EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572009000100009 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Serum samples from 200 vaccinated adult bovine females from two herds were analyzed by buffered antigen acidified plate test (AAT) (Rose Bengal Plate Test), indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAI), 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME) and complement fixation test (FC). For ELISAI, the fixed value of 45 percent positivity (PP) was used. Group A was composed of 100 animals, with description of reproductive disturbances compatible with brucellosis and reagent to the AAT. Group B was composed of 100 animals serologically free of B. abortus for at least two years. Additionally, all serum samples were tested using the AAT, the 2-ME and the FC to confirm negative status. The combination of two tests, FC and 2ME was used as the gold standard. The relative sensitivity and specificity and the Kappa were calculated for each test. The result of kappa for 2-ME in relation to the FC and of the AAT and the ELISAI in relation to the gold standard was, respectively, 0.78, 0.86 And 0.84. The relative sensitivities (Sr) were, respectively, 84.1% (53/63), 100% (53/53) and 98.1% (52/53), and the relative specificities (Er) were 93.3% (111/119), 90.1% (100/111) and 90.1% (100/111). For comparison between the ELISAI and the AAT, there was obtained a Kappa of 0.91, Sr of 93% (93/100) and Er of 98% (98/100). Conclusions: 1 The option of constituting the gold standard based on at least two tests was the most suitable for this study; 2 The ELISAI resulted in values of Sr and Er similar to the AAT. Therefore, the AAT and the ELISAI are good for screening in regard to the diagnosis of brucellosis. |
id |
IBIO-1_8fcce09a075320671c6c4104c9f38be5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1808-16572009000100009 |
network_acronym_str |
IBIO-1 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOSBovine brucellosisserum diagnosisindirect ELISA2-mercaptoethanol testcomplement fixation testABSTRACT Serum samples from 200 vaccinated adult bovine females from two herds were analyzed by buffered antigen acidified plate test (AAT) (Rose Bengal Plate Test), indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAI), 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME) and complement fixation test (FC). For ELISAI, the fixed value of 45 percent positivity (PP) was used. Group A was composed of 100 animals, with description of reproductive disturbances compatible with brucellosis and reagent to the AAT. Group B was composed of 100 animals serologically free of B. abortus for at least two years. Additionally, all serum samples were tested using the AAT, the 2-ME and the FC to confirm negative status. The combination of two tests, FC and 2ME was used as the gold standard. The relative sensitivity and specificity and the Kappa were calculated for each test. The result of kappa for 2-ME in relation to the FC and of the AAT and the ELISAI in relation to the gold standard was, respectively, 0.78, 0.86 And 0.84. The relative sensitivities (Sr) were, respectively, 84.1% (53/63), 100% (53/53) and 98.1% (52/53), and the relative specificities (Er) were 93.3% (111/119), 90.1% (100/111) and 90.1% (100/111). For comparison between the ELISAI and the AAT, there was obtained a Kappa of 0.91, Sr of 93% (93/100) and Er of 98% (98/100). Conclusions: 1 The option of constituting the gold standard based on at least two tests was the most suitable for this study; 2 The ELISAI resulted in values of Sr and Er similar to the AAT. Therefore, the AAT and the ELISAI are good for screening in regard to the diagnosis of brucellosis.Instituto Biológico2009-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572009000100009Arquivos do Instituto Biológico v.76 n.1 2009reponame:Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)instname:Instituto Biológico (IB)instacron:IBIO10.1590/1808-1657v76p0092009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaulin,L.M.S.Andrade-Pacheco,W.A.Castro,V.Federsoni,I.S.P.spa2021-05-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-16572009000100009Revistahttp://www.biologico.sp.gov.br/arquivos_bio.phphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@biologico.sp.gov.br1808-16570020-3653opendoar:2021-05-26T00:00Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) - Instituto Biológico (IB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS |
title |
EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS |
spellingShingle |
EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS Paulin,L.M.S. Bovine brucellosis serum diagnosis indirect ELISA 2-mercaptoethanol test complement fixation test |
title_short |
EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS |
title_full |
EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS |
title_fullStr |
EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS |
title_full_unstemmed |
EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS |
title_sort |
EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS |
author |
Paulin,L.M.S. |
author_facet |
Paulin,L.M.S. Andrade-Pacheco,W.A. Castro,V. Federsoni,I.S.P. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Andrade-Pacheco,W.A. Castro,V. Federsoni,I.S.P. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paulin,L.M.S. Andrade-Pacheco,W.A. Castro,V. Federsoni,I.S.P. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bovine brucellosis serum diagnosis indirect ELISA 2-mercaptoethanol test complement fixation test |
topic |
Bovine brucellosis serum diagnosis indirect ELISA 2-mercaptoethanol test complement fixation test |
description |
ABSTRACT Serum samples from 200 vaccinated adult bovine females from two herds were analyzed by buffered antigen acidified plate test (AAT) (Rose Bengal Plate Test), indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAI), 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME) and complement fixation test (FC). For ELISAI, the fixed value of 45 percent positivity (PP) was used. Group A was composed of 100 animals, with description of reproductive disturbances compatible with brucellosis and reagent to the AAT. Group B was composed of 100 animals serologically free of B. abortus for at least two years. Additionally, all serum samples were tested using the AAT, the 2-ME and the FC to confirm negative status. The combination of two tests, FC and 2ME was used as the gold standard. The relative sensitivity and specificity and the Kappa were calculated for each test. The result of kappa for 2-ME in relation to the FC and of the AAT and the ELISAI in relation to the gold standard was, respectively, 0.78, 0.86 And 0.84. The relative sensitivities (Sr) were, respectively, 84.1% (53/63), 100% (53/53) and 98.1% (52/53), and the relative specificities (Er) were 93.3% (111/119), 90.1% (100/111) and 90.1% (100/111). For comparison between the ELISAI and the AAT, there was obtained a Kappa of 0.91, Sr of 93% (93/100) and Er of 98% (98/100). Conclusions: 1 The option of constituting the gold standard based on at least two tests was the most suitable for this study; 2 The ELISAI resulted in values of Sr and Er similar to the AAT. Therefore, the AAT and the ELISAI are good for screening in regard to the diagnosis of brucellosis. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572009000100009 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572009000100009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1808-1657v76p0092009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Biológico |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Biológico |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos do Instituto Biológico v.76 n.1 2009 reponame:Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) instname:Instituto Biológico (IB) instacron:IBIO |
instname_str |
Instituto Biológico (IB) |
instacron_str |
IBIO |
institution |
IBIO |
reponame_str |
Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) - Instituto Biológico (IB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||arquivos@biologico.sp.gov.br |
_version_ |
1754193667680108544 |