Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Antoniazzi,Raquel Pippi
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Cargnelutti,Bruna, Freitas,Daniela Napoleão, Guimarães,Magáli Beck, Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin, Feldens,Carlos Alberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000100026
Resumo: Although the use of injectable anesthesia prior to subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) reduces pain, many patients report fear and prolonged numbness of adjacent tissues. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of a eutectic mixture containing 25 mg/g of lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine, injectable 2% lidocaine, topical 2% benzocaine and a placebo substance on reducing pain during SRP. In this randomized, split-mouth, masked clinical trial, thirty-two patients presenting more than two teeth with probing depth and clinical attachment level ≥5 mm in at least 4 sextants were randomly allocated to four groups: EMLA(r); injectable 2% lidocaine; topical 2% benzocaine and placebo. Pain and discomfort were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal scale (VS). Repeated-measures analysis of variance and Poisson regression were used for analysis. Patient satisfaction with the anesthesia was determined at the end of each treatment session. VAS and VS scores did not differ between injectable 2% lidocaine and EMLA (p>0.05) and both substances showed significantly better pain control compared to 2% benzocaine and placebo (p<0.05). 93.7% and 81.2% of the individuals were satisfied with the injectable anesthetic and EMLA, respectively (p=0.158). Dissatisfaction with benzocaine and placebo was approximately 10 times greater than injectable anesthesia (p=0.001). In conclusion, EMLA showed an equivalent effect on pain control when compared to the injectable anesthesia and performed better than 2% benzocaine in SRP. Thus, EMLA is a viable anesthetic option during scaling and root planning, despite the frequent need for second application.
id FUNORP-1_38987f7fc94a4ba10e4bd811fca6797e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402015000100026
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Triallocal anesthesiaperiodontitisroot planingpain.Although the use of injectable anesthesia prior to subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) reduces pain, many patients report fear and prolonged numbness of adjacent tissues. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of a eutectic mixture containing 25 mg/g of lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine, injectable 2% lidocaine, topical 2% benzocaine and a placebo substance on reducing pain during SRP. In this randomized, split-mouth, masked clinical trial, thirty-two patients presenting more than two teeth with probing depth and clinical attachment level ≥5 mm in at least 4 sextants were randomly allocated to four groups: EMLA(r); injectable 2% lidocaine; topical 2% benzocaine and placebo. Pain and discomfort were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal scale (VS). Repeated-measures analysis of variance and Poisson regression were used for analysis. Patient satisfaction with the anesthesia was determined at the end of each treatment session. VAS and VS scores did not differ between injectable 2% lidocaine and EMLA (p>0.05) and both substances showed significantly better pain control compared to 2% benzocaine and placebo (p<0.05). 93.7% and 81.2% of the individuals were satisfied with the injectable anesthetic and EMLA, respectively (p=0.158). Dissatisfaction with benzocaine and placebo was approximately 10 times greater than injectable anesthesia (p=0.001). In conclusion, EMLA showed an equivalent effect on pain control when compared to the injectable anesthesia and performed better than 2% benzocaine in SRP. Thus, EMLA is a viable anesthetic option during scaling and root planning, despite the frequent need for second application.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000100026Brazilian Dental Journal v.26 n.1 2015reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201300131info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntoniazzi,Raquel PippiCargnelutti,BrunaFreitas,Daniela NapoleãoGuimarães,Magáli BeckZanatta,Fabricio BatistinFeldens,Carlos Albertoeng2015-02-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402015000100026Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2015-02-06T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial
spellingShingle Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Antoniazzi,Raquel Pippi
local anesthesia
periodontitis
root planing
pain.
title_short Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing: a Randomized Clinical Trial
author Antoniazzi,Raquel Pippi
author_facet Antoniazzi,Raquel Pippi
Cargnelutti,Bruna
Freitas,Daniela Napoleão
Guimarães,Magáli Beck
Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
Feldens,Carlos Alberto
author_role author
author2 Cargnelutti,Bruna
Freitas,Daniela Napoleão
Guimarães,Magáli Beck
Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
Feldens,Carlos Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antoniazzi,Raquel Pippi
Cargnelutti,Bruna
Freitas,Daniela Napoleão
Guimarães,Magáli Beck
Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
Feldens,Carlos Alberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv local anesthesia
periodontitis
root planing
pain.
topic local anesthesia
periodontitis
root planing
pain.
description Although the use of injectable anesthesia prior to subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) reduces pain, many patients report fear and prolonged numbness of adjacent tissues. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of a eutectic mixture containing 25 mg/g of lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine, injectable 2% lidocaine, topical 2% benzocaine and a placebo substance on reducing pain during SRP. In this randomized, split-mouth, masked clinical trial, thirty-two patients presenting more than two teeth with probing depth and clinical attachment level ≥5 mm in at least 4 sextants were randomly allocated to four groups: EMLA(r); injectable 2% lidocaine; topical 2% benzocaine and placebo. Pain and discomfort were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal scale (VS). Repeated-measures analysis of variance and Poisson regression were used for analysis. Patient satisfaction with the anesthesia was determined at the end of each treatment session. VAS and VS scores did not differ between injectable 2% lidocaine and EMLA (p>0.05) and both substances showed significantly better pain control compared to 2% benzocaine and placebo (p<0.05). 93.7% and 81.2% of the individuals were satisfied with the injectable anesthetic and EMLA, respectively (p=0.158). Dissatisfaction with benzocaine and placebo was approximately 10 times greater than injectable anesthesia (p=0.001). In conclusion, EMLA showed an equivalent effect on pain control when compared to the injectable anesthesia and performed better than 2% benzocaine in SRP. Thus, EMLA is a viable anesthetic option during scaling and root planning, despite the frequent need for second application.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000100026
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000100026
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440201300131
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.26 n.1 2015
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204093473095680