In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Scelza,Miriam Zaccaro
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Caldas,Isleine Portal, Mattos,Jhony Medeiros de, Oliveira,Felipe, Carvalho,Waldimir, Alves,Gutemberg Gomes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000500507
Resumo: Abstract This study aimed to compare the cytotoxicity of the Vita AC12, Lava Ultimate, Vita Enamic and InSync indirect restorative materials. Extracts of each material were prepared by incubation for 1, 7 and 40 days, with daily washing. Human gingival fibroblasts were exposed to the extracts, and cell viability was evaluated by sequential assessment of mitochondrial activity (XTT), membrane integrity (NRU) and cell density (CVDE). Extracts of polystyrene beads and latex fragments were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Differences between groups and experimental times were evaluated by analysis of variance. At the 24 h extraction, significant differences between the control and both Vita AC-12 and InSync were observed in the XTT assay (p<0.05), and between the control and both Enamic and Lava Ultimate, in the CVDE assay (p<0.05). AC12, Lava Ultimate, and InSync presented significantly lower cell viability than Enamic and the control group, in the NRU assay (p<0.05). The Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate hybrid ceramic-like materials presented better biocompatibility at the 24 h extraction time point than the AC12 and InSync ceramic materials. However, a simulation of the removal of toxic components by biological fluids, conducted by using longer extraction times and daily washing, led to the absence of cytotoxicity in all the tested restorative materials. These findings can be viewed as positive for the clinical indication of these restorative materials, considering their contact with adjacent soft tissues for extended periods of time.
id FUNORP-1_9b624cc4c53a49f4f1904d01bbb80b0f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402018000500507
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materialsdental porcelainprosthodonticstoxicity testsbiocompatible materialsfibroblastsAbstract This study aimed to compare the cytotoxicity of the Vita AC12, Lava Ultimate, Vita Enamic and InSync indirect restorative materials. Extracts of each material were prepared by incubation for 1, 7 and 40 days, with daily washing. Human gingival fibroblasts were exposed to the extracts, and cell viability was evaluated by sequential assessment of mitochondrial activity (XTT), membrane integrity (NRU) and cell density (CVDE). Extracts of polystyrene beads and latex fragments were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Differences between groups and experimental times were evaluated by analysis of variance. At the 24 h extraction, significant differences between the control and both Vita AC-12 and InSync were observed in the XTT assay (p<0.05), and between the control and both Enamic and Lava Ultimate, in the CVDE assay (p<0.05). AC12, Lava Ultimate, and InSync presented significantly lower cell viability than Enamic and the control group, in the NRU assay (p<0.05). The Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate hybrid ceramic-like materials presented better biocompatibility at the 24 h extraction time point than the AC12 and InSync ceramic materials. However, a simulation of the removal of toxic components by biological fluids, conducted by using longer extraction times and daily washing, led to the absence of cytotoxicity in all the tested restorative materials. These findings can be viewed as positive for the clinical indication of these restorative materials, considering their contact with adjacent soft tissues for extended periods of time.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000500507Brazilian Dental Journal v.29 n.5 2018reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201801919info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScelza,Miriam ZaccaroCaldas,Isleine PortalMattos,Jhony Medeiros deOliveira,FelipeCarvalho,WaldimirAlves,Gutemberg Gomeseng2018-11-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402018000500507Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2018-11-22T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials
title In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials
spellingShingle In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials
Scelza,Miriam Zaccaro
dental porcelain
prosthodontics
toxicity tests
biocompatible materials
fibroblasts
title_short In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials
title_full In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials
title_fullStr In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials
title_sort In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials
author Scelza,Miriam Zaccaro
author_facet Scelza,Miriam Zaccaro
Caldas,Isleine Portal
Mattos,Jhony Medeiros de
Oliveira,Felipe
Carvalho,Waldimir
Alves,Gutemberg Gomes
author_role author
author2 Caldas,Isleine Portal
Mattos,Jhony Medeiros de
Oliveira,Felipe
Carvalho,Waldimir
Alves,Gutemberg Gomes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scelza,Miriam Zaccaro
Caldas,Isleine Portal
Mattos,Jhony Medeiros de
Oliveira,Felipe
Carvalho,Waldimir
Alves,Gutemberg Gomes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv dental porcelain
prosthodontics
toxicity tests
biocompatible materials
fibroblasts
topic dental porcelain
prosthodontics
toxicity tests
biocompatible materials
fibroblasts
description Abstract This study aimed to compare the cytotoxicity of the Vita AC12, Lava Ultimate, Vita Enamic and InSync indirect restorative materials. Extracts of each material were prepared by incubation for 1, 7 and 40 days, with daily washing. Human gingival fibroblasts were exposed to the extracts, and cell viability was evaluated by sequential assessment of mitochondrial activity (XTT), membrane integrity (NRU) and cell density (CVDE). Extracts of polystyrene beads and latex fragments were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Differences between groups and experimental times were evaluated by analysis of variance. At the 24 h extraction, significant differences between the control and both Vita AC-12 and InSync were observed in the XTT assay (p<0.05), and between the control and both Enamic and Lava Ultimate, in the CVDE assay (p<0.05). AC12, Lava Ultimate, and InSync presented significantly lower cell viability than Enamic and the control group, in the NRU assay (p<0.05). The Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate hybrid ceramic-like materials presented better biocompatibility at the 24 h extraction time point than the AC12 and InSync ceramic materials. However, a simulation of the removal of toxic components by biological fluids, conducted by using longer extraction times and daily washing, led to the absence of cytotoxicity in all the tested restorative materials. These findings can be viewed as positive for the clinical indication of these restorative materials, considering their contact with adjacent soft tissues for extended periods of time.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000500507
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000500507
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440201801919
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.29 n.5 2018
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204095301812224