Combined index of genomic prediction methods applied to productivity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000600404 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Rice cultivation has great national and global importance, being one of the most produced and consumed cereals in the world and the primary food for more than half of the world’s population. Because of its importance as food, developing efficient methods to select and predict genetically superior individuals in reference to plant traits is of extreme importance for breeding programs. The objective of this research was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of the Delta-p, G-BLUP (Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor), BayesCpi, BLASSO (Bayesian Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator), Delta-p/G-BLUP index, Delta-p/BayesCpi index, and Delta-p/BLASSO index in the estimation of genomic values and the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms on phenotypic data associated with rice traits. Use of molecular markers allowed high selective efficiency and increased genetic gain per unit time. The Delta-p method uses the concept of change in allelic frequency caused by selection and the theoretical concept of genetic gain. The Index is based on the principle of combined selection, using the information regarding the additive genomic values predicted via G-BLUP, BayesCpi, BLASSO, or Delta-p. These methods were applied and compared for genomic prediction using nine rice traits: flag leaf length, flag leaf width, panicles number per plant, primary panicle branch number, seed length, seed width, amylose content, protein content, and blast resistance. Delta-p/G-BLUP index had higher predictive abilities for the traits studied, except for amylose content trait in which the method with the highest predictive ability was BayesCpi, being approximately 3% greater than that of the Delta-p/G-BLUP index. |
id |
UFSM-2_af8e24b461b1fee4d1ea6ca02f632891 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782019000600404 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Combined index of genomic prediction methods applied to productivitygenomic predictionselection indexgenetic gainABSTRACT: Rice cultivation has great national and global importance, being one of the most produced and consumed cereals in the world and the primary food for more than half of the world’s population. Because of its importance as food, developing efficient methods to select and predict genetically superior individuals in reference to plant traits is of extreme importance for breeding programs. The objective of this research was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of the Delta-p, G-BLUP (Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor), BayesCpi, BLASSO (Bayesian Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator), Delta-p/G-BLUP index, Delta-p/BayesCpi index, and Delta-p/BLASSO index in the estimation of genomic values and the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms on phenotypic data associated with rice traits. Use of molecular markers allowed high selective efficiency and increased genetic gain per unit time. The Delta-p method uses the concept of change in allelic frequency caused by selection and the theoretical concept of genetic gain. The Index is based on the principle of combined selection, using the information regarding the additive genomic values predicted via G-BLUP, BayesCpi, BLASSO, or Delta-p. These methods were applied and compared for genomic prediction using nine rice traits: flag leaf length, flag leaf width, panicles number per plant, primary panicle branch number, seed length, seed width, amylose content, protein content, and blast resistance. Delta-p/G-BLUP index had higher predictive abilities for the traits studied, except for amylose content trait in which the method with the highest predictive ability was BayesCpi, being approximately 3% greater than that of the Delta-p/G-BLUP index.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000600404Ciência Rural v.49 n.6 2019reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20181008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSuela,Matheus MassariolLima,Leísa PiresAzevedo,Camila FerreiraResende,Marcos Deon Vilela deNascimento,MoysésSilva,Fabyano Fonseca eeng2019-06-24T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Combined index of genomic prediction methods applied to productivity |
title |
Combined index of genomic prediction methods applied to productivity |
spellingShingle |
Combined index of genomic prediction methods applied to productivity Suela,Matheus Massariol genomic prediction selection index genetic gain |
title_short |
Combined index of genomic prediction methods applied to productivity |
title_full |
Combined index of genomic prediction methods applied to productivity |
title_fullStr |
Combined index of genomic prediction methods applied to productivity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Combined index of genomic prediction methods applied to productivity |
title_sort |
Combined index of genomic prediction methods applied to productivity |
author |
Suela,Matheus Massariol |
author_facet |
Suela,Matheus Massariol Lima,Leísa Pires Azevedo,Camila Ferreira Resende,Marcos Deon Vilela de Nascimento,Moysés Silva,Fabyano Fonseca e |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima,Leísa Pires Azevedo,Camila Ferreira Resende,Marcos Deon Vilela de Nascimento,Moysés Silva,Fabyano Fonseca e |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Suela,Matheus Massariol Lima,Leísa Pires Azevedo,Camila Ferreira Resende,Marcos Deon Vilela de Nascimento,Moysés Silva,Fabyano Fonseca e |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
genomic prediction selection index genetic gain |
topic |
genomic prediction selection index genetic gain |
description |
ABSTRACT: Rice cultivation has great national and global importance, being one of the most produced and consumed cereals in the world and the primary food for more than half of the world’s population. Because of its importance as food, developing efficient methods to select and predict genetically superior individuals in reference to plant traits is of extreme importance for breeding programs. The objective of this research was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of the Delta-p, G-BLUP (Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor), BayesCpi, BLASSO (Bayesian Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator), Delta-p/G-BLUP index, Delta-p/BayesCpi index, and Delta-p/BLASSO index in the estimation of genomic values and the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms on phenotypic data associated with rice traits. Use of molecular markers allowed high selective efficiency and increased genetic gain per unit time. The Delta-p method uses the concept of change in allelic frequency caused by selection and the theoretical concept of genetic gain. The Index is based on the principle of combined selection, using the information regarding the additive genomic values predicted via G-BLUP, BayesCpi, BLASSO, or Delta-p. These methods were applied and compared for genomic prediction using nine rice traits: flag leaf length, flag leaf width, panicles number per plant, primary panicle branch number, seed length, seed width, amylose content, protein content, and blast resistance. Delta-p/G-BLUP index had higher predictive abilities for the traits studied, except for amylose content trait in which the method with the highest predictive ability was BayesCpi, being approximately 3% greater than that of the Delta-p/G-BLUP index. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000600404 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000600404 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20181008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.49 n.6 2019 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140553862217728 |