Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162786 |
Resumo: | Purpose The installation of implants has become a routine procedure in the clinic. However, it takes time and adequate bone thickness, and for that, tissue engineering has made efforts to develop substitutes for autografts, in view of certain disadvantages of this material. The decision to choose the most suitable graft material for each case is an important step in the success of bone reconstruction. This study was to verify, by means of immunohistochemical study, that the addition of bone morphogenetic protein had some influence on biomaterials commercially available, taking into account the formation of mineralized tissue, bone replacement, and the amount of degradation of biomaterials. Methods The sample consisted of 72 rats that were divided into eight treatment groups, in which two defects of 5 mm were made in each animal calvaria. Euthanasia was performed at 5, 15, and 30 days postop. Results A histologic and histometric analysis was performed to quantitate the area of mineralized tissue formed, the area of newly formed bone, and the area of degradation of the biomaterials. Data were analyzed with multiple comparisons of means by Tukey contrasts, and significant difference was assigned at the level of P < 0.05. The proteins used for immunohistochemical analysis accounted for the process of formation, mineralization, and bone resorption and was performed using ordinal qualitative analysis, where from assigning scores. Conclusions Bone morphogenetic protein 2 was shown to be effective as an inducer of bone formation process independent biomaterial used mainly for accelerating the resorption process of the framework. |
id |
UNSP_be32f8db5ce47daa61a2090afd17cf3e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/162786 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in ratsBone regenerationTissue scaffoldsDental implantsRatsPurpose The installation of implants has become a routine procedure in the clinic. However, it takes time and adequate bone thickness, and for that, tissue engineering has made efforts to develop substitutes for autografts, in view of certain disadvantages of this material. The decision to choose the most suitable graft material for each case is an important step in the success of bone reconstruction. This study was to verify, by means of immunohistochemical study, that the addition of bone morphogenetic protein had some influence on biomaterials commercially available, taking into account the formation of mineralized tissue, bone replacement, and the amount of degradation of biomaterials. Methods The sample consisted of 72 rats that were divided into eight treatment groups, in which two defects of 5 mm were made in each animal calvaria. Euthanasia was performed at 5, 15, and 30 days postop. Results A histologic and histometric analysis was performed to quantitate the area of mineralized tissue formed, the area of newly formed bone, and the area of degradation of the biomaterials. Data were analyzed with multiple comparisons of means by Tukey contrasts, and significant difference was assigned at the level of P < 0.05. The proteins used for immunohistochemical analysis accounted for the process of formation, mineralization, and bone resorption and was performed using ordinal qualitative analysis, where from assigning scores. Conclusions Bone morphogenetic protein 2 was shown to be effective as an inducer of bone formation process independent biomaterial used mainly for accelerating the resorption process of the framework.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Surg & Integrated Clin, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Aracatuba, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Surg & Integrated Clin, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Aracatuba, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2008/10516-6SpringerUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP]Luvizuto, Eloa Rodrigues [UNESP]Sonoda, Celso Koogi [UNESP]Okamoto, Roberta [UNESP]Garcia-Junior, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]2018-11-26T17:31:23Z2018-11-26T17:31:23Z2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article247-258application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery-heidelberg. Heidelberg: Springer Heidelberg, v. 21, n. 2, p. 247-258, 2017.1865-1550http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16278610.1007/s10006-017-0624-3WOS:000401148800015WOS000401148800015.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOral And Maxillofacial Surgery-heidelberg0,471info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-19T13:30:01Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/162786Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-19T13:30:01Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats |
title |
Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats |
spellingShingle |
Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP] Bone regeneration Tissue scaffolds Dental implants Rats |
title_short |
Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats |
title_full |
Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats |
title_fullStr |
Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats |
title_full_unstemmed |
Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats |
title_sort |
Immunohistochemistry evaluation of BMP-2 with beta-tricalcium phosphate matrix, polylactic and polyglycolic acid gel, and calcium phosphate cement in rats |
author |
Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP] Luvizuto, Eloa Rodrigues [UNESP] Sonoda, Celso Koogi [UNESP] Okamoto, Roberta [UNESP] Garcia-Junior, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Luvizuto, Eloa Rodrigues [UNESP] Sonoda, Celso Koogi [UNESP] Okamoto, Roberta [UNESP] Garcia-Junior, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva de Oliveira, Julio Cesar da [UNESP] Luvizuto, Eloa Rodrigues [UNESP] Sonoda, Celso Koogi [UNESP] Okamoto, Roberta [UNESP] Garcia-Junior, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bone regeneration Tissue scaffolds Dental implants Rats |
topic |
Bone regeneration Tissue scaffolds Dental implants Rats |
description |
Purpose The installation of implants has become a routine procedure in the clinic. However, it takes time and adequate bone thickness, and for that, tissue engineering has made efforts to develop substitutes for autografts, in view of certain disadvantages of this material. The decision to choose the most suitable graft material for each case is an important step in the success of bone reconstruction. This study was to verify, by means of immunohistochemical study, that the addition of bone morphogenetic protein had some influence on biomaterials commercially available, taking into account the formation of mineralized tissue, bone replacement, and the amount of degradation of biomaterials. Methods The sample consisted of 72 rats that were divided into eight treatment groups, in which two defects of 5 mm were made in each animal calvaria. Euthanasia was performed at 5, 15, and 30 days postop. Results A histologic and histometric analysis was performed to quantitate the area of mineralized tissue formed, the area of newly formed bone, and the area of degradation of the biomaterials. Data were analyzed with multiple comparisons of means by Tukey contrasts, and significant difference was assigned at the level of P < 0.05. The proteins used for immunohistochemical analysis accounted for the process of formation, mineralization, and bone resorption and was performed using ordinal qualitative analysis, where from assigning scores. Conclusions Bone morphogenetic protein 2 was shown to be effective as an inducer of bone formation process independent biomaterial used mainly for accelerating the resorption process of the framework. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-01 2018-11-26T17:31:23Z 2018-11-26T17:31:23Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3 Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery-heidelberg. Heidelberg: Springer Heidelberg, v. 21, n. 2, p. 247-258, 2017. 1865-1550 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162786 10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3 WOS:000401148800015 WOS000401148800015.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/162786 |
identifier_str_mv |
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery-heidelberg. Heidelberg: Springer Heidelberg, v. 21, n. 2, p. 247-258, 2017. 1865-1550 10.1007/s10006-017-0624-3 WOS:000401148800015 WOS000401148800015.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery-heidelberg 0,471 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
247-258 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546387602669568 |