HAS THE VICTIM OF AN TORT OF CONTRACTUAL ILLEGAL BURDEN OF MITIGATING YOUR OWN LOSSES?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/9268 |
Resumo: | In this work, the author addresses the rule of non-compensation of avoidable damages sustained by the victim of a tort. The rule establishing the burden to mitigate is derived from the abuse of rights, in its objective aspect, finding a more remote foundation in the principle of objective good faith. In terms of statutory law, the mitigation rule is therefore derived from art. 187 of the Civil Code. The author also analyzes the possible grounds for limiting compensation to unavoidable damages in art. 403 of the Civil Code and, therefore, in the absence of causality between the tortious act and the part of the damage that the victim could have avoided. This legal basis, however, is refuted because it does not cover all cases in which the burden of mitigation is applied and because it does not bring to the analysis an axiological assessment of the victim's conduct when avoiding damages or not. Only by basing the burden of mitigation on good faith would it be possible, in the analysis of the victim's conduct, to compare it with socially expected and accepted standards. |
id |
FUMEC-1_d60dc1362ccd8ae355f616869374d1da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.fumec.br:article/9268 |
network_acronym_str |
FUMEC-1 |
network_name_str |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
HAS THE VICTIM OF AN TORT OF CONTRACTUAL ILLEGAL BURDEN OF MITIGATING YOUR OWN LOSSES?TEM A VÍTIMA DE UM ILÍCITO EXTRACONTRATUAL O ÔNUS DE MITIGAR SEUS PRÓPRIOS PREJUÍZOS?In this work, the author addresses the rule of non-compensation of avoidable damages sustained by the victim of a tort. The rule establishing the burden to mitigate is derived from the abuse of rights, in its objective aspect, finding a more remote foundation in the principle of objective good faith. In terms of statutory law, the mitigation rule is therefore derived from art. 187 of the Civil Code. The author also analyzes the possible grounds for limiting compensation to unavoidable damages in art. 403 of the Civil Code and, therefore, in the absence of causality between the tortious act and the part of the damage that the victim could have avoided. This legal basis, however, is refuted because it does not cover all cases in which the burden of mitigation is applied and because it does not bring to the analysis an axiological assessment of the victim's conduct when avoiding damages or not. Only by basing the burden of mitigation on good faith would it be possible, in the analysis of the victim's conduct, to compare it with socially expected and accepted standards.Nesse trabalho, o autor aborda a regra da não reparação dos danos sofridos pela vítima de um ilícito extracontratual que poderiam ter sido por ela evitados pelo emprego de esforços razoáveis. A norma estabelecendo o ônus de mitigar é extraída do abuso do direito, em seu aspecto objetivo, encontrando fundamento mais remoto no princípio da boa-fé objetiva. Em termos de direito positivo, a norma de mitigação é derivada, portanto, do art. 187 do Código Civil. O autor analisa, ainda, a possível fundamentação para a limitação da indenização aos danos inevitáveis no art. 403 do Código Civil e, portanto, na ausência de causalidade entre o ato ilícito e a parte do dano que a vítima poderia ter evitado. Esse fundamento, entretanto, é refutado por não abranger todos os casos em que o ônus de mitigar é aplicado e por não trazer à análise do intérprete uma avaliação axiológica da conduta da vítima ao evitar ou não os danos. Apenas fundamentando o ônus de mitigar na boa-fé é que seria possível, na análise da conduta da vítima, a sua comparação com padrões socialmente esperados e aceitos.Universidade FUMEC2023-03-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/926810.46560/meritum.v17i2.9268Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; V. 17, No. 2- May/August 2022Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; V. 17, No. 2- Mayo/Agosto 2022Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; V. 17, n° 2 - mai/août 2022Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; V. 17, Nº 2 - maio/agosto 