Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Romão, Vinícius de Assis
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425
Resumo: The article’s question is about how provisional measures are applied in encounters between legal actors and homeless people in custody hearings, based on the procedural of debating and deciding. Data collection took place at the Núcleo de Prisão em Flagrante e Audiências de Custódia in Salvador, in two periods of the year 2018, to understand the meanings conferred by judges, prosecutors and defenders regarding provisional measures in kind. Among the observation of hearings with 69 in custody, the research had as an operational sample cases of 19 people living on the streets. In relation to these, a documentary analysis was also carried out of the 19 flagrant arrest records and 52 past cases, including criminal actions and flagrant arrest records, which were recorded as criminal records. Expanding the analysis beyond the mere absence or insufficiency of reasoning in the decisions and analyzing the “paredão” technique as an informal hearing procedure, the hidden features that have been attributed to the provisional measures were analyzed, in each context of punitive demand, along the logic of “perspective prison”. The work concludes that the measures considered as alternatives, in addition to not being discussed under the legal criteria, exercise a punitive anticipation function and are inserted in the urban socio-racial management, presenting deeper connections with the pre-trial prison, which is maintained in its horizon.
id IBRASPP-1_2a97b4173a566ac0356b052c7eab4fe4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/425
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.A aplicação de medidas cautelares pessoais em audiências de custódia: um olhar a partir da prisão em flagrante de pessoas em situação de ruaProvisional MeasuresCustody HearingsHomeless peopleJudicial procedure.Medidas cautelares diversas da prisãoAudiência de custódiaPessoas em situação de ruaatuação judicial.The article’s question is about how provisional measures are applied in encounters between legal actors and homeless people in custody hearings, based on the procedural of debating and deciding. Data collection took place at the Núcleo de Prisão em Flagrante e Audiências de Custódia in Salvador, in two periods of the year 2018, to understand the meanings conferred by judges, prosecutors and defenders regarding provisional measures in kind. Among the observation of hearings with 69 in custody, the research had as an operational sample cases of 19 people living on the streets. In relation to these, a documentary analysis was also carried out of the 19 flagrant arrest records and 52 past cases, including criminal actions and flagrant arrest records, which were recorded as criminal records. Expanding the analysis beyond the mere absence or insufficiency of reasoning in the decisions and analyzing the “paredão” technique as an informal hearing procedure, the hidden features that have been attributed to the provisional measures were analyzed, in each context of punitive demand, along the logic of “perspective prison”. The work concludes that the measures considered as alternatives, in addition to not being discussed under the legal criteria, exercise a punitive anticipation function and are inserted in the urban socio-racial management, presenting deeper connections with the pre-trial prison, which is maintained in its horizon.O artigo partiu da pergunta: como ocorre a aplicação de medidas cautelares pessoais nos encontros presenciais entre atores jurídicos e pessoas em situação de rua em audiências de custódia? Realizou-se pesquisa de campo no Núcleo de Prisão em Flagrante e Audiências de Custódia de Salvador, em dois períodos do ano de 2018, coletando dados em distintos contextos de demanda por ordem na cidade, para entender os sentidos conferidos por juízes, promotores e defensores em relação às medidas cautelares em espécie. Dentre a observação de audiências com 69 custodiados, a pesquisa teve como amostra operacional casos de 19 pessoas em situação de rua. Em relação a estes, também foi realizada análise documental dos 19 autos de prisão em flagrante e 52 processos pretéritos, entre ações penais e autos de prisão em flagrante, que constavam como registros criminais. Expandindo a análise para além da mera ausência ou insuficiência de fundamentação nas decisões e analisando a técnica do “paredão” como procedimento informal de audiência, problematizou-se as funções não declaradas que vêm sendo atribuídas às medidas cautelares, a depender do contexto de demanda punitiva, e a conformação da lógica da “prisão a médio prazo”. O trabalho conclui que as medidas tidas como alternativas, além de não serem debatidas sob os critérios legais de cautelaridade, exercem uma função de antecipação punitiva e se inserem na gestão sociorracial urbana, apresentando conexões mais profundas com a prisão preventiva, que é mantida em seu horizonte.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2021-03-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/42510.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.425Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021); 611Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2021); 611Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 1 (2021); 611Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 1 (2021); 6112525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425/341https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425/362Copyright (c) 2021 Vinícius de Assis Romãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRomão, Vinícius de Assis2021-05-03T10:30:48Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/425Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2021-05-03T10:30:48Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.
A aplicação de medidas cautelares pessoais em audiências de custódia: um olhar a partir da prisão em flagrante de pessoas em situação de rua
title Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.
spellingShingle Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.
Romão, Vinícius de Assis
Provisional Measures
Custody Hearings
Homeless people
Judicial procedure.
Medidas cautelares diversas da prisão
Audiência de custódia
Pessoas em situação de rua
atuação judicial.
title_short Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.
title_full Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.
title_fullStr Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.
title_full_unstemmed Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.
title_sort Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.
author Romão, Vinícius de Assis
author_facet Romão, Vinícius de Assis
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Romão, Vinícius de Assis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Provisional Measures
Custody Hearings
Homeless people
Judicial procedure.
Medidas cautelares diversas da prisão
Audiência de custódia
Pessoas em situação de rua
atuação judicial.
topic Provisional Measures
Custody Hearings
Homeless people
Judicial procedure.
Medidas cautelares diversas da prisão
Audiência de custódia
Pessoas em situação de rua
atuação judicial.
description The article’s question is about how provisional measures are applied in encounters between legal actors and homeless people in custody hearings, based on the procedural of debating and deciding. Data collection took place at the Núcleo de Prisão em Flagrante e Audiências de Custódia in Salvador, in two periods of the year 2018, to understand the meanings conferred by judges, prosecutors and defenders regarding provisional measures in kind. Among the observation of hearings with 69 in custody, the research had as an operational sample cases of 19 people living on the streets. In relation to these, a documentary analysis was also carried out of the 19 flagrant arrest records and 52 past cases, including criminal actions and flagrant arrest records, which were recorded as criminal records. Expanding the analysis beyond the mere absence or insufficiency of reasoning in the decisions and analyzing the “paredão” technique as an informal hearing procedure, the hidden features that have been attributed to the provisional measures were analyzed, in each context of punitive demand, along the logic of “perspective prison”. The work concludes that the measures considered as alternatives, in addition to not being discussed under the legal criteria, exercise a punitive anticipation function and are inserted in the urban socio-racial management, presenting deeper connections with the pre-trial prison, which is maintained in its horizon.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425
10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.425
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.425
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425/341
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425/362
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Vinícius de Assis Romão
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Vinícius de Assis Romão
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021); 611
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2021); 611
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 1 (2021); 611
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 1 (2021); 611
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329402406207488