Production of lettuce and flower alelí of cutting in monoculture and intercrooping under organic fertilization conditions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Milicia, Víctor José
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: López, Cristian Javier, Pezzi, Javier Ítalo, Montiel, Karina Alejandra, Rodríguez, María Fabiana, Lovisolo, Marcelo Ramón
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
Texto Completo: https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/9418
Resumo: The objectives were to evaluate the effect of two types of fertilizers on the biological and economic yields of lettuce and on the quality of the stem in flower alelí and to establish the Equivalent Land relationship of monocultures and polycultures of lettuce and flower alelí for cut flowers, respectively. For this, a factorial experiment was carried out with two factors: system with three plantation levels: monoculture of lettuce, monoculture of flower alelí and polyculture of both species and type of fertilizer with three levels: composted chicken litter, granulated chemical fertilizer and control. The evaluated variables did not show interaction between the plantation systems and the type of fertilizer. In lettuce with composted chicken manure, the economic yield was 5.70 kg.m-2 and the biological yield was 0.218 kg.m-2, significantly higher than the treatments with inorganic fertilizer (4.55 kg.m-2 - 0.206 kg.m-2) and the control (2.94 kg.m-2 - 0.164 kg.m-2). Similar results found in the crops association. In flower alelí, the incorporation of chicken manure to the soil allowed to obtain floral stems 30.8% and 20.4% longer than the control and the chemical fertilizer, respectively. In all the cases, the total land equivalent ratio -RETT- was greater than 1, which indicates an advantage of polyculture in relation to monoculture. The inorganic fertilization had a RETT of 1.21, higher than the rest of the treatments.
id GVAA-1_69aed9597153cd14002394a2916d6876
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.gvaa.com.br:article/9418
network_acronym_str GVAA-1
network_name_str Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
repository_id_str
spelling Production of lettuce and flower alelí of cutting in monoculture and intercrooping under organic fertilization conditionsProducción de lechuga y alelí de corte en monocultivo y consociados bajo condiciones de fertilización orgánica Produção de alface e alelí de corte em monocultura e associadas em condições de fertilização orgânicaAgroecologíaPolicultivosNutrición vegetalAgroecologyPolyculturesPlant nutritionAgroecologiaPoliculturasNutrição vegetalThe objectives were to evaluate the effect of two types of fertilizers on the biological and economic yields of lettuce and on the quality of the stem in flower alelí and to establish the Equivalent Land relationship of monocultures and polycultures of lettuce and flower alelí for cut flowers, respectively. For this, a factorial experiment was carried out with two factors: system with three plantation levels: monoculture of lettuce, monoculture of flower alelí and polyculture of both species and type of fertilizer with three levels: composted chicken litter, granulated chemical fertilizer and control. The evaluated variables did not show interaction between the plantation systems and the type of fertilizer. In lettuce with composted chicken manure, the economic yield was 5.70 kg.m-2 and the biological yield was 0.218 kg.m-2, significantly higher than the treatments with inorganic fertilizer (4.55 kg.m-2 - 0.206 kg.m-2) and the control (2.94 kg.m-2 - 0.164 kg.m-2). Similar results found in the crops association. In flower alelí, the incorporation of chicken manure to the soil allowed to obtain floral stems 30.8% and 20.4% longer than the control and the chemical fertilizer, respectively. In all the cases, the total land equivalent ratio -RETT- was greater than 1, which indicates an advantage of polyculture in relation to monoculture. The inorganic fertilization had a RETT of 1.21, higher than the rest of the treatments.Los objetivos del trabajo fueron evaluar el efecto de dos tipos de fertilizante sobre los rendimientos biológicos y económicos de lechuga y sobre la calidad de vara en alelí y establecer la Relación Equivalente Tierra Total de los monocultivos y policultivos de lechuga y alelí para flor de corte, respectivamente. Para ello se realizó un diseño factorial