Multi-trait genomic selection indexes applied to identification of superior genotypes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Lidiane Aparecida
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Peixoto,Marco Antônio, Peixoto,Leonardo de Azevedo, Romero,Juan Vicente, Bhering,Leonardo Lopes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bragantia
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052021000100234
Resumo: ABSTRACT Most studies on genomic selection in plant breeding compare different statistical methods of univariate approach. However, multi-trait methodologies should be considered since they allow the simultaneous selection of superior genotypes in several economic traits. Here, the aims were to compare the selection accuracy and efficiency of the multivariate partial least square (MPLS) method compared with random regression best linear unbiased predictor (rrBLUP), Bayesian Lasso (Blasso) and univariate partial least square (UPLS) and to develop genomic selection indexes efficient for superior genotypes identification in plant breeding. Ten F2 populations with 800 individuals were simulated, considering four traits with different heritabilities. Genomic selection analyses using rrBLUP, Blasso, UPLS, and MPLS were conducted. Four genomic selection indexes were elaborated by the sum of the marker effects obtained for each trait, weighted by the respective residual variance. Multi-trait indexes were developed based on the assumptions of each methodology mentioned (rrBLUP, Blasso, UPLS, and MPLS), and were denominated I-rrBLUP, I-Blasso, I-UPLS, and I-MPLS. Processing time, selective accuracy, selection gains, and selection coincidence were used to compare the methods and the selection indexes proposed. The MPLS method had similar results compared to UPLS method for the low heritability traits and was less efficient than the rrBLUP and Blasso. The genome selection indexes provided the highest total genetic gains. The I-rrBLUP and I-MPLS indexes stood out for high efficiency in selecting superior genotypes in the shortest processing time. Results suggest that the genomic selection indexes proposed in this study may be promising for plant breeding programs.
id IAC-1_3e1507892e3857139d7d11b6ec5df120
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0006-87052021000100234
network_acronym_str IAC-1
network_name_str Bragantia
repository_id_str
spelling Multi-trait genomic selection indexes applied to identification of superior genotypesquantitative geneticsbiometrymulti-trait analysisgenomic selectionlower heritabilityphenotypic selectionABSTRACT Most studies on genomic selection in plant breeding compare different statistical methods of univariate approach. However, multi-trait methodologies should be considered since they allow the simultaneous selection of superior genotypes in several economic traits. Here, the aims were to compare the selection accuracy and efficiency of the multivariate partial least square (MPLS) method compared with random regression best linear unbiased predictor (rrBLUP), Bayesian Lasso (Blasso) and univariate partial least square (UPLS) and to develop genomic selection indexes efficient for superior genotypes identification in plant breeding. Ten F2 populations with 800 individuals were simulated, considering four traits with different heritabilities. Genomic selection analyses using rrBLUP, Blasso, UPLS, and MPLS were conducted. Four genomic selection indexes were elaborated by the sum of the marker effects obtained for each trait, weighted by the respective residual variance. Multi-trait indexes were developed based on the assumptions of each methodology mentioned (rrBLUP, Blasso, UPLS, and MPLS), and were denominated I-rrBLUP, I-Blasso, I-UPLS, and I-MPLS. Processing time, selective accuracy, selection gains, and selection coincidence were used to compare the methods and the selection indexes proposed. The MPLS method had similar results compared to UPLS method for the low heritability traits and was less efficient than the rrBLUP and Blasso. The genome selection indexes provided the highest total genetic gains. The I-rrBLUP and I-MPLS indexes stood out for high efficiency in selecting superior genotypes in the shortest processing time. Results suggest that the genomic selection indexes proposed in this study may be promising for plant breeding programs.Instituto Agronômico de Campinas2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052021000100234Bragantia v.80 2021reponame:Bragantiainstname:Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)instacron:IAC10.1590/1678-4499.20200381info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Lidiane AparecidaPeixoto,Marco AntônioPeixoto,Leonardo de AzevedoRomero,Juan VicenteBhering,Leonardo Lopeseng2021-06-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0006-87052021000100234Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/brag/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbragantia@iac.sp.gov.br||bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br1678-44990006-8705opendoar:2021-06-01T00:00Bragantia - Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multi-trait genomic selection indexes applied to identification of superior genotypes
title Multi-trait genomic selection indexes applied to identification of superior genotypes
spellingShingle Multi-trait genomic selection indexes applied to identification of superior genotypes
Silva,Lidiane Aparecida
quantitative genetics
biometry
multi-trait analysis
genomic selection
lower heritability
phenotypic selection
title_short Multi-trait genomic selection indexes applied to identification of superior genotypes
title_full Multi-trait genomic selection indexes applied to identification of superior genotypes
title_fullStr Multi-trait genomic selection indexes applied to identification of superior genotypes
title_full_unstemmed Multi-trait genomic selection indexes applied to identification of superior genotypes
title_sort Multi-trait genomic selection indexes applied to identification of superior genotypes
author Silva,Lidiane Aparecida
author_facet Silva,Lidiane Aparecida
Peixoto,Marco Antônio
Peixoto,Leonardo de Azevedo
Romero,Juan Vicente
Bhering,Leonardo Lopes
author_role author
author2 Peixoto,Marco Antônio
Peixoto,Leonardo de Azevedo
Romero,Juan Vicente
Bhering,Leonardo Lopes
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Lidiane Aparecida
Peixoto,Marco Antônio
Peixoto,Leonardo de Azevedo
Romero,Juan Vicente
Bhering,Leonardo Lopes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv quantitative genetics
biometry
multi-trait analysis
genomic selection
lower heritability
phenotypic selection
topic quantitative genetics
biometry
multi-trait analysis
genomic selection
lower heritability
phenotypic selection
description ABSTRACT Most studies on genomic selection in plant breeding compare different statistical methods of univariate approach. However, multi-trait methodologies should be considered since they allow the simultaneous selection of superior genotypes in several economic traits. Here, the aims were to compare the selection accuracy and efficiency of the multivariate partial least square (MPLS) method compared with random regression best linear unbiased predictor (rrBLUP), Bayesian Lasso (Blasso) and univariate partial least square (UPLS) and to develop genomic selection indexes efficient for superior genotypes identification in plant breeding. Ten F2 populations with 800 individuals were simulated, considering four traits with different heritabilities. Genomic selection analyses using rrBLUP, Blasso, UPLS, and MPLS were conducted. Four genomic selection indexes were elaborated by the sum of the marker effects obtained for each trait, weighted by the respective residual variance. Multi-trait indexes were developed based on the assumptions of each methodology mentioned (rrBLUP, Blasso, UPLS, and MPLS), and were denominated I-rrBLUP, I-Blasso, I-UPLS, and I-MPLS. Processing time, selective accuracy, selection gains, and selection coincidence were used to compare the methods and the selection indexes proposed. The MPLS method had similar results compared to UPLS method for the low heritability traits and was less efficient than the rrBLUP and Blasso. The genome selection indexes provided the highest total genetic gains. The I-rrBLUP and I-MPLS indexes stood out for high efficiency in selecting superior genotypes in the shortest processing time. Results suggest that the genomic selection indexes proposed in this study may be promising for plant breeding programs.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052021000100234
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052021000100234
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-4499.20200381
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Agronômico de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bragantia v.80 2021
reponame:Bragantia
instname:Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
instacron:IAC
instname_str Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
instacron_str IAC
institution IAC
reponame_str Bragantia
collection Bragantia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bragantia - Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br||bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br
_version_ 1754193308087746560