Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Composed by several movements, Open Science has been gaining considerable notoriety in the search for increasing confidence in the research results, seeking transparency in all the elements that make up a scientific investigation process. Objective: In this scenario, this article aims to analyze the importance attributed by actors involved with Open Science and its movements and initiatives. Method: A questionnaire was sent to personalities involved in the scientific process: two groups of messaging and communication applications in audio and video over the internet and a discussion list of actors interested in the topic, composed of librarians, researchers, professors and editors. Structured by 1 open question and 20 variables related to Open Science, the respondents were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale the importance of each one, observing the context of scientific communication developed at the public university. Results: With the assistance of SPSS, descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and mean were performed. In addition, a factor analysis was applied and the possibility of condensing the information into a total of four components was identified. Conclusion: Through this study, it was concluded that, in spite of alternating the frequency, the most important mode was registered for all variables, indicating that all the initiatives and movements listed in the study were considered important by the actors involved with Open Science. |
id |
IBDCivil_bc9135c8037f0aebec98215088b29907 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670366 |
network_acronym_str |
IBDCivil |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholdersImportância das práticas de Ciência Aberta e de comunicação científica na perspectiva de atores envolvidosCiência AbertaComunicação científicaMétodos matemáticos e estatísticosAnálise fatorialCiência da InformaçãoOpen ScienceScienctific communicationMathematical methodsStatistical methodsFactor analysisInformation ScienceIntroduction: Composed by several movements, Open Science has been gaining considerable notoriety in the search for increasing confidence in the research results, seeking transparency in all the elements that make up a scientific investigation process. Objective: In this scenario, this article aims to analyze the importance attributed by actors involved with Open Science and its movements and initiatives. Method: A questionnaire was sent to personalities involved in the scientific process: two groups of messaging and communication applications in audio and video over the internet and a discussion list of actors interested in the topic, composed of librarians, researchers, professors and editors. Structured by 1 open question and 20 variables related to Open Science, the respondents were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale the importance of each one, observing the context of scientific communication developed at the public university. Results: With the assistance of SPSS, descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and mean were performed. In addition, a factor analysis was applied and the possibility of condensing the information into a total of four components was identified. Conclusion: Through this study, it was concluded that, in spite of alternating the frequency, the most important mode was registered for all variables, indicating that all the initiatives and movements listed in the study were considered important by the actors involved with Open Science.Introdução: Composta por vários movimentos, a Ciência Aberta vem ganhando expressividade considerável na busca pela ampliação da confiança nos resultados de pesquisa, buscando a transparência em todos os elementos que compõem um processo de investigação científica. Objetivo: Nesse cenário, objetivou-se com este artigo analisar a importância atribuída por atores envolvidos com a Ciência Aberta, seus movimentos e iniciativas. Metodologia: Um questionário foi enviado a personalidades envolvidas com o processo científico por meio de dois grupos de aplicativos de troca de mensagens e comunicação em áudio e vídeo pela internet e uma lista de discussão de atores interessados na temática, composta por bibliotecários, pesquisadores, professores e editores. Estruturado por uma questão aberta e 20 variáveis relacionadas à Ciência Aberta, os respondentes foram orientados a indicar, em uma escala Likert de cinco pontos, a importância de cada uma delas, observando o contexto da comunicação científica desenvolvido na universidade pública. Resultados: Com o auxílio do software SPSS, foram realizadas análises estatísticas descritivas de frequência e média. Ainda, aplicou-se a análise fatorial e identificou-se a possibilidade de condensar as informações em um total de quatro componentes ou agrupamentos. Conclusão: Por meio deste estudo, concluiu-se que, apesar de alternar a frequência, todas as variáveis apresentaram como moda o fator cinco, indicando que todas as iniciativas e movimentos elencados no estudo foram considerados muito importantes pelos atores envolvidos com a Ciência Aberta.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2022-08-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/867036610.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670366RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 20 (2022): Countinous Publication; e022019RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 20 (2022): Publicação Contínua; e0220191678-765Xreponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)instacron:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civilporenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29815https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29816https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29817https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29818https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29819https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29820World; ContemporaryMundial; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2022 Nivaldo Calixto Ribeiro, Dalgiza Andrade Oliveira, Célia da Consolação Dias, Angélica Conceição Dias Mirandahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Nivaldo CalixtoOliveira, Dalgiza Andrade Dias, Célia da Consolação Miranda, Angélica Conceição Dias 2023-12-29T18:07:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670366Revistahttps://rbdcivil.ibdcivil.org.br/rbdchttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/oai||rbdcivil@ibdcivil.org.br2358-69742358-6974opendoar:2023-12-29T18:07:41Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders Importância das práticas de Ciência Aberta e de comunicação científica na perspectiva de atores envolvidos |
title |
Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders |
spellingShingle |
Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto Ciência Aberta Comunicação científica Métodos matemáticos e estatísticos Análise fatorial Ciência da Informação Open Science Scienctific communication Mathematical methods Statistical methods Factor analysis Information Science |
title_short |
Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders |
title_full |
Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders |
title_fullStr |
Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders |
title_full_unstemmed |
Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders |
title_sort |
Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders |
author |
Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade Dias, Célia da Consolação Miranda, Angélica Conceição Dias |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade Dias, Célia da Consolação Miranda, Angélica Conceição Dias |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade Dias, Célia da Consolação Miranda, Angélica Conceição Dias |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Aberta Comunicação científica Métodos matemáticos e estatísticos Análise fatorial Ciência da Informação Open Science Scienctific communication Mathematical methods Statistical methods Factor analysis Information Science |
topic |
Ciência Aberta Comunicação científica Métodos matemáticos e estatísticos Análise fatorial Ciência da Informação Open Science Scienctific communication Mathematical methods Statistical methods Factor analysis Information Science |
description |
Introduction: Composed by several movements, Open Science has been gaining considerable notoriety in the search for increasing confidence in the research results, seeking transparency in all the elements that make up a scientific investigation process. Objective: In this scenario, this article aims to analyze the importance attributed by actors involved with Open Science and its movements and initiatives. Method: A questionnaire was sent to personalities involved in the scientific process: two groups of messaging and communication applications in audio and video over the internet and a discussion list of actors interested in the topic, composed of librarians, researchers, professors and editors. Structured by 1 open question and 20 variables related to Open Science, the respondents were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale the importance of each one, observing the context of scientific communication developed at the public university. Results: With the assistance of SPSS, descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and mean were performed. In addition, a factor analysis was applied and the possibility of condensing the information into a total of four components was identified. Conclusion: Through this study, it was concluded that, in spite of alternating the frequency, the most important mode was registered for all variables, indicating that all the initiatives and movements listed in the study were considered important by the actors involved with Open Science. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366 10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670366 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670366 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29815 https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29816 https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29817 https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29818 https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29819 https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670366/29820 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf text/html text/html application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
World; Contemporary Mundial; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science; Vol. 20 (2022): Countinous Publication; e022019 RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação; v. 20 (2022): Publicação Contínua; e022019 1678-765X reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil) instacron:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil) |
instacron_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil |
institution |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Civil (IBDCivil) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbdcivil@ibdcivil.org.br |
_version_ |
1814256962905309184 |