Comparison between simplified and FE models for short-term deflection in continuous RC beams
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952017000200415 |
Resumo: | Abstract In this work, a comparative study of different simplified methods and nonlinear finite element (FE) models used for calculating short-term deflections (vertical displacements of the longitudinal axis) in continuous reinforced concrete (RC) beams, under service loads, is performed. The simplified methods employed are the one proposed by Branson and the bilinear method recommended by the European Code CEB - Design Manual on Cracking and Deformations. Two finite element models are utilized: the first one with frame elements in which material nonlinearities are considered along the element and its cross section divided into layers, by using of constitutive relationships for steel and concrete, while the second one utilizes beam elements, with physical nonlinearity considered by means of moment-curvature diagrams, obtained from Branson equation. Several examples of continuous RC beams under service loads are analysed and the results obtained by the different models are compared taking as reference the nonlinear frame element model. A few conclusions and recommendations regarding the use of the different methods are drawn at the end of the work. |
id |
IBRACON-1_0ed19103e21a5313a7ad07a91dd6ee10 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1983-41952017000200415 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRACON-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between simplified and FE models for short-term deflection in continuous RC beamsdeflectionsbeamsreinforced concretenonlinear analysisAbstract In this work, a comparative study of different simplified methods and nonlinear finite element (FE) models used for calculating short-term deflections (vertical displacements of the longitudinal axis) in continuous reinforced concrete (RC) beams, under service loads, is performed. The simplified methods employed are the one proposed by Branson and the bilinear method recommended by the European Code CEB - Design Manual on Cracking and Deformations. Two finite element models are utilized: the first one with frame elements in which material nonlinearities are considered along the element and its cross section divided into layers, by using of constitutive relationships for steel and concrete, while the second one utilizes beam elements, with physical nonlinearity considered by means of moment-curvature diagrams, obtained from Branson equation. Several examples of continuous RC beams under service loads are analysed and the results obtained by the different models are compared taking as reference the nonlinear frame element model. A few conclusions and recommendations regarding the use of the different methods are drawn at the end of the work.IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952017000200415Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.10 n.2 2017reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiaisinstname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)instacron:IBRACON10.1590/s1983-41952017000200007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJUNGES,E.ROVERE,H.L. LAeng2017-06-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1983-41952017000200415Revistahttp://www.revistas.ibracon.org.br/index.php/riemhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpeditores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br1983-41951983-4195opendoar:2017-06-08T00:00Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between simplified and FE models for short-term deflection in continuous RC beams |
title |
Comparison between simplified and FE models for short-term deflection in continuous RC beams |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between simplified and FE models for short-term deflection in continuous RC beams JUNGES,E. deflections beams reinforced concrete nonlinear analysis |
title_short |
Comparison between simplified and FE models for short-term deflection in continuous RC beams |
title_full |
Comparison between simplified and FE models for short-term deflection in continuous RC beams |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between simplified and FE models for short-term deflection in continuous RC beams |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between simplified and FE models for short-term deflection in continuous RC beams |
title_sort |
Comparison between simplified and FE models for short-term deflection in continuous RC beams |
author |
JUNGES,E. |
author_facet |
JUNGES,E. ROVERE,H.L. LA |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
ROVERE,H.L. LA |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
JUNGES,E. ROVERE,H.L. LA |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
deflections beams reinforced concrete nonlinear analysis |
topic |
deflections beams reinforced concrete nonlinear analysis |
description |
Abstract In this work, a comparative study of different simplified methods and nonlinear finite element (FE) models used for calculating short-term deflections (vertical displacements of the longitudinal axis) in continuous reinforced concrete (RC) beams, under service loads, is performed. The simplified methods employed are the one proposed by Branson and the bilinear method recommended by the European Code CEB - Design Manual on Cracking and Deformations. Two finite element models are utilized: the first one with frame elements in which material nonlinearities are considered along the element and its cross section divided into layers, by using of constitutive relationships for steel and concrete, while the second one utilizes beam elements, with physical nonlinearity considered by means of moment-curvature diagrams, obtained from Branson equation. Several examples of continuous RC beams under service loads are analysed and the results obtained by the different models are compared taking as reference the nonlinear frame element model. A few conclusions and recommendations regarding the use of the different methods are drawn at the end of the work. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952017000200415 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952017000200415 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1983-41952017000200007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IBRACON - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais v.10 n.2 2017 reponame:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais instname:Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON) instacron:IBRACON |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON) |
instacron_str |
IBRACON |
institution |
IBRACON |
reponame_str |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
collection |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais - Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editores.riem@gmail.com||arlene@ibracon.org.br |
_version_ |
1754193605188124672 |