SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lamarão Neto, Homero
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Teixeira, Eliana Maria de Souza Franco, Silva, Matheus Coelho da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
Texto Completo: http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8620
Resumo: In the setting of Theme 793 of the Federal Supreme Court, some points were not addressed or were developed in a generic way, leaving gaps in points such as the definition of responsibility and compensation between the entities. The objective of the article is to investigate which criteria were indicated so that magistrates can determine the responsibilities of federative entities regarding health demands related to pharmacological assistance, considering the SUS and RENAME. The hypothetical-deductive method was adopted, in which the hypothesis is that it will be necessary to use interpretative completeness based on criteria established by Law No. 8.080/1990 and in RENAME, in order to avoid the mistaken liability of a federative entity in health demands. The methodological approaches were developed from the research of jurisprudence, doctrine and contemporary scientific texts. The results confirmed the hypothesis, as it was proven that the binding precedent has gaps regarding the accountability of federative entities in health matters. The conclusions indicate that, while the aforementioned judgment is in force, the magistrates should rely on existing criteria to determine the entity's responsibility, until this is modified or improved in a new judgment or there is a legal change that answers the question.
id FUMEC-1_bb9db783899fd9d91f7830ba31357976
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8620
network_acronym_str FUMEC-1
network_name_str Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793In the setting of Theme 793 of the Federal Supreme Court, some points were not addressed or were developed in a generic way, leaving gaps in points such as the definition of responsibility and compensation between the entities. The objective of the article is to investigate which criteria were indicated so that magistrates can determine the responsibilities of federative entities regarding health demands related to pharmacological assistance, considering the SUS and RENAME. The hypothetical-deductive method was adopted, in which the hypothesis is that it will be necessary to use interpretative completeness based on criteria established by Law No. 8.080/1990 and in RENAME, in order to avoid the mistaken liability of a federative entity in health demands. The methodological approaches were developed from the research of jurisprudence, doctrine and contemporary scientific texts. The results confirmed the hypothesis, as it was proven that the binding precedent has gaps regarding the accountability of federative entities in health matters. The conclusions indicate that, while the aforementioned judgment is in force, the magistrates should rely on existing criteria to determine the entity's responsibility, until this is modified or improved in a new judgment or there is a legal change that answers the question.Na fixação do Tema 793 do Supremo Tribunal Federal alguns pontos deixaram de ser abordados ou foram desenvolvidos de maneira genérica, deixando lacunas em pontos como a definição de responsabilidade e o ressarcimento entre os entes. O objetivo do artigo é averiguar quais critérios foram indicados para que os magistrados possam determinar as responsabilidades dos entes federativos quanto às demandas em saúde relativas à assistência farmacológica, considerando o SUS e a RENAME. Adotou-se o método hipotético-dedutivo, em que a hipótese é de que será necessária a utilização de completude interpretativa a partir de critérios estabelecidos pela Lei nº 8.080/1990 e na RENAME, a fim de que seja evitada a responsabilização equivocada de ente federativo em demandas de saúde. Os encaminhamentos metodológicos se desenvolveram a partir da pesquisa de jurisprudência, doutrina e textos científicos contemporâneos. Os resultados confirmaram a hipótese, pois restou comprovado que o precedente vinculante apresenta lacunas quanto à responsabilização dos entes federativos em questões de saúde. As conclusões indicam que, enquanto vigorar o referido julgado, os magistrados deverão se apoiar em critérios existentes para determinar a responsabilidade do ente, até que este seja modificado ou aperfeiçoado em novo julgado ou que ocorra alteração legal que responda à questão.Universidade FUMEC2022-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/862010.46560/meritum.v16i3.8620Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 20212238-69391980-207210.46560/meritum.v16i3reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)instname:Universidade FUMECinstacron:FUMECporhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8620/4373Lamarão Neto, HomeroTeixeira, Eliana Maria de Souza FrancoSilva, Matheus Coelho da info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-03-16T13:27:44Zoai:ojs.fumec.br:article/8620Revistahttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritumPUBhttps://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/oairevistameritum@fumec.br2238-69391980-2072opendoar:2022-03-16T13:27:44Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMECfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793
title SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793
spellingShingle SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793
Lamarão Neto, Homero
title_short SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793
title_full SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793
title_fullStr SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793
title_full_unstemmed SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793
title_sort SOLIDARIEDADE DOS ENTES FEDERATIVOS: LACUNAS DO TEMA 793
author Lamarão Neto, Homero
author_facet Lamarão Neto, Homero
Teixeira, Eliana Maria de Souza Franco
Silva, Matheus Coelho da
author_role author
author2 Teixeira, Eliana Maria de Souza Franco
Silva, Matheus Coelho da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lamarão Neto, Homero
Teixeira, Eliana Maria de Souza Franco
Silva, Matheus Coelho da
description In the setting of Theme 793 of the Federal Supreme Court, some points were not addressed or were developed in a generic way, leaving gaps in points such as the definition of responsibility and compensation between the entities. The objective of the article is to investigate which criteria were indicated so that magistrates can determine the responsibilities of federative entities regarding health demands related to pharmacological assistance, considering the SUS and RENAME. The hypothetical-deductive method was adopted, in which the hypothesis is that it will be necessary to use interpretative completeness based on criteria established by Law No. 8.080/1990 and in RENAME, in order to avoid the mistaken liability of a federative entity in health demands. The methodological approaches were developed from the research of jurisprudence, doctrine and contemporary scientific texts. The results confirmed the hypothesis, as it was proven that the binding precedent has gaps regarding the accountability of federative entities in health matters. The conclusions indicate that, while the aforementioned judgment is in force, the magistrates should rely on existing criteria to determine the entity's responsibility, until this is modified or improved in a new judgment or there is a legal change that answers the question.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8620
10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8620
url http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8620
identifier_str_mv 10.46560/meritum.v16i3.8620
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/8620/4373
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade FUMEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade FUMEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; Vol. 16, Nº 3- setembro/dezembro 2021
2238-6939
1980-2072
10.46560/meritum.v16i3
reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
instname:Universidade FUMEC
instacron:FUMEC
instname_str Universidade FUMEC
instacron_str FUMEC
institution FUMEC
reponame_str Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
collection Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMEC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistameritum@fumec.br
_version_ 1798945263674458112