Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Luvizuto, Eloa Rodrigues [UNESP], Sonoda, Celso Koogi [UNESP], Okamoto, Roberta [UNESP], Garcia-Junior, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162786
Resumo: Purpose The installation of implants has become a routine procedure in the clinic. However, it takes time and adequate bone thickness, and for that, tissue engineering has made efforts to develop substitutes for autografts, in view of certain disadvantages of this material. The decision to choose the most suitable graft material for each case is an important step in the success of bone reconstruction. This study was to verify, by means of immunohistochemical study, that the addition of bone morphogenetic protein had some influence on biomaterials commercially available, taking into account the formation of mineralized tissue, bone replacement, and the amount of degradation of biomaterials. Methods The sample consisted of 72 rats that were divided into eight treatment groups, in which two defects of 5 mm were made in each animal calvaria. Euthanasia was performed at 5, 15, and 30 days postop. Results A histologic and histometric analysis was performed to quantitate the area of mineralized tissue formed, the area of newly formed bone, and the area of degradation of the biomaterials. Data were analyzed with multiple comparisons of means by Tukey contrasts, and significant difference was assigned at the level of P < 0.05. The proteins used for immunohistochemical analysis accounted for the process of formation, mineralization, and bone resorption and was performed using ordinal qualitative analysis, where from assigning scores. Conclusions Bone morphogenetic protein 2 was shown to be effective as an inducer of bone formation process independent biomaterial used mainly for accelerating the resorption process of the framework.
id UNSP_be32f8db5ce47daa61a2090afd17cf3e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/162786
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in ratsBone regenerationTissue scaffoldsDental implantsRatsPurpose The installation of implants has become a routine procedure in the clinic. However, it takes time and adequate bone thickness, and for that, tissue engineering has made efforts to develop substitutes for autografts, in view of certain disadvantages of this material. The decision to choose the most suitable graft material for each case is an important step in the success of bone reconstruction. This study was to verify, by means of immunohistochemical study, that the addition of bone morphogenetic protein had some influence on biomaterials commercially available, taking into account the formation of mineralized tissue, bone replacement, and the amount of degradation of biomaterials. Methods The sample consisted of 72 rats that were divided into eight treatment groups, in which two defects of 5 mm were made in each animal calvaria. Euthanasia was performed at 5, 15, and 30 days postop. Results A histologic and histometric analysis was performed to quantitate the area of mineralized tissue formed, the area of newly formed bone, and the area of degradation of the biomaterials. Data were analyzed with multiple comparisons of means by Tukey contrasts, and significant difference was assigned at the level of P < 0.05. The proteins used for immunohistochemical analysis accounted for the process of formation, mineralization, and bone resorption and was performed using ordinal qualitative analysis, where from assigning scores. Conclusions Bone morphogenetic protein 2 was shown to be effective as an inducer of bone formation process independent biomaterial used mainly for accelerating the resorption process of the framework.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Surg & Integrated Clin, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Aracatuba, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Surg & Integrated Clin, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Aracatuba, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2008/10516-6SpringerUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP]Luvizuto, Eloa Rodrigues [UNESP]Sonoda, Celso Koogi [UNESP]Okamoto, Roberta [UNESP]Garcia-Junior, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]2018-11-26T17:31:23Z2018-11-26T17:31:23Z2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article247-258application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery-heidelberg. Heidelberg: Springer Heidelberg, v. 21, n. 2, p. 247-258, 2017.1865-1550http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16278610.1007/s10006-017-0624-3WOS:000401148800015WOS000401148800015.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOral And Maxillofacial Surgery-heidelberg0,471info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T13:30:01Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/162786Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T13:30:01Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats
title Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats
spellingShingle Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats
Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP]
Bone regeneration
Tissue scaffolds
Dental implants
Rats
title_short Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats
title_full Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats
title_fullStr Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats
title_full_unstemmed Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats
title_sort Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats
author Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP]
author_facet Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP]
Luvizuto, Eloa Rodrigues [UNESP]
Sonoda, Celso Koogi [UNESP]
Okamoto, Roberta [UNESP]
Garcia-Junior, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Luvizuto, Eloa Rodrigues [UNESP]
Sonoda, Celso Koogi [UNESP]
Okamoto, Roberta [UNESP]
Garcia-Junior, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP]
Luvizuto, Eloa Rodrigues [UNESP]
Sonoda, Celso Koogi [UNESP]
Okamoto, Roberta [UNESP]
Garcia-Junior, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone regeneration
Tissue scaffolds
Dental implants
Rats
topic Bone regeneration
Tissue scaffolds
Dental implants
Rats
description Purpose The installation of implants has become a routine procedure in the clinic. However, it takes time and adequate bone thickness, and for that, tissue engineering has made efforts to develop substitutes for autografts, in view of certain disadvantages of this material. The decision to choose the most suitable graft material for each case is an important step in the success of bone reconstruction. This study was to verify, by means of immunohistochemical study, that the addition of bone morphogenetic protein had some influence on biomaterials commercially available, taking into account the formation of mineralized tissue, bone replacement, and the amount of degradation of biomaterials. Methods The sample consisted of 72 rats that were divided into eight treatment groups, in which two defects of 5 mm were made in each animal calvaria. Euthanasia was performed at 5, 15, and 30 days postop. Results A histologic and histometric analysis was performed to quantitate the area of mineralized tissue formed, the area of newly formed bone, and the area of degradation of the biomaterials. Data were analyzed with multiple comparisons of means by Tukey contrasts, and significant difference was assigned at the level of P < 0.05. The proteins used for immunohistochemical analysis accounted for the process of formation, mineralization, and bone resorption and was performed using ordinal qualitative analysis, where from assigning scores. Conclusions Bone morphogenetic protein 2 was shown to be effective as an inducer of bone formation process independent biomaterial used mainly for accelerating the resorption process of the framework.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-01
2018-11-26T17:31:23Z
2018-11-26T17:31:23Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery-heidelberg. Heidelberg: Springer Heidelberg, v. 21, n. 2, p. 247-258, 2017.
1865-1550
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162786
10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3
WOS:000401148800015
WOS000401148800015.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162786
identifier_str_mv Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery-heidelberg. Heidelberg: Springer Heidelberg, v. 21, n. 2, p. 247-258, 2017.
1865-1550
10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3
WOS:000401148800015
WOS000401148800015.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery-heidelberg
0,471
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 247-258
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546387602669568