SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8620 |
Resumo: | In the setting of Theme 793 of the Federal Supreme Court, some points were not addressed or were developed in a generic way, leaving gaps in points such as the definition of responsibility and compensation between the entities. The objective of the article is to investigate which criteria were indicated so that magistrates can determine the responsibilities of federative entities regarding health demands related to pharmacological assistance, considering the SUS and RENAME. The hypothetical-deductive method was adopted, in which the hypothesis is that it will be necessary to use interpretative completeness based on criteria established by Law No. 8.080/1990 and in RENAME, in order to avoid the mistaken liability of a federative entity in health demands. The methodological approaches were developed from the research of jurisprudence, doctrine and contemporary scientific texts. The results confirmed the hypothesis, as it was proven that the binding precedent has gaps regarding the accountability of federative entities in health matters. The conclusions indicate that, while the aforementioned judgment is in force, the magistrates should rely on existing criteria to determine the entity's responsibility, until this is modified or improved in a new judgment or there is a legal change that answers the question. |
id |
FUMEC-1_bb9db783899fd9d91f7830ba31357976 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8620 |
network_acronym_str |
FUMEC-1 |
network_name_str |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793In the setting of Theme 793 of the Federal Supreme Court, some points were not addressed or were developed in a generic way, leaving gaps in points such as the definition of responsibility and compensation between the entities. The objective of the article is to investigate which criteria were indicated so that magistrates can determine the responsibilities of federative entities regarding health demands related to pharmacological assistance, considering the SUS and RENAME. The hypothetical-deductive method was adopted, in which the hypothesis is that it will be necessary to use interpretative completeness based on criteria established by Law No. 8.080/1990 and in RENAME, in order to avoid the mistaken liability of a federative entity in health demands. The methodological approaches were developed from the research of jurisprudence, doctrine and contemporary scientific texts. The results confirmed the hypothesis, as it was proven that the binding precedent has gaps regarding the accountability of federative entities in health matters. The conclusions indicate that, while the aforementioned judgment is in force, the magistrates should rely on existing criteria to determine the entity's responsibility, until this is modified or improved in a new judgment or there is a legal change that answers the question.Na fixação do Tema 793 do Supremo Tribunal Federal alguns pontos deixaram de ser abordados ou foram desenvolvidos de maneira genérica, deixando lacunas em pontos como a definição de responsabilidade e o ressarcimento entre os entes. O objetivo do artigo é averiguar quais critérios foram indicados para que os magistrados possam determinar as responsabilidades dos entes federativos quanto às demandas em saúde relativas à assistência farmacológica, considerando o SUS e a RENAME. Adotou-se o método hipotético-dedutivo, em que a hipótese é de que será necessária a utilização de completude interpretativa a partir de critérios estabelecidos pela Lei nº 8.080/1990 e na RENAME, a fim de que seja evitada a responsabilização equivocada de ente federativo em demandas de saúde. Os encaminhamentos metodológicos se desenvolveram a partir da pesquisa de jurisprudência, doutrina e textos científicos contemporâneos. Os resultados confirmaram a hipótese, pois restou comprovado que o precedente vinculante apresenta lacunas quanto à responsabilização dos entes federativos em questões de saúde. As conclusões indicam que, enquanto vigorar o referido julgado, os magistrados deverão se apoiar em critérios existentes para determinar a responsabilidade do ente, até que este seja modificado ou aperfeiçoado em novo julgado ou que ocorra alteração legal que responda à questão.Universidade FUMEC2022-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/862010.46560/meritum.v16i3.8620Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 20212238-69391980-207210.46560/meritum.v16i3reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)instname:Universidade FUMECinstacron:FUMECporhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8620/4373Lamarão Neto, HomeroTeixeira, Eliana Maria de Souza FrancoSilva, Matheus Coelho da info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-03-16T13:27:44Zoai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8620Revistahttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritumPUBhttps://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/oairevistameritum@fumec.br2238-69391980-2072opendoar:2022-03-16T13:27:44Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMECfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793 |
title |
SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793 |
spellingShingle |
SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793 Lamarão Neto, Homero |
title_short |
SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793 |
title_full |
SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793 |
title_fullStr |
SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793 |
title_full_unstemmed |
SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793 |
title_sort |
SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793 |
author |
Lamarão Neto, Homero |
author_facet |
Lamarão Neto, Homero Teixeira, Eliana Maria de Souza Franco Silva, Matheus Coelho da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Teixeira, Eliana Maria de Souza Franco Silva, Matheus Coelho da |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lamarão Neto, Homero Teixeira, Eliana Maria de Souza Franco Silva, Matheus Coelho da |
description |
In the setting of Theme 793 of the Federal Supreme Court, some points were not addressed or were developed in a generic way, leaving gaps in points such as the definition of responsibility and compensation between the entities. The objective of the article is to investigate which criteria were indicated so that magistrates can determine the responsibilities of federative entities regarding health demands related to pharmacological assistance, considering the SUS and RENAME. The hypothetical-deductive method was adopted, in which the hypothesis is that it will be necessary to use interpretative completeness based on criteria established by Law No. 8.080/1990 and in RENAME, in order to avoid the mistaken liability of a federative entity in health demands. The methodological approaches were developed from the research of jurisprudence, doctrine and contemporary scientific texts. The results confirmed the hypothesis, as it was proven that the binding precedent has gaps regarding the accountability of federative entities in health matters. The conclusions indicate that, while the aforementioned judgment is in force, the magistrates should rely on existing criteria to determine the entity's responsibility, until this is modified or improved in a new judgment or there is a legal change that answers the question. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8620 10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8620 |
url |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8620 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8620 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8620/4373 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade FUMEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade FUMEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021 2238-6939 1980-2072 10.46560/meritum.v16i3 reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) instname:Universidade FUMEC instacron:FUMEC |
instname_str |
Universidade FUMEC |
instacron_str |
FUMEC |
institution |
FUMEC |
reponame_str |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
collection |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMEC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistameritum@fumec.br |
_version_ |
1798945263674458112 |