bitstreams/4a21b4c4-ae5c-409a-8437-f631f73877e9/download296c19fe8f31fc840d087831d4f5d80dMD54THUMBNAILMendonça_Deliberative_ecologies_a_relational_critique_of_deliberative_2024.pdf.jpgMendonça_Deliberative_ecologies_a_relational_critique_of_deliberative_2024.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5853http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/bitstreams/f2cddf1a-c40d-47c1-85bc-9aab2c9bae7d/download5d52e6ae1c86912939179cc1cf8fcd42MD55123456789/40522024-05-15 03:00:33.848http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilopen.accessoai:repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br:123456789/4052http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-05-15T06:00:33Repositório Institucional da Fundação João Pinheiro - Fundação João Pinheiro (FJP)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
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems
title Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems
spellingShingle Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems
Mendonça, Ricardo Fabrino
Democratic theory
Deliberative democracy
Deliberative systems
Deliberative ecologies
Theories of complexity
Relational sociology
title_short Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems
title_full Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems
title_fullStr Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems
title_full_unstemmed Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems
title_sort Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems
author Mendonça, Ricardo Fabrino
author_facet Mendonça, Ricardo Fabrino
Veloso, Lucas Henrique Nigri
Magalhães, Bruno Dias
Motta, Filipe Mendes
-
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6759-6249
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Fundação João Pinheiro
author_role author
author2 Veloso, Lucas Henrique Nigri
Magalhães, Bruno Dias
Motta, Filipe Mendes
-
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6759-6249
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Fundação João Pinheiro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv -
-
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2424518337395565
-
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendonça, Ricardo Fabrino
Veloso, Lucas Henrique Nigri
Magalhães, Bruno Dias
Motta, Filipe Mendes
-
-
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6759-6249
-
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Fundação João Pinheiro
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.subject.en.none.fl_str_mv Democratic theory
Deliberative democracy
Deliberative systems
Deliberative ecologies
Theories of complexity
Relational sociology
topic Democratic theory
Deliberative democracy
Deliberative systems
Deliberative ecologies
Theories of complexity
Relational sociology
description This paper advocates a move beyond the systemic approach in the field of Deliberative Democracy. It argues that the notion of deliberative ecology can deliver the necessary conceptual elements that deliberative democrats seek in deliberative systems without some of the problems they either overlook or embrace. To advocate the advantages of an ecological perspective to deliberation, the article focuses on six axes of comparison: (i) performances of actants (instead of functions of arenas and players); (ii) articulations and translations (instead of transmission); (iii) vulnerabilities (instead of pathologies and dysfunctions); (iv) practice (instead of institutionally-oriented design); (v) diverse temporalities (instead of linear temporality) and; (vi) hologram-based analysis (instead of systemic analysis). In a nutshell, the article claims that the ecological approach to deliberation has the advantage of conceptualizing an ever-changing web of relations of interdependency, which connects diverse entities that are either relevant to a public discussion or that hinder its enactment.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2024-05-14T19:42:21Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2024-05-14T19:42:21Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv MENDONÇA, R. F., VELOSO, L. H. N., MAGALHÃES, B. D., MOTTA, F. M. Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems. European Political Science Review, p. 1-18, 2024.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/123456789/4052
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000358
identifier_str_mv MENDONÇA, R. F., VELOSO, L. H. N., MAGALHÃES, B. D., MOTTA, F. M. Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems. European Political Science Review, p. 1-18, 2024.
url http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/123456789/4052
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000358
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Fundação João Pinheiro
instname:Fundação João Pinheiro (FJP)
instacron:FJP
instname_str Fundação João Pinheiro (FJP)
instacron_str FJP
institution FJP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Fundação João Pinheiro
collection Repositório Institucional da Fundação João Pinheiro
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/bitstreams/82e302fa-f8f4-4958-a54e-fd55cfb064fc/download
http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/bitstreams/0ba13ad5-f0b6-4989-adc6-546f6bbd30fc/download
http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/bitstreams/b596be46-5f1c-4e87-9db3-edf22055cce5/download
http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/bitstreams/4a21b4c4-ae5c-409a-8437-f631f73877e9/download
http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/bitstreams/f2cddf1a-c40d-47c1-85bc-9aab2c9bae7d/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34
bd956f1284434dc4e1aa2e3f265b2322
cfdc87b1cbbac843d34bc6a7358fa73c
296c19fe8f31fc840d087831d4f5d80d
5d52e6ae1c86912939179cc1cf8fcd42
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Fundação João Pinheiro - Fundação João Pinheiro (FJP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1813649279578800128