20222238-69391980-207210.46560/meritum.v17i2reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online)instname:Universidade FUMECinstacron:FUMECporhttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/9268/4646Lopes, Christian Sahb Batista info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-08T14:10:27Zoai:ojs.fumec.br:article/9268Revistahttp://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritumPUBhttps://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/oairevistameritum@fumec.br2238-69391980-2072opendoar:2023-03-08T14:10:27Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMECfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
HAS THE VICTIM OF AN TORT OF CONTRACTUAL ILLEGAL BURDEN OF MITIGATING YOUR OWN LOSSES? TEM A VÍTIMA DE UM ILÍCITO EXTRACONTRATUAL O ÔNUS DE MITIGAR SEUS PRÓPRIOS PREJUÍZOS? |
title |
HAS THE VICTIM OF AN TORT OF CONTRACTUAL ILLEGAL BURDEN OF MITIGATING YOUR OWN LOSSES? |
spellingShingle |
HAS THE VICTIM OF AN TORT OF CONTRACTUAL ILLEGAL BURDEN OF MITIGATING YOUR OWN LOSSES? Lopes, Christian Sahb Batista |
title_short |
HAS THE VICTIM OF AN TORT OF CONTRACTUAL ILLEGAL BURDEN OF MITIGATING YOUR OWN LOSSES? |
title_full |
HAS THE VICTIM OF AN TORT OF CONTRACTUAL ILLEGAL BURDEN OF MITIGATING YOUR OWN LOSSES? |
title_fullStr |
HAS THE VICTIM OF AN TORT OF CONTRACTUAL ILLEGAL BURDEN OF MITIGATING YOUR OWN LOSSES? |
title_full_unstemmed |
HAS THE VICTIM OF AN TORT OF CONTRACTUAL ILLEGAL BURDEN OF MITIGATING YOUR OWN LOSSES? |
title_sort |
HAS THE VICTIM OF AN TORT OF CONTRACTUAL ILLEGAL BURDEN OF MITIGATING YOUR OWN LOSSES? |
author |
Lopes, Christian Sahb Batista |
author_facet |
Lopes, Christian Sahb Batista |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, Christian Sahb Batista |
description |
In this work, the author addresses the rule of non-compensation of avoidable damages sustained by the victim of a tort. The rule establishing the burden to mitigate is derived from the abuse of rights, in its objective aspect, finding a more remote foundation in the principle of objective good faith. In terms of statutory law, the mitigation rule is therefore derived from art. 187 of the Civil Code. The author also analyzes the possible grounds for limiting compensation to unavoidable damages in art. 403 of the Civil Code and, therefore, in the absence of causality between the tortious act and the part of the damage that the victim could have avoided. This legal basis, however, is refuted because it does not cover all cases in which the burden of mitigation is applied and because it does not bring to the analysis an axiological assessment of the victim's conduct when avoiding damages or not. Only by basing the burden of mitigation on good faith would it be possible, in the analysis of the victim's conduct, to compare it with socially expected and accepted standards. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/9268 10.46560/meritum.v17i2.9268 |
url |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/9268 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.46560/meritum.v17i2.9268 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revista.fumec.br/index.php/meritum/article/view/9268/4646 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade FUMEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade FUMEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Meritum, Law Journal of FUMEC University; V. 17, No. 2- May/August 2022 Meritum, Revista de Derecho de la Universidad FUMEC; V. 17, No. 2- Mayo/Agosto 2022 Meritum, Journal de droit de l'Université FUMEC; V. 17, n° 2 - mai/août 2022 Meritum, Revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC; V. 17, Nº 2 - maio/agosto 2022 2238-6939 1980-2072 10.46560/meritum.v17i2 reponame:Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) instname:Universidade FUMEC instacron:FUMEC |
instname_str |
Universidade FUMEC |
instacron_str |
FUMEC |
institution |
FUMEC |
reponame_str |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
collection |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Meritum (Belo Horizonte. Online) - Universidade FUMEC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistameritum@fumec.br |
_version_ |
1798945264110665728 |