EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paulin,L.M.S.
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Andrade-Pacheco,W.A., Castro,V., Federsoni,I.S.P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572009000100009
Resumo: ABSTRACT Serum samples from 200 vaccinated adult bovine females from two herds were analyzed by buffered antigen acidified plate test (AAT) (Rose Bengal Plate Test), indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAI), 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME) and complement fixation test (FC). For ELISAI, the fixed value of 45 percent positivity (PP) was used. Group A was composed of 100 animals, with description of reproductive disturbances compatible with brucellosis and reagent to the AAT. Group B was composed of 100 animals serologically free of B. abortus for at least two years. Additionally, all serum samples were tested using the AAT, the 2-ME and the FC to confirm negative status. The combination of two tests, FC and 2ME was used as the gold standard. The relative sensitivity and specificity and the Kappa were calculated for each test. The result of kappa for 2-ME in relation to the FC and of the AAT and the ELISAI in relation to the gold standard was, respectively, 0.78, 0.86 And 0.84. The relative sensitivities (Sr) were, respectively, 84.1% (53/63), 100% (53/53) and 98.1% (52/53), and the relative specificities (Er) were 93.3% (111/119), 90.1% (100/111) and 90.1% (100/111). For comparison between the ELISAI and the AAT, there was obtained a Kappa of 0.91, Sr of 93% (93/100) and Er of 98% (98/100). Conclusions: 1 The option of constituting the gold standard based on at least two tests was the most suitable for this study; 2 The ELISAI resulted in values of Sr and Er similar to the AAT. Therefore, the AAT and the ELISAI are good for screening in regard to the diagnosis of brucellosis.
id IBIO-1_8fcce09a075320671c6c4104c9f38be5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-16572009000100009
network_acronym_str IBIO-1
network_name_str Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOSBovine brucellosisserum diagnosisindirect ELISA2-mercaptoethanol testcomplement fixation testABSTRACT Serum samples from 200 vaccinated adult bovine females from two herds were analyzed by buffered antigen acidified plate test (AAT) (Rose Bengal Plate Test), indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAI), 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME) and complement fixation test (FC). For ELISAI, the fixed value of 45 percent positivity (PP) was used. Group A was composed of 100 animals, with description of reproductive disturbances compatible with brucellosis and reagent to the AAT. Group B was composed of 100 animals serologically free of B. abortus for at least two years. Additionally, all serum samples were tested using the AAT, the 2-ME and the FC to confirm negative status. The combination of two tests, FC and 2ME was used as the gold standard. The relative sensitivity and specificity and the Kappa were calculated for each test. The result of kappa for 2-ME in relation to the FC and of the AAT and the ELISAI in relation to the gold standard was, respectively, 0.78, 0.86 And 0.84. The relative sensitivities (Sr) were, respectively, 84.1% (53/63), 100% (53/53) and 98.1% (52/53), and the relative specificities (Er) were 93.3% (111/119), 90.1% (100/111) and 90.1% (100/111). For comparison between the ELISAI and the AAT, there was obtained a Kappa of 0.91, Sr of 93% (93/100) and Er of 98% (98/100). Conclusions: 1 The option of constituting the gold standard based on at least two tests was the most suitable for this study; 2 The ELISAI resulted in values of Sr and Er similar to the AAT. Therefore, the AAT and the ELISAI are good for screening in regard to the diagnosis of brucellosis.Instituto Biológico2009-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572009000100009Arquivos do Instituto Biológico v.76 n.1 2009reponame:Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)instname:Instituto Biológico (IB)instacron:IBIO10.1590/1808-1657v76p0092009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaulin,L.M.S.Andrade-Pacheco,W.A.Castro,V.Federsoni,I.S.P.spa2021-05-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-16572009000100009Revistahttp://www.biologico.sp.gov.br/arquivos_bio.phphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@biologico.sp.gov.br1808-16570020-3653opendoar:2021-05-26T00:00Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) - Instituto Biológico (IB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS
title EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS
spellingShingle EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS
Paulin,L.M.S.
Bovine brucellosis
serum diagnosis
indirect ELISA
2-mercaptoethanol test
complement fixation test
title_short EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS
title_full EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS
title_fullStr EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS
title_full_unstemmed EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS
title_sort EVALUACIÓN ENTRE CUATRO TÉCNICAS SEROLÓGICAS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO DE INFECCIONES CAUSADAS POR BRUCELLA ABORTUS EN BOVINOS
author Paulin,L.M.S.
author_facet Paulin,L.M.S.
Andrade-Pacheco,W.A.
Castro,V.
Federsoni,I.S.P.
author_role author
author2 Andrade-Pacheco,W.A.
Castro,V.
Federsoni,I.S.P.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paulin,L.M.S.
Andrade-Pacheco,W.A.
Castro,V.
Federsoni,I.S.P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bovine brucellosis
serum diagnosis
indirect ELISA
2-mercaptoethanol test
complement fixation test
topic Bovine brucellosis
serum diagnosis
indirect ELISA
2-mercaptoethanol test
complement fixation test
description ABSTRACT Serum samples from 200 vaccinated adult bovine females from two herds were analyzed by buffered antigen acidified plate test (AAT) (Rose Bengal Plate Test), indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAI), 2-mercaptoethanol test (2-ME) and complement fixation test (FC). For ELISAI, the fixed value of 45 percent positivity (PP) was used. Group A was composed of 100 animals, with description of reproductive disturbances compatible with brucellosis and reagent to the AAT. Group B was composed of 100 animals serologically free of B. abortus for at least two years. Additionally, all serum samples were tested using the AAT, the 2-ME and the FC to confirm negative status. The combination of two tests, FC and 2ME was used as the gold standard. The relative sensitivity and specificity and the Kappa were calculated for each test. The result of kappa for 2-ME in relation to the FC and of the AAT and the ELISAI in relation to the gold standard was, respectively, 0.78, 0.86 And 0.84. The relative sensitivities (Sr) were, respectively, 84.1% (53/63), 100% (53/53) and 98.1% (52/53), and the relative specificities (Er) were 93.3% (111/119), 90.1% (100/111) and 90.1% (100/111). For comparison between the ELISAI and the AAT, there was obtained a Kappa of 0.91, Sr of 93% (93/100) and Er of 98% (98/100). Conclusions: 1 The option of constituting the gold standard based on at least two tests was the most suitable for this study; 2 The ELISAI resulted in values of Sr and Er similar to the AAT. Therefore, the AAT and the ELISAI are good for screening in regard to the diagnosis of brucellosis.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572009000100009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572009000100009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1808-1657v76p0092009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Biológico
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Biológico
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos do Instituto Biológico v.76 n.1 2009
reponame:Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
instname:Instituto Biológico (IB)
instacron:IBIO
instname_str Instituto Biológico (IB)
instacron_str IBIO
institution IBIO
reponame_str Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
collection Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online) - Instituto Biológico (IB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||arquivos@biologico.sp.gov.br
_version_ 1754193667680108544