Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Galli, Juliana Altafin
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Michelotto, Marcos Doniseti, Carrega, Willians Cesar [UNESP], Fischer, Ivan Herman
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000682018
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212038
Resumo: Fruit flies are the biggest obstacle in guava cultivation, with the monitoring of population a fundamental aspect for their management. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of attractive lures for fruit flies in guava trees, produced in an organic system. McPhail traps were installed with 400 mL of solution, in four repetitions, and distributed in randomized blocks in six treatments: Isca Mosca® (5%); Isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); Torula® yeast; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® and guava juice (50%), with 3 weekly reviews. Data on capture were subjected to analysis of variance, and averages were compared (Tukey 5%). The values of fly trap per day (FTD) were computed. The correlation between flies and meteorological variables were evaluated, as well as the monthly cost of lures. A total of 37,917 individuals from the genus Anastrepha and 122 species of flies Ceratitis capitata were collected, being Anastrepha spp. the main genus of fruit fly in the region. The Ceratrap product proved to be superior, followed by Torula, Isca Mosca, and Bio Anastrepha; Isca Samaritá and guava juice presented the lowest results. The standard trapping of females was like the total. The uniformity of attraction presented a drop in all treatments, and Ceratrap was more constant after seven days. The correlations between meteorological factors and population variation were positive and significant only for precipitation. The most expensive treatments (Ceratrap and Torula) were also the most efficient and selective, and the Ceratrap product required less manpower.
id UNSP_8b4d831ccf703cc5f2883957ac898e07
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/212038
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchardIscas atrativas para a mosca-das-frutas em um pomar orgânico de goiabaPsidium guajavaAnastrepha spp.population monitoringPsidium guajavaAnastrepha spp.monitoramento populacionalFruit flies are the biggest obstacle in guava cultivation, with the monitoring of population a fundamental aspect for their management. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of attractive lures for fruit flies in guava trees, produced in an organic system. McPhail traps were installed with 400 mL of solution, in four repetitions, and distributed in randomized blocks in six treatments: Isca Mosca® (5%); Isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); Torula® yeast; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® and guava juice (50%), with 3 weekly reviews. Data on capture were subjected to analysis of variance, and averages were compared (Tukey 5%). The values of fly trap per day (FTD) were computed. The correlation between flies and meteorological variables were evaluated, as well as the monthly cost of lures. A total of 37,917 individuals from the genus Anastrepha and 122 species of flies Ceratitis capitata were collected, being Anastrepha spp. the main genus of fruit fly in the region. The Ceratrap product proved to be superior, followed by Torula, Isca Mosca, and Bio Anastrepha; Isca Samaritá and guava juice presented the lowest results. The standard trapping of females was like the total. The uniformity of attraction presented a drop in all treatments, and Ceratrap was more constant after seven days. The correlations between meteorological factors and population variation were positive and significant only for precipitation. The most expensive treatments (Ceratrap and Torula) were also the most efficient and selective, and the Ceratrap product required less manpower.A presença de mosca-das-frutas é o maior obstáculo à produção de goiabas, sendo o monitoramento populacional de fundamental importância para seu manejo. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a eficácia de iscas atrativas para mosca-das-frutas em goiabeiras, produzidas em um sistema orgânico. Foram instaladas armadilhas McPhail contendo 400 mL de solução, em quatro repetições e distribuição em blocos randomizados, em seis tratamentos: isca Mosca® (5%); isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); levedura Torula®; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® e suco de goiaba (50%), com 3 avaliações semanais. Os dados da captura foram submetidos à análise de variância e às médias comparadas (Tukey 5%). Os valores de Mosca por Armadilha por Dia (MAD) foram calculados. A correlação entre moscas e as variáveis meteorológicas foi avaliada e o custo mensal das iscas foi calculado. Foram coletados 37.917 indivíduos do gênero Anastrepha e 122 moscas da espécie Ceratitis capitata, sendo a Anastrepha spp. o principal gênero de mosca-das-frutas da região. O produto Ceratrap mostrou-se superior, seguido pelas iscas Torula, Isca Mosca e Bio Anastrepha; a Isca Samaritá e o suco de goiaba apresentaram os menores resultados de captura. O padrão de captura de fêmeas foi semelhante ao total. Verificou-se uma queda na uniformidade de atração de todos os tratamentos, sendo o Ceratrap o que apresentou maior constância após sete dias. As correlações entre os fatores meteorológicos e a flutuação populacional foram positivas e significativas apenas para a precipitação. Os tratamentos mais onerosos (Ceratrap e Torula) também foram os mais eficientes e seletivos, sendo o produto Ceratrap o que demandou menor mão de obra.Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos AgronegóciosUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e VeterináriasUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e VeterináriasInstituto BiológicoAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos AgronegóciosUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Galli, Juliana AltafinMichelotto, Marcos DonisetiCarrega, Willians Cesar [UNESP]Fischer, Ivan Herman2021-07-14T10:33:33Z2021-07-14T10:33:33Z2019-12-2info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000682018Arquivos do Instituto Biológico. Instituto Biológico, v. 86, p. -, 2019.0020-36531808-1657http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21203810.1590/1808-1657000682018S1808-16572019000100242S1808-16572019000100242.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengArquivos do Instituto Biológicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-02T06:10:50Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/212038Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:16:27.873747Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
Iscas atrativas para a mosca-das-frutas em um pomar orgânico de goiaba
title Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
spellingShingle Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
Galli, Juliana Altafin
Psidium guajava
Anastrepha spp.
