Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/96 |
Resumo: | There are different types of implant connections and there is no consensus on the best connection profile for preserving peri-implant bone tissue. Therefore, this systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to analyze the rate of implant loss and level of bone remodeling in implants with different types of connections (Morse taper and external hexagon). The PubMed / Medline, Cochrane Collaboration and SciELO databases were analyzed in order to select the appropriate articles. This review was recorded on the PROSPERO database (CRD42017075429). The data were organized in tables and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software, being considered as a significant value of p <0.05. The data collected indicated that the failure rate of Morse taper implants (2.6%) was very close to the failure rate of external hexagon implants (3.0%), as well as no significant difference was found in bone loss rates. marginal, when both types of connections were compared, p = 0.556 over an average period of 12 to 60 months. It was concluded that both connections are viable and that more controlled and randomized clinical studies are needed to assess the theme. |
id |
GOE-1_5a73511f89b33397d62d8a5c9ad7082f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/96 |
network_acronym_str |
GOE-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis.Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis.Dental implants; Review; Bone tissue.Dental implants; Review; Bone tissue.There are different types of implant connections and there is no consensus on the best connection profile for preserving peri-implant bone tissue. Therefore, this systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to analyze the rate of implant loss and level of bone remodeling in implants with different types of connections (Morse taper and external hexagon). The PubMed / Medline, Cochrane Collaboration and SciELO databases were analyzed in order to select the appropriate articles. This review was recorded on the PROSPERO database (CRD42017075429). The data were organized in tables and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software, being considered as a significant value of p <0.05. The data collected indicated that the failure rate of Morse taper implants (2.6%) was very close to the failure rate of external hexagon implants (3.0%), as well as no significant difference was found in bone loss rates. marginal, when both types of connections were compared, p = 0.556 over an average period of 12 to 60 months. It was concluded that both connections are viable and that more controlled and randomized clinical studies are needed to assess the theme.There are different types of implant connections and there is no consensus on the best connection profile for preserving peri-implant bone tissue. Therefore, this systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to analyze the rate of implant loss and level of bone remodeling in implants with different types of connections (Morse taper and external hexagon). The PubMed / Medline, Cochrane Collaboration and SciELO databases were analyzed in order to select the appropriate articles. This review was recorded on the PROSPERO database (CRD42017075429). The data were organized in tables and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software, being considered as a significant value of p <0.05. The data collected indicated that the failure rate of Morse taper implants (2.6%) was very close to the failure rate of external hexagon implants (3.0%), as well as no significant difference was found in bone loss rates. marginal, when both types of connections were compared, p = 0.556 over an average period of 12 to 60 months. It was concluded that both connections are viable and that more controlled and randomized clinical studies are needed to assess the theme.Specialized Dentistry Group2020-07-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/96Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 2 No. 7 (2020): July; 31-32Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 2 Núm. 7 (2020): Julho; 31-32Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 2 n. 7 (2020): Julho; 31-322674-8169reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciencesinstname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)instacron:GOEenghttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/96/135Copyright (c) 2020 Amanda Cunha Melo, Mauro Silva Cantoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha Melo, Amanda Silva Canto, Mauro 2020-07-16T09:02:41Zoai:ojs.bjihs.emnuvens.com.br:article/96Revistahttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihsONGhttps://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/oaijournal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br2674-81692674-8169opendoar:2020-07-16T09:02:41Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis. Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis. |
title |
Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis. |
spellingShingle |
Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis. Cunha Melo, Amanda Dental implants; Review; Bone tissue. Dental implants; Review; Bone tissue. |
title_short |
Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis. |
title_full |
Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis. |
title_fullStr |
Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis. |
title_sort |
Influence of implant connections on the expansion of dental implants: systematic review with meta-analysis. |
author |
Cunha Melo, Amanda |
author_facet |
Cunha Melo, Amanda Silva Canto, Mauro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva Canto, Mauro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cunha Melo, Amanda Silva Canto, Mauro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental implants; Review; Bone tissue. Dental implants; Review; Bone tissue. |
topic |
Dental implants; Review; Bone tissue. Dental implants; Review; Bone tissue. |
description |
There are different types of implant connections and there is no consensus on the best connection profile for preserving peri-implant bone tissue. Therefore, this systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to analyze the rate of implant loss and level of bone remodeling in implants with different types of connections (Morse taper and external hexagon). The PubMed / Medline, Cochrane Collaboration and SciELO databases were analyzed in order to select the appropriate articles. This review was recorded on the PROSPERO database (CRD42017075429). The data were organized in tables and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software, being considered as a significant value of p <0.05. The data collected indicated that the failure rate of Morse taper implants (2.6%) was very close to the failure rate of external hexagon implants (3.0%), as well as no significant difference was found in bone loss rates. marginal, when both types of connections were compared, p = 0.556 over an average period of 12 to 60 months. It was concluded that both connections are viable and that more controlled and randomized clinical studies are needed to assess the theme. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/96 |
url |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/96 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bjihs.emnuvens.com.br/bjihs/article/view/96/135 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Amanda Cunha Melo, Mauro Silva Canto info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Amanda Cunha Melo, Mauro Silva Canto |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Specialized Dentistry Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Specialized Dentistry Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 2 No. 7 (2020): July; 31-32 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; Vol. 2 Núm. 7 (2020): Julho; 31-32 Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences ; v. 2 n. 7 (2020): Julho; 31-32 2674-8169 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences instname:Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) instacron:GOE |
instname_str |
Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) |
instacron_str |
GOE |
institution |
GOE |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences - Grupo de Odontologia Especializada (GOE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
journal.bjihs@periodicosbrasil.com.br |
_version_ |
1796798448254582784 |