“In vitro” surface roughness of different glass ionomer cements indicated for ART restorations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641841 |
Resumo: | Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of three glass ionomer cements (GICs) indicated for ART restorations. Methods: Ten cylindrical specimens of three commercial glass ionomers cements (Vidrion R - S.S. White, Maxxion R - FGM and Vitromolar DFL) were prepared (n=30) without surface finishing or protection. Twenty-four hours after preparation, the surface roughness measurements were obtained as the mean of three readings of the surface of each specimen by profilometry. The roughness values (Ra, µm) were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between Vidrion R (0.18 ± 0.05) and Vitromolar (0.21 ± 0.05), whereas Maxxion R presented significantly higher roughness values than those of the other materials. Conclusions: It may be concluded that characteristics of particle size and composition of the different GICs affected their surface roughness 24 h after preparation. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_69318f1bcfd676bf6ace3b1b25963aed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641841 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
“In vitro” surface roughness of different glass ionomer cements indicated for ART restorationsRoughnessProfilometryGlass ionomer cementsARTRestorative dental materialsOdontologyAim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of three glass ionomer cements (GICs) indicated for ART restorations. Methods: Ten cylindrical specimens of three commercial glass ionomers cements (Vidrion R - S.S. White, Maxxion R - FGM and Vitromolar DFL) were prepared (n=30) without surface finishing or protection. Twenty-four hours after preparation, the surface roughness measurements were obtained as the mean of three readings of the surface of each specimen by profilometry. The roughness values (Ra, µm) were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between Vidrion R (0.18 ± 0.05) and Vitromolar (0.21 ± 0.05), whereas Maxxion R presented significantly higher roughness values than those of the other materials. Conclusions: It may be concluded that characteristics of particle size and composition of the different GICs affected their surface roughness 24 h after preparation.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/864184110.20396/bjos.v9i2.8641841Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 9 n. 2 (2010): Apr./Jun.; 77-80Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2010): Apr./Jun.; 77-801677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641841/9340Momesso, Marília Gabriela CorrêaSilva, Renata Cristiane daImparato, José Carlos PettorossiMolina, CelsoNavarro, Ricardo ScarparoRibeiro, Sidney José Limainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-25T08:43:20Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641841Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2015-11-25T08:43:20Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“In vitro” surface roughness of different glass ionomer cements indicated for ART restorations |
title |
“In vitro” surface roughness of different glass ionomer cements indicated for ART restorations |
spellingShingle |
“In vitro” surface roughness of different glass ionomer cements indicated for ART restorations Momesso, Marília Gabriela Corrêa Roughness Profilometry Glass ionomer cements ART Restorative dental materials Odontology |
title_short |
“In vitro” surface roughness of different glass ionomer cements indicated for ART restorations |
title_full |
“In vitro” surface roughness of different glass ionomer cements indicated for ART restorations |
title_fullStr |
“In vitro” surface roughness of different glass ionomer cements indicated for ART restorations |
title_full_unstemmed |
“In vitro” surface roughness of different glass ionomer cements indicated for ART restorations |
title_sort |
“In vitro” surface roughness of different glass ionomer cements indicated for ART restorations |
author |
Momesso, Marília Gabriela Corrêa |
author_facet |
Momesso, Marília Gabriela Corrêa Silva, Renata Cristiane da Imparato, José Carlos Pettorossi Molina, Celso Navarro, Ricardo Scarparo Ribeiro, Sidney José Lima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Renata Cristiane da Imparato, José Carlos Pettorossi Molina, Celso Navarro, Ricardo Scarparo Ribeiro, Sidney José Lima |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Momesso, Marília Gabriela Corrêa Silva, Renata Cristiane da Imparato, José Carlos Pettorossi Molina, Celso Navarro, Ricardo Scarparo Ribeiro, Sidney José Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Roughness Profilometry Glass ionomer cements ART Restorative dental materials Odontology |
topic |
Roughness Profilometry Glass ionomer cements ART Restorative dental materials Odontology |
description |
Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of three glass ionomer cements (GICs) indicated for ART restorations. Methods: Ten cylindrical specimens of three commercial glass ionomers cements (Vidrion R - S.S. White, Maxxion R - FGM and Vitromolar DFL) were prepared (n=30) without surface finishing or protection. Twenty-four hours after preparation, the surface roughness measurements were obtained as the mean of three readings of the surface of each specimen by profilometry. The roughness values (Ra, µm) were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between Vidrion R (0.18 ± 0.05) and Vitromolar (0.21 ± 0.05), whereas Maxxion R presented significantly higher roughness values than those of the other materials. Conclusions: It may be concluded that characteristics of particle size and composition of the different GICs affected their surface roughness 24 h after preparation. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641841 10.20396/bjos.v9i2.8641841 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641841 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v9i2.8641841 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641841/9340 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 9 n. 2 (2010): Apr./Jun.; 77-80 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2010): Apr./Jun.; 77-80 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216400042655744 |