population monitoring
Psidium guajava
Anastrepha spp.
monitoramento populacional
title_short Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
title_full Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
title_fullStr Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
title_full_unstemmed Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
title_sort Attractive lures for fruit flies in an organic guava orchard
author Galli, Juliana Altafin
author_facet Galli, Juliana Altafin
Michelotto, Marcos Doniseti
Carrega, Willians Cesar [UNESP]
Fischer, Ivan Herman
author_role author
author2 Michelotto, Marcos Doniseti
Carrega, Willians Cesar [UNESP]
Fischer, Ivan Herman
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Galli, Juliana Altafin
Michelotto, Marcos Doniseti
Carrega, Willians Cesar [UNESP]
Fischer, Ivan Herman
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Psidium guajava
Anastrepha spp.
population monitoring
Psidium guajava
Anastrepha spp.
monitoramento populacional
topic Psidium guajava
Anastrepha spp.
population monitoring
Psidium guajava
Anastrepha spp.
monitoramento populacional
description Fruit flies are the biggest obstacle in guava cultivation, with the monitoring of population a fundamental aspect for their management. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of attractive lures for fruit flies in guava trees, produced in an organic system. McPhail traps were installed with 400 mL of solution, in four repetitions, and distributed in randomized blocks in six treatments: Isca Mosca® (5%); Isca Samaritá Tradicional® (5%); Torula® yeast; Bio Anastrepha® (5%); Ceratrap® and guava juice (50%), with 3 weekly reviews. Data on capture were subjected to analysis of variance, and averages were compared (Tukey 5%). The values of fly trap per day (FTD) were computed. The correlation between flies and meteorological variables were evaluated, as well as the monthly cost of lures. A total of 37,917 individuals from the genus Anastrepha and 122 species of flies Ceratitis capitata were collected, being Anastrepha spp. the main genus of fruit fly in the region. The Ceratrap product proved to be superior, followed by Torula, Isca Mosca, and Bio Anastrepha; Isca Samaritá and guava juice presented the lowest results. The standard trapping of females was like the total. The uniformity of attraction presented a drop in all treatments, and Ceratrap was more constant after seven days. The correlations between meteorological factors and population variation were positive and significant only for precipitation. The most expensive treatments (Ceratrap and Torula) were also the most efficient and selective, and the Ceratrap product required less manpower.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-2
2021-07-14T10:33:33Z
2021-07-14T10:33:33Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000682018
Arquivos do Instituto Biológico. Instituto Biológico, v. 86, p. -, 2019.
0020-3653
1808-1657
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212038
10.1590/1808-1657000682018
S1808-16572019000100242
S1808-16572019000100242.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657000682018
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/212038
identifier_str_mv Arquivos do Instituto Biológico. Instituto Biológico, v. 86, p. -, 2019.
0020-3653
1808-1657
10.1590/1808-1657000682018
S1808-16572019000100242
S1808-16572019000100242.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos do Instituto Biológico
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv -
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Biológico
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Biológico
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129044406861824