Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: CARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: CARVALHO,Vítor Hugo Marçal de, BASTING,Roberta Tarkany
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100301
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the in situ hardness, compressive strength and resilience of soft lining materials used in total removable prostheses in different time intervals Methods total of 48 rectangular test specimens (10 x 3 x 2 mm) were fabricated of each of the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner (Mucopren Soft) and acrylic resin-based material (Trusoft), which were placed on total removable prostheses bases of 12 volunteers (n = 12). The hardness (Shore A), compressive strength (in MPa) and resilience (in Kgf/cm2) were evaluated in different time intervals: 0, 7, 30 and 60 days, at three different locations of the specimens surface. Results The two-way ANOVA and Tukey test showed that the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness values (p = 0.0113) and higher compressive strength (p=0.0252) than the acrylic resin-based material at immediate and 7 days evaluations. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher resilience values than the acrylic resin-based material at all times (p = 0.0133). Hardness and compressive strength were similar for both materials at 30 and 60 days evaluations. Conclusions For both materials,there was a tendency for an increase of hardness, compressive strength and resilience over time, influenced by the composition of the tissue conditioner. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness, compressive strength and resilience than the acrylic resin-based material, specially considering a long-term evaluation up to 60 days.
id FSLM-1_194537e93067037b2b914fae39c54eb2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-86372020000100301
network_acronym_str FSLM-1
network_name_str RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ studyDental prosthesisHardnessMaterial resistanceABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the in situ hardness, compressive strength and resilience of soft lining materials used in total removable prostheses in different time intervals Methods total of 48 rectangular test specimens (10 x 3 x 2 mm) were fabricated of each of the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner (Mucopren Soft) and acrylic resin-based material (Trusoft), which were placed on total removable prostheses bases of 12 volunteers (n = 12). The hardness (Shore A), compressive strength (in MPa) and resilience (in Kgf/cm2) were evaluated in different time intervals: 0, 7, 30 and 60 days, at three different locations of the specimens surface. Results The two-way ANOVA and Tukey test showed that the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness values (p = 0.0113) and higher compressive strength (p=0.0252) than the acrylic resin-based material at immediate and 7 days evaluations. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher resilience values than the acrylic resin-based material at all times (p = 0.0133). Hardness and compressive strength were similar for both materials at 30 and 60 days evaluations. Conclusions For both materials,there was a tendency for an increase of hardness, compressive strength and resilience over time, influenced by the composition of the tissue conditioner. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness, compressive strength and resilience than the acrylic resin-based material, specially considering a long-term evaluation up to 60 days.Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100301RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia v.68 2020reponame:RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)instname:Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)instacron:FSLM10.1590/1981-86372020000042018-0065info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo deCARVALHO,Vítor Hugo Marçal deBASTING,Roberta Tarkanyeng2020-03-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-86372020000100301Revistahttp://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-8637&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||contato@revistargo.com.br1981-86370103-6971opendoar:2020-03-09T00:00RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) - Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study
title Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study
spellingShingle Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study
CARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo de
Dental prosthesis
Hardness
Material resistance
title_short Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study
title_full Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study
title_fullStr Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study
title_full_unstemmed Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study
title_sort Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study
author CARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo de
author_facet CARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo de
CARVALHO,Vítor Hugo Marçal de
BASTING,Roberta Tarkany
author_role author
author2 CARVALHO,Vítor Hugo Marçal de
BASTING,Roberta Tarkany
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv CARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo de
CARVALHO,Vítor Hugo Marçal de
BASTING,Roberta Tarkany
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental prosthesis
Hardness
Material resistance
topic Dental prosthesis
Hardness
Material resistance
description ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the in situ hardness, compressive strength and resilience of soft lining materials used in total removable prostheses in different time intervals Methods total of 48 rectangular test specimens (10 x 3 x 2 mm) were fabricated of each of the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner (Mucopren Soft) and acrylic resin-based material (Trusoft), which were placed on total removable prostheses bases of 12 volunteers (n = 12). The hardness (Shore A), compressive strength (in MPa) and resilience (in Kgf/cm2) were evaluated in different time intervals: 0, 7, 30 and 60 days, at three different locations of the specimens surface. Results The two-way ANOVA and Tukey test showed that the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness values (p = 0.0113) and higher compressive strength (p=0.0252) than the acrylic resin-based material at immediate and 7 days evaluations. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher resilience values than the acrylic resin-based material at all times (p = 0.0133). Hardness and compressive strength were similar for both materials at 30 and 60 days evaluations. Conclusions For both materials,there was a tendency for an increase of hardness, compressive strength and resilience over time, influenced by the composition of the tissue conditioner. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness, compressive strength and resilience than the acrylic resin-based material, specially considering a long-term evaluation up to 60 days.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100301
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100301
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-86372020000042018-0065
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia v.68 2020
reponame:RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)
instname:Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)
instacron:FSLM
instname_str Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)
instacron_str FSLM
institution FSLM
reponame_str RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)
collection RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) - Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||contato@revistargo.com.br
_version_ 1754204122431619072