Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100301 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the in situ hardness, compressive strength and resilience of soft lining materials used in total removable prostheses in different time intervals Methods total of 48 rectangular test specimens (10 x 3 x 2 mm) were fabricated of each of the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner (Mucopren Soft) and acrylic resin-based material (Trusoft), which were placed on total removable prostheses bases of 12 volunteers (n = 12). The hardness (Shore A), compressive strength (in MPa) and resilience (in Kgf/cm2) were evaluated in different time intervals: 0, 7, 30 and 60 days, at three different locations of the specimens surface. Results The two-way ANOVA and Tukey test showed that the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness values (p = 0.0113) and higher compressive strength (p=0.0252) than the acrylic resin-based material at immediate and 7 days evaluations. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher resilience values than the acrylic resin-based material at all times (p = 0.0133). Hardness and compressive strength were similar for both materials at 30 and 60 days evaluations. Conclusions For both materials,there was a tendency for an increase of hardness, compressive strength and resilience over time, influenced by the composition of the tissue conditioner. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness, compressive strength and resilience than the acrylic resin-based material, specially considering a long-term evaluation up to 60 days. |
id |
FSLM-1_194537e93067037b2b914fae39c54eb2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1981-86372020000100301 |
network_acronym_str |
FSLM-1 |
network_name_str |
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ studyDental prosthesisHardnessMaterial resistanceABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the in situ hardness, compressive strength and resilience of soft lining materials used in total removable prostheses in different time intervals Methods total of 48 rectangular test specimens (10 x 3 x 2 mm) were fabricated of each of the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner (Mucopren Soft) and acrylic resin-based material (Trusoft), which were placed on total removable prostheses bases of 12 volunteers (n = 12). The hardness (Shore A), compressive strength (in MPa) and resilience (in Kgf/cm2) were evaluated in different time intervals: 0, 7, 30 and 60 days, at three different locations of the specimens surface. Results The two-way ANOVA and Tukey test showed that the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness values (p = 0.0113) and higher compressive strength (p=0.0252) than the acrylic resin-based material at immediate and 7 days evaluations. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher resilience values than the acrylic resin-based material at all times (p = 0.0133). Hardness and compressive strength were similar for both materials at 30 and 60 days evaluations. Conclusions For both materials,there was a tendency for an increase of hardness, compressive strength and resilience over time, influenced by the composition of the tissue conditioner. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness, compressive strength and resilience than the acrylic resin-based material, specially considering a long-term evaluation up to 60 days.Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100301RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia v.68 2020reponame:RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)instname:Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)instacron:FSLM10.1590/1981-86372020000042018-0065info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo deCARVALHO,Vítor Hugo Marçal deBASTING,Roberta Tarkanyeng2020-03-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-86372020000100301Revistahttp://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-8637&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||contato@revistargo.com.br1981-86370103-6971opendoar:2020-03-09T00:00RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) - Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study |
title |
Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study |
spellingShingle |
Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study CARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo de Dental prosthesis Hardness Material resistance |
title_short |
Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study |
title_full |
Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study |
title_fullStr |
Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study |
title_sort |
Hardness, compressive strength and resilience of complete denture lining materials: an in situ study |
author |
CARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo de |
author_facet |
CARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo de CARVALHO,Vítor Hugo Marçal de BASTING,Roberta Tarkany |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
CARVALHO,Vítor Hugo Marçal de BASTING,Roberta Tarkany |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
CARVALHO JUNIOR,Hugo de CARVALHO,Vítor Hugo Marçal de BASTING,Roberta Tarkany |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental prosthesis Hardness Material resistance |
topic |
Dental prosthesis Hardness Material resistance |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the in situ hardness, compressive strength and resilience of soft lining materials used in total removable prostheses in different time intervals Methods total of 48 rectangular test specimens (10 x 3 x 2 mm) were fabricated of each of the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner (Mucopren Soft) and acrylic resin-based material (Trusoft), which were placed on total removable prostheses bases of 12 volunteers (n = 12). The hardness (Shore A), compressive strength (in MPa) and resilience (in Kgf/cm2) were evaluated in different time intervals: 0, 7, 30 and 60 days, at three different locations of the specimens surface. Results The two-way ANOVA and Tukey test showed that the polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness values (p = 0.0113) and higher compressive strength (p=0.0252) than the acrylic resin-based material at immediate and 7 days evaluations. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher resilience values than the acrylic resin-based material at all times (p = 0.0133). Hardness and compressive strength were similar for both materials at 30 and 60 days evaluations. Conclusions For both materials,there was a tendency for an increase of hardness, compressive strength and resilience over time, influenced by the composition of the tissue conditioner. The polyvinylsiloxane-based soft liner presented higher hardness, compressive strength and resilience than the acrylic resin-based material, specially considering a long-term evaluation up to 60 days. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100301 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-86372020000100301 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-86372020000042018-0065 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia v.68 2020 reponame:RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) instname:Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM) instacron:FSLM |
instname_str |
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM) |
instacron_str |
FSLM |
institution |
FSLM |
reponame_str |
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) |
collection |
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) - Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (FSLM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||contato@revistargo.com.br |
_version_ |
1754204122431619072 |