Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Merciers Argumentative Theory of Reasoning
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0003-25732016000300002 |
Resumo: | Moral psychology has devalued the role of reasoning in moral life. Nevertheless, the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning (ATR) is a proposal of evolutionary psychology that vindicates the effectiveness of reasoning in communicative processes. This theory even defends its convergence with deliberative democracy. And yet, we hold that the ATR is unsuccessful when supplying a psychological basis for deliberative democracy. The ATR does not adequately explain the epistemic value of deliberation in a way that is congruous with deliberative democracy. To conclude, we will present other shortcomings of the ATR in its concept of reasoning. |
id |
RCAP_373f37a7a0cb9a14582d93644c86293c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0003-25732016000300002 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Merciers Argumentative Theory of Reasoningargumentative theory of reasoningHugo Mercierdeliberative democracyepistemic democracyreasoningMoral psychology has devalued the role of reasoning in moral life. Nevertheless, the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning (ATR) is a proposal of evolutionary psychology that vindicates the effectiveness of reasoning in communicative processes. This theory even defends its convergence with deliberative democracy. And yet, we hold that the ATR is unsuccessful when supplying a psychological basis for deliberative democracy. The ATR does not adequately explain the epistemic value of deliberation in a way that is congruous with deliberative democracy. To conclude, we will present other shortcomings of the ATR in its concept of reasoning.Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0003-25732016000300002Análise Social n.220 2016reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0003-25732016000300002Zafrilla,Pedro Jesús Pérezinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T16:57:06Zoai:scielo:S0003-25732016000300002Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:14:25.743166Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Merciers Argumentative Theory of Reasoning |
title |
Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Merciers Argumentative Theory of Reasoning |
spellingShingle |
Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Merciers Argumentative Theory of Reasoning Zafrilla,Pedro Jesús Pérez argumentative theory of reasoning Hugo Mercier deliberative democracy epistemic democracy reasoning |
title_short |
Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Merciers Argumentative Theory of Reasoning |
title_full |
Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Merciers Argumentative Theory of Reasoning |
title_fullStr |
Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Merciers Argumentative Theory of Reasoning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Merciers Argumentative Theory of Reasoning |
title_sort |
Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Merciers Argumentative Theory of Reasoning |
author |
Zafrilla,Pedro Jesús Pérez |
author_facet |
Zafrilla,Pedro Jesús Pérez |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zafrilla,Pedro Jesús Pérez |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
argumentative theory of reasoning Hugo Mercier deliberative democracy epistemic democracy reasoning |
topic |
argumentative theory of reasoning Hugo Mercier deliberative democracy epistemic democracy reasoning |
description |
Moral psychology has devalued the role of reasoning in moral life. Nevertheless, the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning (ATR) is a proposal of evolutionary psychology that vindicates the effectiveness of reasoning in communicative processes. This theory even defends its convergence with deliberative democracy. And yet, we hold that the ATR is unsuccessful when supplying a psychological basis for deliberative democracy. The ATR does not adequately explain the epistemic value of deliberation in a way that is congruous with deliberative democracy. To conclude, we will present other shortcomings of the ATR in its concept of reasoning. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0003-25732016000300002 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0003-25732016000300002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0003-25732016000300002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Análise Social n.220 2016 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137245946445824 |