con dos factores: Sistema con tres niveles de plantación: monocultivo de lechuga, monocultivo de alelí y policultivo de ambas especies y tipo de fertilizante con tres niveles: cama de pollo parrillero compostada, fertilizante químico granulado y testigo. Las variables evaluadas no mostraron interacción entre los sistemas de plantación y el tipo de fertilizante, por lo que el efecto de los factores sobre las variables pudieron ser evaluados independientemente. En lechuga con cama de pollo compostada el rendimiento económico fue de 5,70 kg.m-2 y el rendimiento biológico de 0,218 kg.m-2, significativamente mayores a los tratamientos con fertilizante inorgánico (4,55 kg.m-2 - 0,206 kg.m-2) y al testigo (2,94 kg.m-2 - 0,164 kg.m-2). Similares resultados se hallaron en la asociación de cultivos. En alelí, la incorporación al suelo de la cama de pollo permitió obtener varas florales 30,8% y 20,4% más largas que el testigo y que el fertilizante químico respectivamente. En todos los casos la relación Equivalente Tierra Total -RETT- fue mayor a 1, que indica una ventaja del policultivo con relación al monocultivo. La fertilización inorgánica tuvo una RETT de 1.21, superior al resto de los tratamientos.Os objetivos do trabalho foram avaliar o efeito de dois tipos de fertilizantes sobre os rendimentos biológicos e econômicos da alface e sobre a qualidade do caule em flores de estoque e estabelecer a relação Equivalente de Terra de monoculturas e policulturas de alface e flores de parede para flores de corte, respectivamente. Para isso, foi realizado um experimento fatorial com dois fatores: Sistema com três níveis de plantio: monocultura de alface, 2-monocultura de estoque e policicultura de ambas as espécies e tipo de fertilizante com três níveis: cama de frango compostada, fertilizante químico granulado e controle. As variáveis avaliadas não mostraram interação entre os sistemas de plantio e o tipo de fertilizante. Na alface com cama de frango compostada, o rendimento econômico foi de 5,70 kg.m-2 e o rendimento biológico foi de 0,218 kg.m-2, significativamente superior aos tratamentos com adubo inorgânico (4,55 kg.m-2 - 0,206 kg.m -2) e o controle (2,94 kg.m-2 - 0,164 kg.m-2). Resultados semelhantes foram encontrados na associação de culturas. Em estoque, a incorporação da cama de frango ao solo permitiu a obtenção de hastes florais 30,8% e 20,4% mais longas que a testemunha e o fertilizante químico, respectivamente. Em todos os casos, a razão equivalente de terra total -RETT- foi superior a 1, o que indica uma vantagem da policultura em relação à monocultura. A adubação inorgânica teve um RETT de 1,21, superior aos demais tratamentos.Editora Verde2023-02-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/941810.18378/rvads.v18i1.9418Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2023); 01-08Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2023); 01-08Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; v. 18 n. 1 (2023); 01-081981-8203reponame:Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavelinstname:Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)instacron:GVAAspahttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/9418/11377Copyright (c) 2023 Víctor José Milicia, Cristian Javier López, Javier Ítalo Pezzi, Karina Alejandra Montiel, María Fabiana Rodríguez, Marcelo Ramón Lovisolohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMilicia, Víctor JoséLópez, Cristian JavierPezzi, Javier ÍtaloMontiel, Karina AlejandraRodríguez, María FabianaLovisolo, Marcelo Ramón2023-02-20T00:21:01Zoai:ojs.gvaa.com.br:article/9418Revistahttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/PUBhttps://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/oairvadsgvaa@gmail.com || patriciomaracaja@gmail.com || revistaverde1@gmail.com || suporte@antsoft.com.br1981-82031981-8203opendoar:2024-03-06T12:59:49.115319Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel - Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Production of lettuce and flower alelí of cutting in monoculture and intercrooping under organic fertilization conditions
Producción de lechuga y alelí de corte en monocultivo y consociados bajo condiciones de fertilización orgánica
Produção de alface e alelí de corte em monocultura e associadas em condições de fertilização orgânica
title Production of lettuce and flower alelí of cutting in monoculture and intercrooping under organic fertilization conditions
