Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbosa,Silvia Helena
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Zanata,Régia Luzia, Navarro,Maria Fidela de Lima, Nunes,Osvaldo Benoni
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402005000100007
Resumo: This study examined the average surface roughness (Ra, µm) of 2 microfilled (Durafill and Perfection), 1 hybrid (Filtek Z250) and 2 packable composite resins (Surefil and Fill Magic), before (baseline) and after eight different finishing and polishing treatments. The surface roughness was assessed using a profilometer. Ten specimens of each composite resin were randomly subjected to one of the following finishing/polishing techniques: A - carbide burs; B - fine/extrafine diamond burs; C - Sof-Lex aluminum oxide discs; D - Super-Snap aluminum oxide discs; E - rubber polishing points + fine/extrafine polishing pastes; F - diamond burs + rubber polishing points + fine/extrafine polishing pastes; G - diamond burs + Sof-Lex system; H - diamond burs + Super-Snap system. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. Significant differences (p<0.05) were detected among both the resins and the finishing/polishing techniques. For all resins, the use of diamond burs resulted in the greatest surface roughness (Ra: 0.69 to 1.44 µm). The lowest Ra means were obtained for the specimens treated with Sof-Lex discs (Ra: 0.11 to 0.25 µm). The Ra values of Durafill were lower than those of Perfection and Filtek Z250, and these in turn had lower Ra than the packable composite resins. Overall, the smoothest surfaces were obtained with the use the complete sequence of Sof-Lex discs. In areas that could not be reached by the aluminum oxide discs, the carbide burs and the association between rubber points and polishing pastes produced satisfactory surface smoothness for the packable and hybrid composite resins, respectively.
id FUNORP-1_afc9984a73add4f1e02950aeccc3d22f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402005000100007
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resinssurface roughnesscomposite resinsfinishing and polishingThis study examined the average surface roughness (Ra, µm) of 2 microfilled (Durafill and Perfection), 1 hybrid (Filtek Z250) and 2 packable composite resins (Surefil and Fill Magic), before (baseline) and after eight different finishing and polishing treatments. The surface roughness was assessed using a profilometer. Ten specimens of each composite resin were randomly subjected to one of the following finishing/polishing techniques: A - carbide burs; B - fine/extrafine diamond burs; C - Sof-Lex aluminum oxide discs; D - Super-Snap aluminum oxide discs; E - rubber polishing points + fine/extrafine polishing pastes; F - diamond burs + rubber polishing points + fine/extrafine polishing pastes; G - diamond burs + Sof-Lex system; H - diamond burs + Super-Snap system. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. Significant differences (p<0.05) were detected among both the resins and the finishing/polishing techniques. For all resins, the use of diamond burs resulted in the greatest surface roughness (Ra: 0.69 to 1.44 µm). The lowest Ra means were obtained for the specimens treated with Sof-Lex discs (Ra: 0.11 to 0.25 µm). The Ra values of Durafill were lower than those of Perfection and Filtek Z250, and these in turn had lower Ra than the packable composite resins. Overall, the smoothest surfaces were obtained with the use the complete sequence of Sof-Lex discs. In areas that could not be reached by the aluminum oxide discs, the carbide burs and the association between rubber points and polishing pastes produced satisfactory surface smoothness for the packable and hybrid composite resins, respectively.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2005-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402005000100007Brazilian Dental Journal v.16 n.1 2005reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402005000100007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbosa,Silvia HelenaZanata,Régia LuziaNavarro,Maria Fidela de LimaNunes,Osvaldo Benonieng2005-08-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402005000100007Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2005-08-17T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins
title Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins
spellingShingle Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins
Barbosa,Silvia Helena
surface roughness
composite resins
finishing and polishing
title_short Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins
title_full Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins
title_fullStr Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins
title_sort Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins
author Barbosa,Silvia Helena
author_facet Barbosa,Silvia Helena
Zanata,Régia Luzia
Navarro,Maria Fidela de Lima
Nunes,Osvaldo Benoni
author_role author
author2 Zanata,Régia Luzia
Navarro,Maria Fidela de Lima
Nunes,Osvaldo Benoni
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbosa,Silvia Helena
Zanata,Régia Luzia
Navarro,Maria Fidela de Lima
Nunes,Osvaldo Benoni
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv surface roughness
composite resins
finishing and polishing
topic surface roughness
composite resins
finishing and polishing
description This study examined the average surface roughness (Ra, µm) of 2 microfilled (Durafill and Perfection), 1 hybrid (Filtek Z250) and 2 packable composite resins (Surefil and Fill Magic), before (baseline) and after eight different finishing and polishing treatments. The surface roughness was assessed using a profilometer. Ten specimens of each composite resin were randomly subjected to one of the following finishing/polishing techniques: A - carbide burs; B - fine/extrafine diamond burs; C - Sof-Lex aluminum oxide discs; D - Super-Snap aluminum oxide discs; E - rubber polishing points + fine/extrafine polishing pastes; F - diamond burs + rubber polishing points + fine/extrafine polishing pastes; G - diamond burs + Sof-Lex system; H - diamond burs + Super-Snap system. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. Significant differences (p<0.05) were detected among both the resins and the finishing/polishing techniques. For all resins, the use of diamond burs resulted in the greatest surface roughness (Ra: 0.69 to 1.44 µm). The lowest Ra means were obtained for the specimens treated with Sof-Lex discs (Ra: 0.11 to 0.25 µm). The Ra values of Durafill were lower than those of Perfection and Filtek Z250, and these in turn had lower Ra than the packable composite resins. Overall, the smoothest surfaces were obtained with the use the complete sequence of Sof-Lex discs. In areas that could not be reached by the aluminum oxide discs, the carbide burs and the association between rubber points and polishing pastes produced satisfactory surface smoothness for the packable and hybrid composite resins, respectively.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402005000100007
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402005000100007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-64402005000100007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.16 n.1 2005
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204090048446464