RIGHT TO FOOD AND “TRAGEDY†OF THE COMMONS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista jurídica (Blumenau. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/juridica/article/view/5777 |
Resumo: | Without claiming of exhaustivity, this work aims at verifying the possibility to consider food as a common good from a juridical perspective. In fact, it seems that so far the Italian constitutional doctrine has not covered this particular aspect – anything but irrelevant – in the studies dealing with these theories. Therefore, I will try hereafter to make some short reflections from a constitutional perspective, with the purpose of showing the quantity of difficulties that can be encountered if one considers this hypothesis, i.e. if one places the right to food not only beyond the «private», but also beyond the «public» dimension provided by the Constitution. Ultimately, after identifying some critical aspects of the doctrines of common goods, I will try to examine the possibility to guarantee all people the fundamental right to access to food by using the «public utilities made available by the local government». Otherwise, if we let the laws of the market be the ones that can guarantee food, we risk legitimizing a “juridical paradox†that the constitutional order (at least the Italian one) by no means can tolerate. |
id |
FURB-8_7c4b57543bcf89ef3294432727df30c2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.bu.furb.br:article/5777 |
network_acronym_str |
FURB-8 |
network_name_str |
Revista jurídica (Blumenau. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
RIGHT TO FOOD AND “TRAGEDY†OF THE COMMONSCommon goodsItalian Constitutionmodern constitutionalismAndean nuevo constitucionalismoright to foodright to waterpublic utilities made available by the local governmentWithout claiming of exhaustivity, this work aims at verifying the possibility to consider food as a common good from a juridical perspective. In fact, it seems that so far the Italian constitutional doctrine has not covered this particular aspect – anything but irrelevant – in the studies dealing with these theories. Therefore, I will try hereafter to make some short reflections from a constitutional perspective, with the purpose of showing the quantity of difficulties that can be encountered if one considers this hypothesis, i.e. if one places the right to food not only beyond the «private», but also beyond the «public» dimension provided by the Constitution. Ultimately, after identifying some critical aspects of the doctrines of common goods, I will try to examine the possibility to guarantee all people the fundamental right to access to food by using the «public utilities made available by the local government». Otherwise, if we let the laws of the market be the ones that can guarantee food, we risk legitimizing a “juridical paradox†that the constitutional order (at least the Italian one) by no means can tolerate.Revista Jurídica (FURB)Revista Jurídica (FURB)2016-10-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/juridica/article/view/5777Revista Jurídica (FURB); Vol. 20 No. 41 (2016); 5-34Revista Jurídica (FURB); v. 20 n. 41 (2016); 5-341982-4858reponame:Revista jurídica (Blumenau. Online)instname:Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB)instacron:FURBporhttps://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/juridica/article/view/5777/3399Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Jurídicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGusmai, Antonio2017-06-13T22:42:07Zoai:ojs.bu.furb.br:article/5777Revistahttps://proxy.furb.br/ojs/index.php/juridica/indexPUBhttps://proxy.furb.br/ojs/index.php/juridica/oai||revistajuridica@furb.br1982-48581415-255Xopendoar:2017-06-13T22:42:07Revista jurídica (Blumenau. Online) - Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
RIGHT TO FOOD AND “TRAGEDY†OF THE COMMONS |
title |
RIGHT TO FOOD AND “TRAGEDY†OF THE COMMONS |
spellingShingle |
RIGHT TO FOOD AND “TRAGEDY†OF THE COMMONS Gusmai, Antonio Common goods Italian Constitution modern constitutionalism Andean nuevo constitucionalismo right to food right to water public utilities made available by the local government |
title_short |
RIGHT TO FOOD AND “TRAGEDY†OF THE COMMONS |
title_full |
RIGHT TO FOOD AND “TRAGEDY†OF THE COMMONS |
title_fullStr |
RIGHT TO FOOD AND “TRAGEDY†OF THE COMMONS |
title_full_unstemmed |
RIGHT TO FOOD AND “TRAGEDY†OF THE COMMONS |
title_sort |
RIGHT TO FOOD AND “TRAGEDY†OF THE COMMONS |
author |
Gusmai, Antonio |
author_facet |
Gusmai, Antonio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gusmai, Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Common goods Italian Constitution modern constitutionalism Andean nuevo constitucionalismo right to food right to water public utilities made available by the local government |
topic |
Common goods Italian Constitution modern constitutionalism Andean nuevo constitucionalismo right to food right to water public utilities made available by the local government |
description |
Without claiming of exhaustivity, this work aims at verifying the possibility to consider food as a common good from a juridical perspective. In fact, it seems that so far the Italian constitutional doctrine has not covered this particular aspect – anything but irrelevant – in the studies dealing with these theories. Therefore, I will try hereafter to make some short reflections from a constitutional perspective, with the purpose of showing the quantity of difficulties that can be encountered if one considers this hypothesis, i.e. if one places the right to food not only beyond the «private», but also beyond the «public» dimension provided by the Constitution. Ultimately, after identifying some critical aspects of the doctrines of common goods, I will try to examine the possibility to guarantee all people the fundamental right to access to food by using the «public utilities made available by the local government». Otherwise, if we let the laws of the market be the ones that can guarantee food, we risk legitimizing a “juridical paradox†that the constitutional order (at least the Italian one) by no means can tolerate. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/juridica/article/view/5777 |
url |
https://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/juridica/article/view/5777 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojsrevista.furb.br/ojs/index.php/juridica/article/view/5777/3399 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Jurídica info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Jurídica |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica (FURB) Revista Jurídica (FURB) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica (FURB) Revista Jurídica (FURB) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica (FURB); Vol. 20 No. 41 (2016); 5-34 Revista Jurídica (FURB); v. 20 n. 41 (2016); 5-34 1982-4858 reponame:Revista jurídica (Blumenau. Online) instname:Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB) instacron:FURB |
instname_str |
Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB) |
instacron_str |
FURB |
institution |
FURB |
reponame_str |
Revista jurídica (Blumenau. Online) |
collection |
Revista jurídica (Blumenau. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista jurídica (Blumenau. Online) - Universidade Regional de Blumenau (FURB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistajuridica@furb.br |
_version_ |
1798945241070305280 |