In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Journal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000500507 |
Resumo: | Abstract This study aimed to compare the cytotoxicity of the Vita AC12, Lava Ultimate, Vita Enamic and InSync indirect restorative materials. Extracts of each material were prepared by incubation for 1, 7 and 40 days, with daily washing. Human gingival fibroblasts were exposed to the extracts, and cell viability was evaluated by sequential assessment of mitochondrial activity (XTT), membrane integrity (NRU) and cell density (CVDE). Extracts of polystyrene beads and latex fragments were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Differences between groups and experimental times were evaluated by analysis of variance. At the 24 h extraction, significant differences between the control and both Vita AC-12 and InSync were observed in the XTT assay (p<0.05), and between the control and both Enamic and Lava Ultimate, in the CVDE assay (p<0.05). AC12, Lava Ultimate, and InSync presented significantly lower cell viability than Enamic and the control group, in the NRU assay (p<0.05). The Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate hybrid ceramic-like materials presented better biocompatibility at the 24 h extraction time point than the AC12 and InSync ceramic materials. However, a simulation of the removal of toxic components by biological fluids, conducted by using longer extraction times and daily washing, led to the absence of cytotoxicity in all the tested restorative materials. These findings can be viewed as positive for the clinical indication of these restorative materials, considering their contact with adjacent soft tissues for extended periods of time. |
id |
FUNORP-1_9b624cc4c53a49f4f1904d01bbb80b0f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-64402018000500507 |
network_acronym_str |
FUNORP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materialsdental porcelainprosthodonticstoxicity testsbiocompatible materialsfibroblastsAbstract This study aimed to compare the cytotoxicity of the Vita AC12, Lava Ultimate, Vita Enamic and InSync indirect restorative materials. Extracts of each material were prepared by incubation for 1, 7 and 40 days, with daily washing. Human gingival fibroblasts were exposed to the extracts, and cell viability was evaluated by sequential assessment of mitochondrial activity (XTT), membrane integrity (NRU) and cell density (CVDE). Extracts of polystyrene beads and latex fragments were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Differences between groups and experimental times were evaluated by analysis of variance. At the 24 h extraction, significant differences between the control and both Vita AC-12 and InSync were observed in the XTT assay (p<0.05), and between the control and both Enamic and Lava Ultimate, in the CVDE assay (p<0.05). AC12, Lava Ultimate, and InSync presented significantly lower cell viability than Enamic and the control group, in the NRU assay (p<0.05). The Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate hybrid ceramic-like materials presented better biocompatibility at the 24 h extraction time point than the AC12 and InSync ceramic materials. However, a simulation of the removal of toxic components by biological fluids, conducted by using longer extraction times and daily washing, led to the absence of cytotoxicity in all the tested restorative materials. These findings can be viewed as positive for the clinical indication of these restorative materials, considering their contact with adjacent soft tissues for extended periods of time.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000500507Brazilian Dental Journal v.29 n.5 2018reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201801919info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScelza,Miriam ZaccaroCaldas,Isleine PortalMattos,Jhony Medeiros deOliveira,FelipeCarvalho,WaldimirAlves,Gutemberg Gomeseng2018-11-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402018000500507Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2018-11-22T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials |
title |
In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials |
spellingShingle |
In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials Scelza,Miriam Zaccaro dental porcelain prosthodontics toxicity tests biocompatible materials fibroblasts |
title_short |
In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials |
title_full |
In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials |
title_fullStr |
In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials |
title_full_unstemmed |
In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials |
title_sort |
In Vitro Analysis of the Cytotoxicity of Indirect Restorative Materials |
author |
Scelza,Miriam Zaccaro |
author_facet |
Scelza,Miriam Zaccaro Caldas,Isleine Portal Mattos,Jhony Medeiros de Oliveira,Felipe Carvalho,Waldimir Alves,Gutemberg Gomes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Caldas,Isleine Portal Mattos,Jhony Medeiros de Oliveira,Felipe Carvalho,Waldimir Alves,Gutemberg Gomes |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Scelza,Miriam Zaccaro Caldas,Isleine Portal Mattos,Jhony Medeiros de Oliveira,Felipe Carvalho,Waldimir Alves,Gutemberg Gomes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
dental porcelain prosthodontics toxicity tests biocompatible materials fibroblasts |
topic |
dental porcelain prosthodontics toxicity tests biocompatible materials fibroblasts |
description |
Abstract This study aimed to compare the cytotoxicity of the Vita AC12, Lava Ultimate, Vita Enamic and InSync indirect restorative materials. Extracts of each material were prepared by incubation for 1, 7 and 40 days, with daily washing. Human gingival fibroblasts were exposed to the extracts, and cell viability was evaluated by sequential assessment of mitochondrial activity (XTT), membrane integrity (NRU) and cell density (CVDE). Extracts of polystyrene beads and latex fragments were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Differences between groups and experimental times were evaluated by analysis of variance. At the 24 h extraction, significant differences between the control and both Vita AC-12 and InSync were observed in the XTT assay (p<0.05), and between the control and both Enamic and Lava Ultimate, in the CVDE assay (p<0.05). AC12, Lava Ultimate, and InSync presented significantly lower cell viability than Enamic and the control group, in the NRU assay (p<0.05). The Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate hybrid ceramic-like materials presented better biocompatibility at the 24 h extraction time point than the AC12 and InSync ceramic materials. However, a simulation of the removal of toxic components by biological fluids, conducted by using longer extraction times and daily washing, led to the absence of cytotoxicity in all the tested restorative materials. These findings can be viewed as positive for the clinical indication of these restorative materials, considering their contact with adjacent soft tissues for extended periods of time. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000500507 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402018000500507 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-6440201801919 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal v.29 n.5 2018 reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) instacron:FUNORP |
instname_str |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
instacron_str |
FUNORP |
institution |
FUNORP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754204095301812224 |