Learning and forgetting in Theaetetus 188a1-6

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: González Varela, Edgar
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Hypnos
Texto Completo: https://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/654
Resumo: The puzzle of false judgement “according to knowing and not knowing” presents numerous difficulties of interpretation. According to an influential reading, this is only generated because Socrates excludes from the discussion learning and forgetting, which are intermediate states between knowing and not knowing, or because the disjunction between knowing or not knowing is not an instance of the principle of excluded middle. Here I argue against this interpretation. First I question whether the exclusion of a third alternative to knowing and not knowing plays any role in the puzzle. And then I explain in what sense learning and forgetting are intermediate entities without being a third possibility between knowing and not knowing.
id FSB_f8856f5fc1acaaedf6b5ac1257fe3454
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.hypnos.org.br:article/654
network_acronym_str FSB
network_name_str Hypnos
repository_id_str
spelling Learning and forgetting in Theaetetus 188a1-6Aprender y olvidar en Teeteto 188a1-6Aprender y olvidar en Teeteto 188a1-6conocimientoenigmajuicio falsomemoriaknowledgememorypuzzlefalse judgementconocimientoenigmajuicio falsomemoriaThe puzzle of false judgement “according to knowing and not knowing” presents numerous difficulties of interpretation. According to an influential reading, this is only generated because Socrates excludes from the discussion learning and forgetting, which are intermediate states between knowing and not knowing, or because the disjunction between knowing or not knowing is not an instance of the principle of excluded middle. Here I argue against this interpretation. First I question whether the exclusion of a third alternative to knowing and not knowing plays any role in the puzzle. And then I explain in what sense learning and forgetting are intermediate entities without being a third possibility between knowing and not knowing.El enigma del juicio falso “según el conocer y no conocer” presenta numerosas dificultades de interpretación. Según una influyente lectura, este se genera solo porque Sócrates excluye de la discusión a aprender y a olvidar, estados intermedios entre conocer y no conocer. Es decir, porque la disyunción entre conocer o no conocer no es una instancia del principio del tercero excluido. Aquí argumento en contra de esta interpretación. Primero cuestiono que la exclusión de una tercera alternativa al conocer y al no conocer tenga algún rol en el enigma. Y posteriormente explico en qué sentido aprender y olvidar son entes intermedios sin ser una tercera posibilidad entre conocer y no conocer.El enigma del juicio falso “según el conocer y no conocer” presenta numerosas dificultades de interpretación. Según una influyente lectura, este se genera solo porque Sócrates excluye de la discusión a aprender y a olvidar, estados intermedios entre conocer y no conocer. Es decir, porque la disyunción entre conocer o no conocer no es una instancia del principio del tercero excluido. Aquí argumento en contra de esta interpretación. Primero cuestiono que la exclusión de una tercera alternativa al conocer y al no conocer tenga algún rol en el enigma. Y posteriormente explico en qué sentido aprender y olvidar son entes intermedios sin ser una tercera posibilidad entre conocer y no conocer.Revista HypnosHypnos Journal2022-04-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/654Revista Hypnos; n. 48 (2022); 23-36Hypnos Journal; No. 48 (2022); 23-362177-53461413-9138reponame:Hypnosinstname:Faculdade de São Bento (FSB)instacron:FSBspahttps://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/654/629Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Hypnoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonzález Varela, Edgar2022-04-05T13:20:40Zoai:ojs.hypnos.org.br:article/654Revistahttps://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnosPRIhttps://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/oairachelgazolla@gmail.com2177-53461413-9138opendoar:2023-01-13T09:47:11.162513Hypnos - Faculdade de São Bento (FSB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Learning and forgetting in Theaetetus 188a1-6
Aprender y olvidar en Teeteto 188a1-6
Aprender y olvidar en Teeteto 188a1-6
title Learning and forgetting in Theaetetus 188a1-6
spellingShingle Learning and forgetting in Theaetetus 188a1-6
González Varela, Edgar
conocimiento
enigma
juicio falso
memoria
knowledge
memory
puzzle
false judgement
conocimiento
enigma
juicio falso
memoria
title_short Learning and forgetting in Theaetetus 188a1-6
title_full Learning and forgetting in Theaetetus 188a1-6
title_fullStr Learning and forgetting in Theaetetus 188a1-6
title_full_unstemmed Learning and forgetting in Theaetetus 188a1-6
title_sort Learning and forgetting in Theaetetus 188a1-6
author González Varela, Edgar
author_facet González Varela, Edgar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv González Varela, Edgar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv conocimiento
enigma
juicio falso
memoria
knowledge
memory
puzzle
false judgement
conocimiento
enigma
juicio falso
memoria
topic conocimiento
enigma
juicio falso
memoria
knowledge
memory
puzzle
false judgement
conocimiento
enigma
juicio falso
memoria
description The puzzle of false judgement “according to knowing and not knowing” presents numerous difficulties of interpretation. According to an influential reading, this is only generated because Socrates excludes from the discussion learning and forgetting, which are intermediate states between knowing and not knowing, or because the disjunction between knowing or not knowing is not an instance of the principle of excluded middle. Here I argue against this interpretation. First I question whether the exclusion of a third alternative to knowing and not knowing plays any role in the puzzle. And then I explain in what sense learning and forgetting are intermediate entities without being a third possibility between knowing and not knowing.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/654
url https://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/654
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://hypnos.org.br/index.php/hypnos/article/view/654/629
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Hypnos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Hypnos
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Hypnos
Hypnos Journal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Hypnos
Hypnos Journal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Hypnos; n. 48 (2022); 23-36
Hypnos Journal; No. 48 (2022); 23-36
2177-5346
1413-9138
reponame:Hypnos
instname:Faculdade de São Bento (FSB)
instacron:FSB
instname_str Faculdade de São Bento (FSB)
instacron_str FSB
institution FSB
reponame_str Hypnos
collection Hypnos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Hypnos - Faculdade de São Bento (FSB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rachelgazolla@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051294041505792