Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fillmann, Gilberto
Data de Publicação: 2002
Outros Autores: Galloway, Tamara, Sanger, Ross, Depledge, Michael, Readman, James
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/2175
Resumo: Results from polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) analyses of mussel tissue extracts by immunoassay (PCB RaPID Assay®) and conventional gas chromatography–electron-capture detection (GC–ECD) are described and compared. Mussels from natural populations with diverse concentrations of PCBs, mussel tissue fortified with technical Aroclor® 1254 and a certified reference material are included.A strong correlation is reported between “total” PCBs quantified by both techniques (r2 = 0.95, n = 27). Immunoassay results, however, exhibited lower values compared to GC–ECD, particularly when GC results are corrected for procedural recovery. A reduced antibody response, due to differences in the congener composition between the mussel extracts and Aroclor® 1254 (used to raise and calibrate the ELISA), provides the most likely explanation for this difference. Non-parametric statistical analyses confirmed that,although differing from Aroclor® 1254, PCB congener compositions in the mussel extracts most closely resemble that of Aroclor® 1254. At very high PCB concentrations (>30 g g−1 dry weight), however, ELISA results are statistically different (P < 0.01) from GC–ECD results, which is likely to be related to the solvation capacity of ELISA diluent. Similarity analysis showed high correlations between the most prominent congeners in Aroclor® 1254 and immunoassay results. This analysis did not, however, identify a specific chlorine substitution pattern to which the immunoassay preferentially responded. Whilst GC–ECD affords the capability to quantify individual congeners of different reactivity and toxicity, the data reported do indicate that immunoassay offers a rapid and inexpensive alternative method for estimation of “total” PCBs at environmental significant levels. It is, however, necessary to remove extraneous lipids to reduce matrix effects in the immunoassay.
id FURG_589c1131f815207f73c9455f18815cba
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.furg.br:1/2175
network_acronym_str FURG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)
repository_id_str
spelling Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissuesImmunoassayELISAPCBsMusselGC–ECDMethodologyResults from polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) analyses of mussel tissue extracts by immunoassay (PCB RaPID Assay®) and conventional gas chromatography–electron-capture detection (GC–ECD) are described and compared. Mussels from natural populations with diverse concentrations of PCBs, mussel tissue fortified with technical Aroclor® 1254 and a certified reference material are included.A strong correlation is reported between “total” PCBs quantified by both techniques (r2 = 0.95, n = 27). Immunoassay results, however, exhibited lower values compared to GC–ECD, particularly when GC results are corrected for procedural recovery. A reduced antibody response, due to differences in the congener composition between the mussel extracts and Aroclor® 1254 (used to raise and calibrate the ELISA), provides the most likely explanation for this difference. Non-parametric statistical analyses confirmed that,although differing from Aroclor® 1254, PCB congener compositions in the mussel extracts most closely resemble that of Aroclor® 1254. At very high PCB concentrations (>30 g g−1 dry weight), however, ELISA results are statistically different (P < 0.01) from GC–ECD results, which is likely to be related to the solvation capacity of ELISA diluent. Similarity analysis showed high correlations between the most prominent congeners in Aroclor® 1254 and immunoassay results. This analysis did not, however, identify a specific chlorine substitution pattern to which the immunoassay preferentially responded. Whilst GC–ECD affords the capability to quantify individual congeners of different reactivity and toxicity, the data reported do indicate that immunoassay offers a rapid and inexpensive alternative method for estimation of “total” PCBs at environmental significant levels. It is, however, necessary to remove extraneous lipids to reduce matrix effects in the immunoassay.2012-07-24T23:35:12Z2012-07-24T23:35:12Z2002info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfFILLMANN, Gilberto, et al. Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues. Analytica Chimica Acta, v. 461, n.1, p. 75-84, 2002. Disponível em: <http://144.206.159.178/ft/38/63778/1085141.pdf>. Acesso em: 21 jul. 2012.http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/2175engFillmann, GilbertoGalloway, TamaraSanger, RossDepledge, MichaelReadman, Jamesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)instacron:FURG2012-07-24T23:35:12Zoai:repositorio.furg.br:1/2175Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.furg.br/oai/request || http://200.19.254.174/oai/requestopendoar:2012-07-24T23:35:12Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues
title Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues
spellingShingle Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues
Fillmann, Gilberto
Immunoassay
ELISA
PCBs
Mussel
GC–ECD
Methodology
title_short Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues
title_full Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues
title_fullStr Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues
title_full_unstemmed Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues
title_sort Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues
author Fillmann, Gilberto
author_facet Fillmann, Gilberto
Galloway, Tamara
Sanger, Ross
Depledge, Michael
Readman, James
author_role author
author2 Galloway, Tamara
Sanger, Ross
Depledge, Michael
Readman, James
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fillmann, Gilberto
Galloway, Tamara
Sanger, Ross
Depledge, Michael
Readman, James
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Immunoassay
ELISA
PCBs
Mussel
GC–ECD
Methodology
topic Immunoassay
ELISA
PCBs
Mussel
GC–ECD
Methodology
description Results from polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) analyses of mussel tissue extracts by immunoassay (PCB RaPID Assay®) and conventional gas chromatography–electron-capture detection (GC–ECD) are described and compared. Mussels from natural populations with diverse concentrations of PCBs, mussel tissue fortified with technical Aroclor® 1254 and a certified reference material are included.A strong correlation is reported between “total” PCBs quantified by both techniques (r2 = 0.95, n = 27). Immunoassay results, however, exhibited lower values compared to GC–ECD, particularly when GC results are corrected for procedural recovery. A reduced antibody response, due to differences in the congener composition between the mussel extracts and Aroclor® 1254 (used to raise and calibrate the ELISA), provides the most likely explanation for this difference. Non-parametric statistical analyses confirmed that,although differing from Aroclor® 1254, PCB congener compositions in the mussel extracts most closely resemble that of Aroclor® 1254. At very high PCB concentrations (>30 g g−1 dry weight), however, ELISA results are statistically different (P < 0.01) from GC–ECD results, which is likely to be related to the solvation capacity of ELISA diluent. Similarity analysis showed high correlations between the most prominent congeners in Aroclor® 1254 and immunoassay results. This analysis did not, however, identify a specific chlorine substitution pattern to which the immunoassay preferentially responded. Whilst GC–ECD affords the capability to quantify individual congeners of different reactivity and toxicity, the data reported do indicate that immunoassay offers a rapid and inexpensive alternative method for estimation of “total” PCBs at environmental significant levels. It is, however, necessary to remove extraneous lipids to reduce matrix effects in the immunoassay.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002
2012-07-24T23:35:12Z
2012-07-24T23:35:12Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv FILLMANN, Gilberto, et al. Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues. Analytica Chimica Acta, v. 461, n.1, p. 75-84, 2002. Disponível em: <http://144.206.159.178/ft/38/63778/1085141.pdf>. Acesso em: 21 jul. 2012.
http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/2175
identifier_str_mv FILLMANN, Gilberto, et al. Relative performance of immunochemical (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) and gas chromatography–electron-capture detection techniques to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls in mussel tissues. Analytica Chimica Acta, v. 461, n.1, p. 75-84, 2002. Disponível em: <http://144.206.159.178/ft/38/63778/1085141.pdf>. Acesso em: 21 jul. 2012.
url http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/2175
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)
instacron:FURG
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)
instacron_str FURG
institution FURG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)
collection Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da FURG (RI FURG) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1813187247170650112