“No judge would allow that”: reflections about the prevention of torture in custody hearings based on a National Council of Justice hearing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brandão, Natália Barroso
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Antropolítica (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/57956
Resumo: This article aims to analyze the discourses and representations of legal professionals about the custody hearings institution. The discussion is developed from the observation of an audience that was held in November 24, 2020, by the National Council of Justice [Conselho Nacional de Justiça – CNJ] to decide about the holding custody hearings via videoconference during the covid-19 pandemic. By analyzing the counselors’ decisions and the amici curiae’s speeches – agents of several institutions who take part in the hearings providing information on a certain topic –, I intend to reflect about how the prevention of torture, pointed as one of the goals of the custody hearing institute, is understood by legal professionals, as well as about the moralities used to inform their speeches and decisions about the possibility of virtual custody hearings.
id UFF-18_486dc19cc3de01e76356cac47d21d4a4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/57956
network_acronym_str UFF-18
network_name_str Antropolítica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling “No judge would allow that”: reflections about the prevention of torture in custody hearings based on a National Council of Justice hearing“Nenhum juiz admitiria isso”: reflexões sobre a prevenção à tortura nas audiências de custódia a partir de uma audiência do Conselho Nacional de JustiçaAudiência de custódiaAntropologia do DireitoTortura.Custody hearingsAnthropology of lawTorture.This article aims to analyze the discourses and representations of legal professionals about the custody hearings institution. The discussion is developed from the observation of an audience that was held in November 24, 2020, by the National Council of Justice [Conselho Nacional de Justiça – CNJ] to decide about the holding custody hearings via videoconference during the covid-19 pandemic. By analyzing the counselors’ decisions and the amici curiae’s speeches – agents of several institutions who take part in the hearings providing information on a certain topic –, I intend to reflect about how the prevention of torture, pointed as one of the goals of the custody hearing institute, is understood by legal professionals, as well as about the moralities used to inform their speeches and decisions about the possibility of virtual custody hearings.Neste artigo proponho uma discussão a respeito das representações e dos discursos de diferentes atores do sistema de justiça sobre as audiências de custódia, seus objetivos e finalidades. A discussão parte da observação da audiência realizada no dia 24 de novembro de 2020 pelo Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ), para deliberar sobre a possibilidade de realização de audiências de custódia por videoconferência durante a pandemia de covid-19. A partir dos votos dos conselheiros e das falas dos amici curiae – representantes de instituições que participam da audiência fornecendo subsídios acerca de um determinado tema para as decisões dos tribunais – e da deliberação de seus membros a respeito da possibilidade da realização do ritual das audiências por meio virtual, busco refletir sobre a compreensão que os atores do Judiciário têm da prevenção à tortura, apontada como um dos principais objetivos das audiências de custódia, assim como sobre as moralidades mobilizadas por tais compreensões.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense2024-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/5795610.22409/antropolitica.i.a57956Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia; v. 56 n. 1 (2024): JAN/FEV/MAR/ABR2179-73311414-737810.22409/antropolitica.reponame:Antropolítica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/57956/36488https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/57956/36489Copyright (c) 2024 Natália Barroso Brandãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrandão, Natália Barroso2024-04-22T18:01:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/57956Revistahttp://www.revistas.uff.br/index.php/antropoliticaPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/oaiperiodicos@proppi.uff.br||antropoliticauff@gmail.com||lauragraziela@gmail.com2179-73312179-7331opendoar:2024-04-22T18:01:34Antropolítica (Online) - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “No judge would allow that”: reflections about the prevention of torture in custody hearings based on a National Council of Justice hearing
“Nenhum juiz admitiria isso”: reflexões sobre a prevenção à tortura nas audiências de custódia a partir de uma audiência do Conselho Nacional de Justiça
title “No judge would allow that”: reflections about the prevention of torture in custody hearings based on a National Council of Justice hearing
spellingShingle “No judge would allow that”: reflections about the prevention of torture in custody hearings based on a National Council of Justice hearing
Brandão, Natália Barroso
Audiência de custódia
Antropologia do Direito
Tortura.
Custody hearings
Anthropology of law
Torture.
title_short “No judge would allow that”: reflections about the prevention of torture in custody hearings based on a National Council of Justice hearing
title_full “No judge would allow that”: reflections about the prevention of torture in custody hearings based on a National Council of Justice hearing
title_fullStr “No judge would allow that”: reflections about the prevention of torture in custody hearings based on a National Council of Justice hearing
title_full_unstemmed “No judge would allow that”: reflections about the prevention of torture in custody hearings based on a National Council of Justice hearing
title_sort “No judge would allow that”: reflections about the prevention of torture in custody hearings based on a National Council of Justice hearing
author Brandão, Natália Barroso
author_facet Brandão, Natália Barroso
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brandão, Natália Barroso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Audiência de custódia
Antropologia do Direito
Tortura.
Custody hearings
Anthropology of law
Torture.
topic Audiência de custódia
Antropologia do Direito
Tortura.
Custody hearings
Anthropology of law
Torture.
description This article aims to analyze the discourses and representations of legal professionals about the custody hearings institution. The discussion is developed from the observation of an audience that was held in November 24, 2020, by the National Council of Justice [Conselho Nacional de Justiça – CNJ] to decide about the holding custody hearings via videoconference during the covid-19 pandemic. By analyzing the counselors’ decisions and the amici curiae’s speeches – agents of several institutions who take part in the hearings providing information on a certain topic –, I intend to reflect about how the prevention of torture, pointed as one of the goals of the custody hearing institute, is understood by legal professionals, as well as about the moralities used to inform their speeches and decisions about the possibility of virtual custody hearings.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/57956
10.22409/antropolitica.i.a57956
url https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/57956
identifier_str_mv 10.22409/antropolitica.i.a57956
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/57956/36488
https://periodicos.uff.br/antropolitica/article/view/57956/36489
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Natália Barroso Brandão
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Natália Barroso Brandão
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia; v. 56 n. 1 (2024): JAN/FEV/MAR/ABR
2179-7331
1414-7378
10.22409/antropolitica.
reponame:Antropolítica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Antropolítica (Online)
collection Antropolítica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Antropolítica (Online) - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv periodicos@proppi.uff.br||antropoliticauff@gmail.com||lauragraziela@gmail.com
_version_ 1797068792604393472

Registros relacionados