Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade, Dias, Célia da Consolação, Miranda, Angélica Conceição Dias
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366
Resumo: Introduction: Composed by several movements, Open Science has been gaining considerable notoriety in the search for increasing confidence in the research results, seeking transparency in all the elements that make up a scientific investigation process. Objective: In this scenario, this article aims to analyze the importance attributed by actors involved with Open Science and its movements and initiatives. Method: A questionnaire was sent to personalities involved in the scientific process: two groups of messaging and communication applications in audio and video over the internet and a discussion list of actors interested in the topic, composed of librarians, researchers, professors and editors. Structured by 1 open question and 20 variables related to Open Science, the respondents were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale the importance of each one, observing the context of scientific communication developed at the public university. Results: With the assistance of SPSS, descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and mean were performed. In addition, a factor analysis was applied and the possibility of condensing the information into a total of four components was identified. Conclusion: Through this study, it was concluded that, in spite of alternating the frequency, the most important mode was registered for all variables, indicating that all the initiatives and movements listed in the study were considered important by the actors involved with Open Science.
id IBDCivil_bc9135c8037f0aebec98215088b29907
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670366
network_acronym_str IBDCivil
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholdersImportância das práticas de Ciência Aberta e de comunicação científica na perspectiva de atores envolvidosCiência AbertaComunicação científicaMétodos matemáticos e estatísticosAnálise fatorialCiência da InformaçãoOpen ScienceScienctific communicationMathematical methodsStatistical methodsFactor analysisInformation ScienceIntroduction: Composed by several movements, Open Science has been gaining considerable notoriety in the search for increasing confidence in the research results, seeking transparency in all the elements that make up a scientific investigation process. Objective: In this scenario, this article aims to analyze the importance attributed by actors involved with Open Science and its movements and initiatives. Method: A questionnaire was sent to personalities involved in the scientific process: two groups of messaging and communication applications in audio and video over the internet and a discussion list of actors interested in the topic, composed of librarians, researchers, professors and editors. Structured by 1 open question and 20 variables related to Open Science, the respondents were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale the importance of each one, observing the context of scientific communication developed at the public university. Results: With the assistance of SPSS, descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and mean were performed. In addition, a factor analysis was applied and the possibility of condensing the information into a total of four components was identified. Conclusion: Through this study, it was concluded that, in spite of alternating the frequency, the most important mode was registered for all variables, indicating that all the initiatives and movements listed in the study were considered important by the actors involved with Open Science.Introdução: Composta por vários movimentos, a Ciência Aberta vem ganhando expressividade considerável na busca pela ampliação da confiança nos resultados de pesquisa, buscando a transparência em todos os elementos que compõem um processo de investigação científica. Objetivo: Nesse cenário, objetivou-se com este artigo analisar a importância atribuída por atores envolvidos com a Ciência Aberta, seus movimentos e iniciativas. Metodologia: Um questionário foi enviado a personalidades envolvidas com o processo científico por meio de dois grupos de aplicativos de troca de mensagens e comunicação em áudio e vídeo pela internet e uma lista de discussão de atores interessados na temática, composta por bibliotecários, pesquisadores, professores e editores. Estruturado por uma questão aberta e 20 variáveis relacionadas à Ciência Aberta, os respondentes foram orientados a indicar, em uma escala Likert de cinco pontos, a importância de cada uma delas, observando o contexto da comunicação científica desenvolvido na universidade pública. Resultados: Com o auxílio do software SPSS, foram realizadas análises estatísticas descritivas de frequência e média. Ainda, aplicou-se a análise fatorial e identificou-se a possibilidade de condensar as informações em um total de quatro componentes ou agrupamentos. Conclusão: Por meio deste estudo, concluiu-se que, apesar de alternar a frequência, todas as variáveis apresentaram como moda o fator cinco, indicando que todas as iniciativas e movimentos elencados no estudo foram considerados muito importantes pelos atores envolvidos com a Ciência Aberta.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2022-08-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/867036610.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670366RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 20 (2022): Countinous Publication; e022019RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 20 (2022): Publicação Contínua; e0220191678-765Xreponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)instacron:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civilporenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29815https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29816https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29817https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29818https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29819https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29820World; ContemporaryMundial; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2022 Nivaldo Calixto Ribeiro, Dalgiza Andrade Oliveira, Célia da Consolação Dias, Angélica Conceição Dias Mirandahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Nivaldo CalixtoOliveira, Dalgiza Andrade Dias, Célia da Consolação Miranda, Angélica Conceição Dias 2023-12-29T18:07:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670366Revistahttps://rbdcivil.ibdcivil.org.br/rbdchttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/oai||rbdcivil@ibdcivil.org.br2358-69742358-6974opendoar:2023-12-29T18:07:41Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
Importância das práticas de Ciência Aberta e de comunicação científica na perspectiva de atores envolvidos
title Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
spellingShingle Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
Ciência Aberta
Comunicação científica
Métodos matemáticos e estatísticos
Análise fatorial
Ciência da Informação
Open Science
Scienctific communication
Mathematical methods
Statistical methods
Factor analysis
Information Science
title_short Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
title_full Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
title_fullStr Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
title_sort Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
author Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
author_facet Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade
Dias, Célia da Consolação
Miranda, Angélica Conceição Dias
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade
Dias, Célia da Consolação
Miranda, Angélica Conceição Dias
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade
Dias, Célia da Consolação
Miranda, Angélica Conceição Dias
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ciência Aberta
Comunicação científica
Métodos matemáticos e estatísticos
Análise fatorial
Ciência da Informação
Open Science
Scienctific communication
Mathematical methods
Statistical methods
Factor analysis
Information Science
topic Ciência Aberta
Comunicação científica
Métodos matemáticos e estatísticos
Análise fatorial
Ciência da Informação
Open Science
Scienctific communication
Mathematical methods
Statistical methods
Factor analysis
Information Science
description Introduction: Composed by several movements, Open Science has been gaining considerable notoriety in the search for increasing confidence in the research results, seeking transparency in all the elements that make up a scientific investigation process. Objective: In this scenario, this article aims to analyze the importance attributed by actors involved with Open Science and its movements and initiatives. Method: A questionnaire was sent to personalities involved in the scientific process: two groups of messaging and communication applications in audio and video over the internet and a discussion list of actors interested in the topic, composed of librarians, researchers, professors and editors. Structured by 1 open question and 20 variables related to Open Science, the respondents were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale the importance of each one, observing the context of scientific communication developed at the public university. Results: With the assistance of SPSS, descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and mean were performed. In addition, a factor analysis was applied and the possibility of condensing the information into a total of four components was identified. Conclusion: Through this study, it was concluded that, in spite of alternating the frequency, the most important mode was registered for all variables, indicating that all the initiatives and movements listed in the study were considered important by the actors involved with Open Science.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366
10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670366
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670366
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29815
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29816
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29817
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29818
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29819
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29820
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
text/html
text/html
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv World; Contemporary
Mundial; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 20 (2022): Countinous Publication; e022019
RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 20 (2022): Publicação Contínua; e022019
1678-765X
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)
instacron:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)
instacron_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil
institution Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbdcivil@ibdcivil.org.br
_version_ 1814256962905309184