Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Shemesh,Shay
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Luckman,Judith, Marom,Tal, Kraus,Oded, Tamir,Sharon Ovnat
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642022000300414
Resumo: Abstract Introduction High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans of the temporal bone are used to assess the bony erosion of the middle-ear structures whenever cholesteatoma is suspected. Objective To study the differences in HRCT Hounsfield unit (HU) index measurements of middle-ear bony structures between an ears with and without cholesteatoma. Methods A retrospective study of 59 patients who underwent surgery due to unilateral cholesteatoma. The HRCT HU index of the scutum, of three middle-ear ossicles, of the lateral semicircular canal (LSCC), and of the fallopian canal was measured in both ears. A comparison was made between the cholesteatoma and the non-cholesteatomatous ear (control). All measurements were conducted by an otolaryngologist. To assess the interobserver bias, 10% of the samples were randomly and independently assessed by another otolaryngologist and a neuroradiologist who were blinded. Results The average HU index was lower in the ear with cholesteatoma when compared with the non-cholesteatomatous ear. While the differences were statistically significant regarding the measurements of the scutum (516.02 ± 311.693 versus 855.64 ± 389.999; p = 0.001), the malleus (1049.44 ± 481.765 versus 1413.47 ± 313.376; p = 0.01), and the incus (498.03 ± 264.184 versus 714.25 ± 405.631; p = 0.001), the differences in the measurements of the LSCC (1042.34 ± 301.066 versus 1154.53 ± 359.609; p = 0.69) and of the fallopian canal (467.19 ± 221.556 versus 543.51 ± 263.573; p = 0.108) were not significantly different between both groups. The stapes was immeasurable in both groups due to its small size. Conclusion Hounsfield unit index measurements are a useful tool that may aid in the diagnosis of early-stage cholesteatoma.
id FORL-1_7fbb73129ebfab526233265408779338
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1809-48642022000300414
network_acronym_str FORL-1
network_name_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository_id_str
spelling Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?computed tomographyHounsfield unitcholesteatomaossiclesAbstract Introduction High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans of the temporal bone are used to assess the bony erosion of the middle-ear structures whenever cholesteatoma is suspected. Objective To study the differences in HRCT Hounsfield unit (HU) index measurements of middle-ear bony structures between an ears with and without cholesteatoma. Methods A retrospective study of 59 patients who underwent surgery due to unilateral cholesteatoma. The HRCT HU index of the scutum, of three middle-ear ossicles, of the lateral semicircular canal (LSCC), and of the fallopian canal was measured in both ears. A comparison was made between the cholesteatoma and the non-cholesteatomatous ear (control). All measurements were conducted by an otolaryngologist. To assess the interobserver bias, 10% of the samples were randomly and independently assessed by another otolaryngologist and a neuroradiologist who were blinded. Results The average HU index was lower in the ear with cholesteatoma when compared with the non-cholesteatomatous ear. While the differences were statistically significant regarding the measurements of the scutum (516.02 ± 311.693 versus 855.64 ± 389.999; p = 0.001), the malleus (1049.44 ± 481.765 versus 1413.47 ± 313.376; p = 0.01), and the incus (498.03 ± 264.184 versus 714.25 ± 405.631; p = 0.001), the differences in the measurements of the LSCC (1042.34 ± 301.066 versus 1154.53 ± 359.609; p = 0.69) and of the fallopian canal (467.19 ± 221.556 versus 543.51 ± 263.573; p = 0.108) were not significantly different between both groups. The stapes was immeasurable in both groups due to its small size. Conclusion Hounsfield unit index measurements are a useful tool that may aid in the diagnosis of early-stage cholesteatoma.Fundação Otorrinolaringologia2022-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642022000300414International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.26 n.3 2022reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)instacron:FORL10.1055/s-0041-1736580info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessShemesh,ShayLuckman,JudithMarom,TalKraus,OdedTamir,Sharon Ovnateng2022-11-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-48642022000300414Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/iao/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br1809-48641809-4864opendoar:2022-11-01T00:00International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
spellingShingle Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
Shemesh,Shay
computed tomography
Hounsfield unit
cholesteatoma
ossicles
title_short Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title_full Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title_fullStr Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title_full_unstemmed Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title_sort Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
author Shemesh,Shay
author_facet Shemesh,Shay
Luckman,Judith
Marom,Tal
Kraus,Oded
Tamir,Sharon Ovnat
author_role author
author2 Luckman,Judith
Marom,Tal
Kraus,Oded
Tamir,Sharon Ovnat
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Shemesh,Shay
Luckman,Judith
Marom,Tal
Kraus,Oded
Tamir,Sharon Ovnat
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv computed tomography
Hounsfield unit
cholesteatoma
ossicles
topic computed tomography
Hounsfield unit
cholesteatoma
ossicles
description Abstract Introduction High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans of the temporal bone are used to assess the bony erosion of the middle-ear structures whenever cholesteatoma is suspected. Objective To study the differences in HRCT Hounsfield unit (HU) index measurements of middle-ear bony structures between an ears with and without cholesteatoma. Methods A retrospective study of 59 patients who underwent surgery due to unilateral cholesteatoma. The HRCT HU index of the scutum, of three middle-ear ossicles, of the lateral semicircular canal (LSCC), and of the fallopian canal was measured in both ears. A comparison was made between the cholesteatoma and the non-cholesteatomatous ear (control). All measurements were conducted by an otolaryngologist. To assess the interobserver bias, 10% of the samples were randomly and independently assessed by another otolaryngologist and a neuroradiologist who were blinded. Results The average HU index was lower in the ear with cholesteatoma when compared with the non-cholesteatomatous ear. While the differences were statistically significant regarding the measurements of the scutum (516.02 ± 311.693 versus 855.64 ± 389.999; p = 0.001), the malleus (1049.44 ± 481.765 versus 1413.47 ± 313.376; p = 0.01), and the incus (498.03 ± 264.184 versus 714.25 ± 405.631; p = 0.001), the differences in the measurements of the LSCC (1042.34 ± 301.066 versus 1154.53 ± 359.609; p = 0.69) and of the fallopian canal (467.19 ± 221.556 versus 543.51 ± 263.573; p = 0.108) were not significantly different between both groups. The stapes was immeasurable in both groups due to its small size. Conclusion Hounsfield unit index measurements are a useful tool that may aid in the diagnosis of early-stage cholesteatoma.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642022000300414
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642022000300414
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0041-1736580
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.26 n.3 2022
reponame:International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
instname:Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron:FORL
instname_str Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
instacron_str FORL
institution FORL
reponame_str International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
collection International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology - Fundação Otorrinolaringologia (FORL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||iaorl@iaorl.org||archives@internationalarchivesent.org||arquivos@forl.org.br
_version_ 1754203977490104320