Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000682018 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212038 |
Resumo: | Fruit flies are the biggest obstacle in guava cultivation, with the monitoring of population a fundamental aspect for their management. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of attractive lures for fruit flies in guava trees, produced in an organic system. McPhail traps were installed with 400 mL of solution, in four repetitions, and distributed in randomized blocks in six treatments: Isca Mosca® (5%); Isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); Torula® yeast; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® and guava juice (50%), with 3 weekly reviews. Data on capture were subjected to analysis of variance, and averages were compared (Tukey 5%). The values of fly trap per day (FTD) were computed. The correlation between flies and meteorological variables were evaluated, as well as the monthly cost of lures. A total of 37,917 individuals from the genus Anastrepha and 122 species of flies Ceratitis capitata were collected, being Anastrepha spp. the main genus of fruit fly in the region. The Ceratrap product proved to be superior, followed by Torula, Isca Mosca, and Bio Anastrepha; Isca Samaritá and guava juice presented the lowest results. The standard trapping of females was like the total. The uniformity of attraction presented a drop in all treatments, and Ceratrap was more constant after seven days. The correlations between meteorological factors and population variation were positive and significant only for precipitation. The most expensive treatments (Ceratrap and Torula) were also the most efficient and selective, and the Ceratrap product required less manpower. |
id |
UNSP_8b4d831ccf703cc5f2883957ac898e07 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/212038 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchardIscas atrativas para a mosca-das-frutas em um pomar orgânico de goiabaPsidium guajavaAnastrepha spp.population monitoringPsidium guajavaAnastrepha spp.monitoramento populacionalFruit flies are the biggest obstacle in guava cultivation, with the monitoring of population a fundamental aspect for their management. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of attractive lures for fruit flies in guava trees, produced in an organic system. McPhail traps were installed with 400 mL of solution, in four repetitions, and distributed in randomized blocks in six treatments: Isca Mosca® (5%); Isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); Torula® yeast; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® and guava juice (50%), with 3 weekly reviews. Data on capture were subjected to analysis of variance, and averages were compared (Tukey 5%). The values of fly trap per day (FTD) were computed. The correlation between flies and meteorological variables were evaluated, as well as the monthly cost of lures. A total of 37,917 individuals from the genus Anastrepha and 122 species of flies Ceratitis capitata were collected, being Anastrepha spp. the main genus of fruit fly in the region. The Ceratrap product proved to be superior, followed by Torula, Isca Mosca, and Bio Anastrepha; Isca Samaritá and guava juice presented the lowest results. The standard trapping of females was like the total. The uniformity of attraction presented a drop in all treatments, and Ceratrap was more constant after seven days. The correlations between meteorological factors and population variation were positive and significant only for precipitation. The most expensive treatments (Ceratrap and Torula) were also the most efficient and selective, and the Ceratrap product required less manpower.A presença de mosca-das-frutas é o maior obstáculo à produção de goiabas, sendo o monitoramento populacional de fundamental importância para seu manejo. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a eficácia de iscas atrativas para mosca-das-frutas em goiabeiras, produzidas em um sistema orgânico. Foram instaladas armadilhas McPhail contendo 400 mL de solução, em quatro repetições e distribuição em blocos randomizados, em seis tratamentos: isca Mosca® (5%); isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); levedura Torula®; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® e suco de goiaba (50%), com 3 avaliações semanais. Os dados da captura foram submetidos à análise de variância e às médias comparadas (Tukey 5%). Os valores de Mosca por Armadilha por Dia (MAD) foram calculados. A correlação entre moscas e as variáveis meteorológicas foi avaliada e o custo mensal das iscas foi calculado. Foram coletados 37.917 indivíduos do gênero Anastrepha e 122 moscas da espécie Ceratitis capitata, sendo a Anastrepha spp. o principal gênero de mosca-das-frutas da região. O produto Ceratrap mostrou-se superior, seguido pelas iscas Torula, Isca Mosca e Bio Anastrepha; a Isca Samaritá e o suco de goiaba apresentaram os menores resultados de captura. O padrão de captura de fêmeas foi semelhante ao total. Verificou-se uma queda na uniformidade de atração de todos os tratamentos, sendo o Ceratrap o que apresentou maior constância após sete dias. As correlações entre os fatores meteorológicos e a flutuação populacional foram positivas e significativas apenas para a precipitação. Os tratamentos mais onerosos (Ceratrap e Torula) também foram os mais eficientes e seletivos, sendo o produto Ceratrap o que demandou menor mão de obra.Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos AgronegóciosUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e VeterináriasUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e VeterináriasInstituto BiológicoAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos AgronegóciosUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Galli, Juliana AltafinMichelotto, Marcos DonisetiCarrega, Willians Cesar [UNESP]Fischer, Ivan Herman2021-07-14T10:33:33Z2021-07-14T10:33:33Z2019-12-2info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000682018Arquivos do Instituto Biológico. Instituto Biológico, v. 86, p. -, 2019.0020-36531808-1657http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21203810.1590/1808-1657000682018S1808-16572019000100242S1808-16572019000100242.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengArquivos do Instituto Biológicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-02T06:10:50Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/212038Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:16:27.873747Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard Iscas atrativas para a mosca-das-frutas em um pomar orgânico de goiaba |
title |
Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard |
spellingShingle |
Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard Galli, Juliana Altafin Psidium guajava Anastrepha spp. population monitoring Psidium guajava Anastrepha spp. monitoramento populacional |
title_short |
Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard |
title_full |
Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard |
title_fullStr |
Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard |
title_full_unstemmed |
Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard |
title_sort |
Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard |
author |
Galli, Juliana Altafin |
author_facet |
Galli, Juliana Altafin Michelotto, Marcos Doniseti Carrega, Willians Cesar [UNESP] Fischer, Ivan Herman |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Michelotto, Marcos Doniseti Carrega, Willians Cesar [UNESP] Fischer, Ivan Herman |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Galli, Juliana Altafin Michelotto, Marcos Doniseti Carrega, Willians Cesar [UNESP] Fischer, Ivan Herman |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Psidium guajava Anastrepha spp. population monitoring Psidium guajava Anastrepha spp. monitoramento populacional |
topic |
Psidium guajava Anastrepha spp. population monitoring Psidium guajava Anastrepha spp. monitoramento populacional |
description |
Fruit flies are the biggest obstacle in guava cultivation, with the monitoring of population a fundamental aspect for their management. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of attractive lures for fruit flies in guava trees, produced in an organic system. McPhail traps were installed with 400 mL of solution, in four repetitions, and distributed in randomized blocks in six treatments: Isca Mosca® (5%); Isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); Torula® yeast; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® and guava juice (50%), with 3 weekly reviews. Data on capture were subjected to analysis of variance, and averages were compared (Tukey 5%). The values of fly trap per day (FTD) were computed. The correlation between flies and meteorological variables were evaluated, as well as the monthly cost of lures. A total of 37,917 individuals from the genus Anastrepha and 122 species of flies Ceratitis capitata were collected, being Anastrepha spp. the main genus of fruit fly in the region. The Ceratrap product proved to be superior, followed by Torula, Isca Mosca, and Bio Anastrepha; Isca Samaritá and guava juice presented the lowest results. The standard trapping of females was like the total. The uniformity of attraction presented a drop in all treatments, and Ceratrap was more constant after seven days. The correlations between meteorological factors and population variation were positive and significant only for precipitation. The most expensive treatments (Ceratrap and Torula) were also the most efficient and selective, and the Ceratrap product required less manpower. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-2 2021-07-14T10:33:33Z 2021-07-14T10:33:33Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000682018 Arquivos do Instituto Biológico. Instituto Biológico, v. 86, p. -, 2019. 0020-3653 1808-1657 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212038 10.1590/1808-1657000682018 S1808-16572019000100242 S1808-16572019000100242.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000682018 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212038 |
identifier_str_mv |
Arquivos do Instituto Biológico. Instituto Biológico, v. 86, p. -, 2019. 0020-3653 1808-1657 10.1590/1808-1657000682018 S1808-16572019000100242 S1808-16572019000100242.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos do Instituto Biológico |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
- application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Biológico |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Biológico |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129044406861824 |