Internal and Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of Narrow Diameter Dental Implant-Abutment Assembly

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ruschel,George Hebert
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Bacchi,Ataís, Moris,Izabela Cristina Maurício, Poole,Stephanie Francoi, Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria, Gomes,Érica Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402020000200127
Resumo: Abstract The aim of this study was to assess the internal and vertical marginal fit of metallic copings to abutments and the fracture strength of different narrow diameter dental implant/abutments, either submitted to thermomechanical cycling or not. Sixty-four implant/abutments (n=16) were divided into 4 groups according to diameter and abutment type: G3.5-UAC (morse taper implant Ø3.5mm + universal abutment with beveled chamfer finish); G2.9-UAS (morse taper implant Ø2.9mm + universal abutment with shoulder finish); G2.8-AA (morse taper friction implant Ø2.8mm + anatomical abutment) and G2.5-HP (one-piece implant Ø2.5mm with indexed hexagonal platform). Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=8): submitted and not submitted to thermomechanical cycling (TMC). To assess internal and vertical marginal fit of metallic copings, the assemblies were scanned using microtomography (micro-CT) (n=5). The samples were subjected to the compressive strength test on a universal test machine. Group G3.5-UAC showed the highest marginal misfit regardless of TMC (p<0.05). All other groups were similar after TMC. Group G2.8-AA showed the lowest internal misfit both with and without TMC (p<0.05). Group G2.8-AA showed the highest fracture strength, similar only to G2.5-HP without TMC and G3.5-UAC with TMC. The type of abutment affects the internal and marginal fit of metallic copings and the anatomical abutment led to the best internal and marginal coping fit. The narrow diameter dental implant/abutments differ in terms of fracture strength, the strongest assembly was that composed by implant of type V grade titanium without internal threads (friction implant).
id FUNORP-1_ec7ba5832fc1c836b288eb835726604a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402020000200127
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Internal and Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of Narrow Diameter Dental Implant-Abutment Assemblyabutmentscyclical loadingdental implantsfitAbstract The aim of this study was to assess the internal and vertical marginal fit of metallic copings to abutments and the fracture strength of different narrow diameter dental implant/abutments, either submitted to thermomechanical cycling or not. Sixty-four implant/abutments (n=16) were divided into 4 groups according to diameter and abutment type: G3.5-UAC (morse taper implant Ø3.5mm + universal abutment with beveled chamfer finish); G2.9-UAS (morse taper implant Ø2.9mm + universal abutment with shoulder finish); G2.8-AA (morse taper friction implant Ø2.8mm + anatomical abutment) and G2.5-HP (one-piece implant Ø2.5mm with indexed hexagonal platform). Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=8): submitted and not submitted to thermomechanical cycling (TMC). To assess internal and vertical marginal fit of metallic copings, the assemblies were scanned using microtomography (micro-CT) (n=5). The samples were subjected to the compressive strength test on a universal test machine. Group G3.5-UAC showed the highest marginal misfit regardless of TMC (p<0.05). All other groups were similar after TMC. Group G2.8-AA showed the lowest internal misfit both with and without TMC (p<0.05). Group G2.8-AA showed the highest fracture strength, similar only to G2.5-HP without TMC and G3.5-UAC with TMC. The type of abutment affects the internal and marginal fit of metallic copings and the anatomical abutment led to the best internal and marginal coping fit. The narrow diameter dental implant/abutments differ in terms of fracture strength, the strongest assembly was that composed by implant of type V grade titanium without internal threads (friction implant).Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402020000200127Brazilian Dental Journal v.31 n.2 2020reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440202002937info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRuschel,George HebertBacchi,AtaísMoris,Izabela Cristina MaurícioPoole,Stephanie FrancoiRibeiro,Ricardo FariaGomes,Érica Alveseng2020-06-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402020000200127Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2020-06-10T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Internal and Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of Narrow Diameter Dental Implant-Abutment Assembly
title Internal and Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of Narrow Diameter Dental Implant-Abutment Assembly
spellingShingle Internal and Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of Narrow Diameter Dental Implant-Abutment Assembly
Ruschel,George Hebert
abutments
cyclical loading
dental implants
fit
title_short Internal and Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of Narrow Diameter Dental Implant-Abutment Assembly
title_full Internal and Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of Narrow Diameter Dental Implant-Abutment Assembly
title_fullStr Internal and Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of Narrow Diameter Dental Implant-Abutment Assembly
title_full_unstemmed Internal and Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of Narrow Diameter Dental Implant-Abutment Assembly
title_sort Internal and Marginal Fit and Fracture Strength of Narrow Diameter Dental Implant-Abutment Assembly
author Ruschel,George Hebert
author_facet Ruschel,George Hebert
Bacchi,Ataís
Moris,Izabela Cristina Maurício
Poole,Stephanie Francoi
Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria
Gomes,Érica Alves
author_role author
author2 Bacchi,Ataís
Moris,Izabela Cristina Maurício
Poole,Stephanie Francoi
Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria
Gomes,Érica Alves
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ruschel,George Hebert
Bacchi,Ataís
Moris,Izabela Cristina Maurício
Poole,Stephanie Francoi
Ribeiro,Ricardo Faria
Gomes,Érica Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv abutments
cyclical loading
dental implants
fit
topic abutments
cyclical loading
dental implants
fit
description Abstract The aim of this study was to assess the internal and vertical marginal fit of metallic copings to abutments and the fracture strength of different narrow diameter dental implant/abutments, either submitted to thermomechanical cycling or not. Sixty-four implant/abutments (n=16) were divided into 4 groups according to diameter and abutment type: G3.5-UAC (morse taper implant Ø3.5mm + universal abutment with beveled chamfer finish); G2.9-UAS (morse taper implant Ø2.9mm + universal abutment with shoulder finish); G2.8-AA (morse taper friction implant Ø2.8mm + anatomical abutment) and G2.5-HP (one-piece implant Ø2.5mm with indexed hexagonal platform). Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=8): submitted and not submitted to thermomechanical cycling (TMC). To assess internal and vertical marginal fit of metallic copings, the assemblies were scanned using microtomography (micro-CT) (n=5). The samples were subjected to the compressive strength test on a universal test machine. Group G3.5-UAC showed the highest marginal misfit regardless of TMC (p<0.05). All other groups were similar after TMC. Group G2.8-AA showed the lowest internal misfit both with and without TMC (p<0.05). Group G2.8-AA showed the highest fracture strength, similar only to G2.5-HP without TMC and G3.5-UAC with TMC. The type of abutment affects the internal and marginal fit of metallic copings and the anatomical abutment led to the best internal and marginal coping fit. The narrow diameter dental implant/abutments differ in terms of fracture strength, the strongest assembly was that composed by implant of type V grade titanium without internal threads (friction implant).
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402020000200127
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402020000200127
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440202002937
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.31 n.2 2020
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204095797788672