Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Galli,Juliana Altafin
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Michelotto,Marcos Doniseti, Carrega,Willians Cesar, Fischer,Ivan Herman
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572019000100242
Resumo: ABSTRACT Fruit flies are the biggest obstacle in guava cultivation, with the monitoring of population a fundamental aspect for their management. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of attractive lures for fruit flies in guava trees, produced in an organic system. McPhail traps were installed with 400 mL of solution, in four repetitions, and distributed in randomized blocks in six treatments: Isca Mosca® (5%); Isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); Torula® yeast; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® and guava juice (50%), with 3 weekly reviews. Data on capture were subjected to analysis of variance, and averages were compared (Tukey 5%). The values of fly trap per day (FTD) were computed. The correlation between flies and meteorological variables were evaluated, as well as the monthly cost of lures. A total of 37,917 individuals from the genus Anastrepha and 122 species of flies Ceratitis capitata were collected, being Anastrepha spp. the main genus of fruit fly in the region. The Ceratrap product proved to be superior, followed by Torula, Isca Mosca, and Bio Anastrepha; Isca Samaritá and guava juice presented the lowest results. The standard trapping of females was like the total. The uniformity of attraction presented a drop in all treatments, and Ceratrap was more constant after seven days. The correlations between meteorological factors and population variation were positive and significant only for precipitation. The most expensive treatments (Ceratrap and Torula) were also the most efficient and selective, and the Ceratrap product required less manpower.
id IBIO-1_607af626bc1bac6f79e5ef28b07cdb3f
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-16572019000100242
network_acronym_str IBIO-1
network_name_str Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchardPsidium guajavaAnastrepha spp.population monitoringABSTRACT Fruit flies are the biggest obstacle in guava cultivation, with the monitoring of population a fundamental aspect for their management. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of attractive lures for fruit flies in guava trees, produced in an organic system. McPhail traps were installed with 400 mL of solution, in four repetitions, and distributed in randomized blocks in six treatments: Isca Mosca® (5%); Isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); Torula® yeast; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® and guava juice (50%), with 3 weekly reviews. Data on capture were subjected to analysis of variance, and averages were compared (Tukey 5%). The values of fly trap per day (FTD) were computed. The correlation between flies and meteorological variables were evaluated, as well as the monthly cost of lures. A total of 37,917 individuals from the genus Anastrepha and 122 species of flies Ceratitis capitata were collected, being Anastrepha spp. the main genus of fruit fly in the region. The Ceratrap product proved to be superior, followed by Torula, Isca Mosca, and Bio Anastrepha; Isca Samaritá and guava juice presented the lowest results. The standard trapping of females was like the total. The uniformity of attraction presented a drop in all treatments, and Ceratrap was more constant after seven days. The correlations between meteorological factors and population variation were positive and significant only for precipitation. The most expensive treatments (Ceratrap and Torula) were also the most efficient and selective, and the Ceratrap product required less manpower.Instituto Biológico2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572019000100242Arquivos do Instituto Biológico v.86 2019reponame:Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)instname:Instituto Biológico (IB)instacron:IBIO10.1590/1808-1657000682018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGalli,Juliana AltafinMichelotto,Marcos DonisetiCarrega,Willians CesarFischer,Ivan Hermaneng2019-11-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-16572019000100242Revistahttp://www.biologico.sp.gov.br/arquivos_bio.phphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@biologico.sp.gov.br1808-16570020-3653opendoar:2019-11-27T00:00Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) - Instituto Biológico (IB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
title Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
spellingShingle Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
Galli,Juliana Altafin
Psidium guajava
Anastrepha spp.
population monitoring
title_short Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
title_full Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
title_fullStr Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
title_full_unstemmed Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
title_sort Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
author Galli,Juliana Altafin
author_facet Galli,Juliana Altafin
Michelotto,Marcos Doniseti
Carrega,Willians Cesar
Fischer,Ivan Herman
author_role author
author2 Michelotto,Marcos Doniseti
Carrega,Willians Cesar
Fischer,Ivan Herman
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Galli,Juliana Altafin
Michelotto,Marcos Doniseti
Carrega,Willians Cesar
Fischer,Ivan Herman
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Psidium guajava
Anastrepha spp.
population monitoring
topic Psidium guajava
Anastrepha spp.
population monitoring
description ABSTRACT Fruit flies are the biggest obstacle in guava cultivation, with the monitoring of population a fundamental aspect for their management. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of attractive lures for fruit flies in guava trees, produced in an organic system. McPhail traps were installed with 400 mL of solution, in four repetitions, and distributed in randomized blocks in six treatments: Isca Mosca® (5%); Isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); Torula® yeast; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® and guava juice (50%), with 3 weekly reviews. Data on capture were subjected to analysis of variance, and averages were compared (Tukey 5%). The values of fly trap per day (FTD) were computed. The correlation between flies and meteorological variables were evaluated, as well as the monthly cost of lures. A total of 37,917 individuals from the genus Anastrepha and 122 species of flies Ceratitis capitata were collected, being Anastrepha spp. the main genus of fruit fly in the region. The Ceratrap product proved to be superior, followed by Torula, Isca Mosca, and Bio Anastrepha; Isca Samaritá and guava juice presented the lowest results. The standard trapping of females was like the total. The uniformity of attraction presented a drop in all treatments, and Ceratrap was more constant after seven days. The correlations between meteorological factors and population variation were positive and significant only for precipitation. The most expensive treatments (Ceratrap and Torula) were also the most efficient and selective, and the Ceratrap product required less manpower.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572019000100242
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572019000100242
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1808-1657000682018
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Biológico
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Biológico
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos do Instituto Biológico v.86 2019
reponame:Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
instname:Instituto Biológico (IB)
instacron:IBIO
instname_str Instituto Biológico (IB)
instacron_str IBIO
institution IBIO
reponame_str Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
collection Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) - Instituto Biológico (IB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||arquivos@biologico.sp.gov.br
_version_ 1754193670420037632