Prebiotic effects of inulin extracted from burdock (Arctium lappa) in broilers

• Autor(a) principal: Itaya,Nair Massumi
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Outros Autores: Oliveira,Maria Gabriela Xavier de, Oliveira,Mirela Caroline Vilela de, Porreta,Camila, Menão,Márcia Cristina, Borges,Ricardo Moraes, Silva,José Roberto Machado Cunha da, Borges,João Carlos Shimada, Knöbl,Terezinha
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Arquivos do instituto biológico (Online)
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-16572017000100237
• topic: poultry; growth promoters; food additives; broilers; avian salmonellosis

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prebiotic effect of burdock (Arctium lappa) in commercial poultry. Four experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance parameters and the protection after challenge with Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Kedougou, with and without Bifidobacterium probiotic. In two trials, the chickens were fed with flour burdock 1% during 42 days. In the other two, the chickens were fed with fructan extracted from burdock (inulin), by gavage, at a concentration of 100 mg/bird, during the first three days of life. The results showed that the broilers treated with burdock flour showed underperformed, with less weight gain from the second week, and the worst results in the fattening stage. The treated birds had diarrhea and impaired intestinal integrity. However, the groups treated with the flour had a lower rate of intestinal colonization by Salmonella Kedougou, after challenge. No statistically significant differences were detected in the performance parameters of broilers receiving the inulin, and the morphometric analysis showed no lesions in the intestinal villi. However, there was no protection in the challenge with Salmonella Enteritidis, regardless of association with probiotic. These results demonstrated that the manner of administration has influence on the prebiotic effect of burdock. The burdock flour was administered for 42 days, which may have influenced intestinal mucosal injury. Instead, the inulin was given only in the first three days, which may have been insufficient for protection against Salmonella. New experiments are needed to determine an able formulation for a protective effect, without negative impact on growth, weight gain and feed conversion of the supplemented animals.