spellingShingle Production of lettuce and flower alelí of cutting in monoculture and intercrooping under organic fertilization conditions
Milicia, Víctor José
Agroecología
Policultivos
Nutrición vegetal
Agroecology
Polycultures
Plant nutrition
Agroecologia
Policulturas
Nutrição vegetal
title_short Production of lettuce and flower alelí of cutting in monoculture and intercrooping under organic fertilization conditions
title_full Production of lettuce and flower alelí of cutting in monoculture and intercrooping under organic fertilization conditions
title_fullStr Production of lettuce and flower alelí of cutting in monoculture and intercrooping under organic fertilization conditions
title_full_unstemmed Production of lettuce and flower alelí of cutting in monoculture and intercrooping under organic fertilization conditions
title_sort Production of lettuce and flower alelí of cutting in monoculture and intercrooping under organic fertilization conditions
author Milicia, Víctor José
author_facet Milicia, Víctor José
López, Cristian Javier
Pezzi, Javier Ítalo
Montiel, Karina Alejandra
Rodríguez, María Fabiana
Lovisolo, Marcelo Ramón
author_role author
author2 López, Cristian Javier
Pezzi, Javier Ítalo
Montiel, Karina Alejandra
Rodríguez, María Fabiana
Lovisolo, Marcelo Ramón
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Milicia, Víctor José
López, Cristian Javier
Pezzi, Javier Ítalo
Montiel, Karina Alejandra
Rodríguez, María Fabiana
Lovisolo, Marcelo Ramón
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agroecología
Policultivos
Nutrición vegetal
Agroecology
Polycultures
Plant nutrition
Agroecologia
Policulturas
Nutrição vegetal
topic Agroecología
Policultivos
Nutrición vegetal
Agroecology
Polycultures
Plant nutrition
Agroecologia
Policulturas
Nutrição vegetal
description The objectives were to evaluate the effect of two types of fertilizers on the biological and economic yields of lettuce and on the quality of the stem in flower alelí and to establish the Equivalent Land relationship of monocultures and polycultures of lettuce and flower alelí for cut flowers, respectively. For this, a factorial experiment was carried out with two factors: system with three plantation levels: monoculture of lettuce, monoculture of flower alelí and polyculture of both species and type of fertilizer with three levels: composted chicken litter, granulated chemical fertilizer and control. The evaluated variables did not show interaction between the plantation systems and the type of fertilizer. In lettuce with composted chicken manure, the economic yield was 5.70 kg.m-2 and the biological yield was 0.218 kg.m-2, significantly higher than the treatments with inorganic fertilizer (4.55 kg.m-2 - 0.206 kg.m-2) and the control (2.94 kg.m-2 - 0.164 kg.m-2). Similar results found in the crops association. In flower alelí, the incorporation of chicken manure to the soil allowed to obtain floral stems 30.8% and 20.4% longer than the control and the chemical fertilizer, respectively. In all the cases, the total land equivalent ratio -RETT- was greater than 1, which indicates an advantage of polyculture in relation to monoculture. The inorganic fertilization had a RETT of 1.21, higher than the rest of the treatments.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/9418
10.18378/rvads.v18i1.9418
url https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/9418
identifier_str_mv 10.18378/rvads.v18i1.9418
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/9418/11377
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Verde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Verde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2023); 01-08
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2023); 01-08
Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável; v. 18 n. 1 (2023); 01-08
1981-8203
reponame:Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
instname:Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)
instacron:GVAA
instname_str Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)
instacron_str GVAA
institution GVAA
reponame_str Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
collection Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentavel - Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rvadsgvaa@gmail.com || patriciomaracaja@gmail.com || revistaverde1@gmail.com || suporte@antsoft.com.br
_version_ 1798948093256794112

Registros relacionados