Similar Sealability Between Bioceramic Putty Ready-To-Use Repair Cement and White MTA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Journal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000400362 |
Resumo: | This study was designed to assess the ability to prevent glucose penetration of a bioceramic putty ready-to-use repair cement comparing to white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA). After root canal instrumentation, the apical 3 mm of maxillary incisors were resected and root-end cavities with depth of 3 mm were prepared with ultrasound and filled with the tested materials (15 roots per group). All roots were mounted in a double chamber system to assess glucose penetration using 15 psi pressure application. After 1 h, glucose concentrations in the lower chamber were measured following an enzymatic reaction. Four roots were used as controls. The Mann-Whitney test verified differences in glucose leakage between groups and the Tukey's test was used for multiple comparisons. Significance level was set at 5%. There was no significant difference in glucose leakage between iRoot BP Plus and White MTA groups. iRoot BP Plus had a similar ability to that of white MTA in preventing glucose leakage as a root-end filling material. |
id |
FUNORP-1_c786c1bc8fd13db771547427a7ed2ca3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-64402013000400362 |
network_acronym_str |
FUNORP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Similar Sealability Between Bioceramic Putty Ready-To-Use Repair Cement and White MTAbioceramic cementMTAroot-end fillingThis study was designed to assess the ability to prevent glucose penetration of a bioceramic putty ready-to-use repair cement comparing to white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA). After root canal instrumentation, the apical 3 mm of maxillary incisors were resected and root-end cavities with depth of 3 mm were prepared with ultrasound and filled with the tested materials (15 roots per group). All roots were mounted in a double chamber system to assess glucose penetration using 15 psi pressure application. After 1 h, glucose concentrations in the lower chamber were measured following an enzymatic reaction. Four roots were used as controls. The Mann-Whitney test verified differences in glucose leakage between groups and the Tukey's test was used for multiple comparisons. Significance level was set at 5%. There was no significant difference in glucose leakage between iRoot BP Plus and White MTA groups. iRoot BP Plus had a similar ability to that of white MTA in preventing glucose leakage as a root-end filling material.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2013-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000400362Brazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.4 2013reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201302051info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeal,FernandaDe-Deus,GustavoBrandao,ClaudiaLuna,AdervalSouza,ErickFidel,Sandraeng2013-10-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402013000400362Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2013-10-16T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Similar Sealability Between Bioceramic Putty Ready-To-Use Repair Cement and White MTA |
title |
Similar Sealability Between Bioceramic Putty Ready-To-Use Repair Cement and White MTA |
spellingShingle |
Similar Sealability Between Bioceramic Putty Ready-To-Use Repair Cement and White MTA Leal,Fernanda bioceramic cement MTA root-end filling |
title_short |
Similar Sealability Between Bioceramic Putty Ready-To-Use Repair Cement and White MTA |
title_full |
Similar Sealability Between Bioceramic Putty Ready-To-Use Repair Cement and White MTA |
title_fullStr |
Similar Sealability Between Bioceramic Putty Ready-To-Use Repair Cement and White MTA |
title_full_unstemmed |
Similar Sealability Between Bioceramic Putty Ready-To-Use Repair Cement and White MTA |
title_sort |
Similar Sealability Between Bioceramic Putty Ready-To-Use Repair Cement and White MTA |
author |
Leal,Fernanda |
author_facet |
Leal,Fernanda De-Deus,Gustavo Brandao,Claudia Luna,Aderval Souza,Erick Fidel,Sandra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
De-Deus,Gustavo Brandao,Claudia Luna,Aderval Souza,Erick Fidel,Sandra |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leal,Fernanda De-Deus,Gustavo Brandao,Claudia Luna,Aderval Souza,Erick Fidel,Sandra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bioceramic cement MTA root-end filling |
topic |
bioceramic cement MTA root-end filling |
description |
This study was designed to assess the ability to prevent glucose penetration of a bioceramic putty ready-to-use repair cement comparing to white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA). After root canal instrumentation, the apical 3 mm of maxillary incisors were resected and root-end cavities with depth of 3 mm were prepared with ultrasound and filled with the tested materials (15 roots per group). All roots were mounted in a double chamber system to assess glucose penetration using 15 psi pressure application. After 1 h, glucose concentrations in the lower chamber were measured following an enzymatic reaction. Four roots were used as controls. The Mann-Whitney test verified differences in glucose leakage between groups and the Tukey's test was used for multiple comparisons. Significance level was set at 5%. There was no significant difference in glucose leakage between iRoot BP Plus and White MTA groups. iRoot BP Plus had a similar ability to that of white MTA in preventing glucose leakage as a root-end filling material. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000400362 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402013000400362 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-6440201302051 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal v.24 n.4 2013 reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) instacron:FUNORP |
instname_str |
Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
instacron_str |
FUNORP |
institution |
FUNORP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Journal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1754204092681420800 |