Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Renata Cristiane da
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Zuanon,Angela Cristina Cilense
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000200004
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of four conventional chemically cured glass ionomer cements (Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, Vidrion R and Vitromolar) commonly used in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) immediately after material preparation. Twenty specimens of each glass ionomer cement were fabricated and surface roughness was measured after material setting. The specimens were further examined under scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test at 5% significance level. Two-by-two comparisons showed statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between all materials, except for Ketac Molar and Vidrion R, which had statically similar results (p>0.05). Regarding their results of surface roughness, the materials can be presented in a crescent order, as follows: Ketac Molar < Vidrion R < Fuji IX < Vitromolar. In conclusion, from the tested glass ionomer cements, Fuji IX, Ketac Molar and Vidrion R presented acceptable surface roughness after setting reaction while Vitromolar showed remarkably higher surface roughness.
id FUNORP-1_ecc8318cd6fda777907c39dbde34b1d1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402006000200004
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)glass ionomer cementatraumatic restorative treatmentsurface roughnessThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of four conventional chemically cured glass ionomer cements (Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, Vidrion R and Vitromolar) commonly used in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) immediately after material preparation. Twenty specimens of each glass ionomer cement were fabricated and surface roughness was measured after material setting. The specimens were further examined under scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test at 5% significance level. Two-by-two comparisons showed statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between all materials, except for Ketac Molar and Vidrion R, which had statically similar results (p>0.05). Regarding their results of surface roughness, the materials can be presented in a crescent order, as follows: Ketac Molar < Vidrion R < Fuji IX < Vitromolar. In conclusion, from the tested glass ionomer cements, Fuji IX, Ketac Molar and Vidrion R presented acceptable surface roughness after setting reaction while Vitromolar showed remarkably higher surface roughness.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2006-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000200004Brazilian Dental Journal v.17 n.2 2006reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/S0103-64402006000200004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Renata Cristiane daZuanon,Angela Cristina Cilenseeng2006-08-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402006000200004Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2006-08-14T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
title Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
spellingShingle Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
Silva,Renata Cristiane da
glass ionomer cement
atraumatic restorative treatment
surface roughness
title_short Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
title_full Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
title_fullStr Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
title_full_unstemmed Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
title_sort Surface roughness of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
author Silva,Renata Cristiane da
author_facet Silva,Renata Cristiane da
Zuanon,Angela Cristina Cilense
author_role author
author2 Zuanon,Angela Cristina Cilense
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Renata Cristiane da
Zuanon,Angela Cristina Cilense
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv glass ionomer cement
atraumatic restorative treatment
surface roughness
topic glass ionomer cement
atraumatic restorative treatment
surface roughness
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of four conventional chemically cured glass ionomer cements (Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, Vidrion R and Vitromolar) commonly used in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) immediately after material preparation. Twenty specimens of each glass ionomer cement were fabricated and surface roughness was measured after material setting. The specimens were further examined under scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test at 5% significance level. Two-by-two comparisons showed statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between all materials, except for Ketac Molar and Vidrion R, which had statically similar results (p>0.05). Regarding their results of surface roughness, the materials can be presented in a crescent order, as follows: Ketac Molar < Vidrion R < Fuji IX < Vitromolar. In conclusion, from the tested glass ionomer cements, Fuji IX, Ketac Molar and Vidrion R presented acceptable surface roughness after setting reaction while Vitromolar showed remarkably higher surface roughness.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000200004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402006000200004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-64402006000200004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.17 n.2 2006
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204090143866880