Crime victim and International Criminal Court: an undeniable model to the lawmaker

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Robalo, Teresa Lancry
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/349
Resumo: This paper aims at having a closer look to the level of protection afforded by the Rome Statute to crime victims, as well by its Rules of Procedure and Evidence. The Rome Statute, which encompasses both substantial and procedural norms, has taken the Statutes and the decisions adopted by the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunals for ex-Yugoslavia and Rwanda. However, the latter did not provide a clear model that aimed at victims’ protection. Therefore, Rome Statute and its Rules of Procedure and Evidence added a set of central measures that aim at protecting victims and witnesses, giving them the opportunity to take part in the process and granting them proper reparation. It shows up as being a paradigm to be taken into account by the internal legislator, even if the State is not a member of the Rome Statute. Hence, the role played by the international community in this regard must be taken into account by the legislator, allowing the victim to regain a conflict that indeed belongs to him/her, as previously argued by Nils Christie. This study makes use of a qualitative methodology, essentially taking literature into deep consideration and starting from the study of the innovation brought by the International Criminal Court on this matter. It is the author’s aim to emphasize its importance as a potential model to be offered to the national legislator. Our hypothesis relies on the assumption that the model created by the Rome Statute towards victims has the potential to be considered by national legislator.
id IBRASPP-1_2b19bc90c6b8f778cc667c3b3e55841f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/349
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Crime victim and International Criminal Court: an undeniable model to the lawmakerA vítima de crimes e o Tribunal Penal Internacional: um modelo irrefutável para o legislador internoInternational Criminal CourtParticipationProtectionReparationRome StatuteVictim.Estatuto de RomaParticipaçãoProteçãoReparaçãoTribunal Penal InternacionalVítima.This paper aims at having a closer look to the level of protection afforded by the Rome Statute to crime victims, as well by its Rules of Procedure and Evidence. The Rome Statute, which encompasses both substantial and procedural norms, has taken the Statutes and the decisions adopted by the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunals for ex-Yugoslavia and Rwanda. However, the latter did not provide a clear model that aimed at victims’ protection. Therefore, Rome Statute and its Rules of Procedure and Evidence added a set of central measures that aim at protecting victims and witnesses, giving them the opportunity to take part in the process and granting them proper reparation. It shows up as being a paradigm to be taken into account by the internal legislator, even if the State is not a member of the Rome Statute. Hence, the role played by the international community in this regard must be taken into account by the legislator, allowing the victim to regain a conflict that indeed belongs to him/her, as previously argued by Nils Christie. This study makes use of a qualitative methodology, essentially taking literature into deep consideration and starting from the study of the innovation brought by the International Criminal Court on this matter. It is the author’s aim to emphasize its importance as a potential model to be offered to the national legislator. Our hypothesis relies on the assumption that the model created by the Rome Statute towards victims has the potential to be considered by national legislator.O presente trabalho pretende analisar o nível de tutela conferida à vítima pelo Estatuto de Roma, que criou o Tribunal Penal Internacional, o qual abarca tanto uma vertente substantiva como processual, tendo levado em linha de conta os Estatutos, bem como as decisões tomadas pelos Tribunais Penais Internacionais ad hoc para a ex-Jugoslávia e para o Ruanda. Sucede, porém, que estes pecavam por não preverem um verdadeiro modelo em prol da vítima, pelo que o Estatuto de Roma, conjugado com o seu Regulamento de Procedimento e Prova, veio aditar um conjunto de medidas cruciais que visam proteger as vítimas e testemunhas, dar-lhes a possibilidade de participarem no processo e, ainda, garantir a reparação. Revela-se, pois, como um paradigma a ser levado em linha de conta pelo legislador interno, independentemente de o respetivo Estado ser ou não parte deste instrumento de Direito Internacional. Concluímos que o papel desempenhado pela comunidade internacional nesta chamada de atenção para a vítima deve ser levado em linha de conta em sede interna permitindo assim, com Nils Christie, que à vítima seja devolvido um conflito que é o seu. O presente estudo emprega uma metodologia qualitativa, atendendo essencialmente à doutrina e partindo da análise da inovação trazida pelo Tribunal Penal Internacional sobre esta temática. A hipótese que nos orienta reside na assunção de que o modelo apresentado pelo Estatuto de Roma em prol das vítimas tem potencial para ser levado em consideração pelo legislador interno.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/34910.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.349Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020); 1417-1444Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 3 (2020); 1417-1444Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 3 (2020); 1417-1444Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 3 (2020); 1417-14442525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/349/277https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/349/315Copyright (c) 2020 Teresa Lancry Robaloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRobalo, Teresa Lancry2021-01-13T07:57:16Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/349Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2021-01-13T07:57:16Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crime victim and International Criminal Court: an undeniable model to the lawmaker
A vítima de crimes e o Tribunal Penal Internacional: um modelo irrefutável para o legislador interno
title Crime victim and International Criminal Court: an undeniable model to the lawmaker
spellingShingle Crime victim and International Criminal Court: an undeniable model to the lawmaker
Robalo, Teresa Lancry
International Criminal Court
Participation
Protection
Reparation
Rome Statute
Victim.
Estatuto de Roma
Participação
Proteção
Reparação
Tribunal Penal Internacional
Vítima.
title_short Crime victim and International Criminal Court: an undeniable model to the lawmaker
title_full Crime victim and International Criminal Court: an undeniable model to the lawmaker
title_fullStr Crime victim and International Criminal Court: an undeniable model to the lawmaker
title_full_unstemmed Crime victim and International Criminal Court: an undeniable model to the lawmaker
title_sort Crime victim and International Criminal Court: an undeniable model to the lawmaker
author Robalo, Teresa Lancry
author_facet Robalo, Teresa Lancry
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Robalo, Teresa Lancry
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv International Criminal Court
Participation
Protection
Reparation
Rome Statute
Victim.
Estatuto de Roma
Participação
Proteção
Reparação
Tribunal Penal Internacional
Vítima.
topic International Criminal Court
Participation
Protection
Reparation
Rome Statute
Victim.
Estatuto de Roma
Participação
Proteção
Reparação
Tribunal Penal Internacional
Vítima.
description This paper aims at having a closer look to the level of protection afforded by the Rome Statute to crime victims, as well by its Rules of Procedure and Evidence. The Rome Statute, which encompasses both substantial and procedural norms, has taken the Statutes and the decisions adopted by the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunals for ex-Yugoslavia and Rwanda. However, the latter did not provide a clear model that aimed at victims’ protection. Therefore, Rome Statute and its Rules of Procedure and Evidence added a set of central measures that aim at protecting victims and witnesses, giving them the opportunity to take part in the process and granting them proper reparation. It shows up as being a paradigm to be taken into account by the internal legislator, even if the State is not a member of the Rome Statute. Hence, the role played by the international community in this regard must be taken into account by the legislator, allowing the victim to regain a conflict that indeed belongs to him/her, as previously argued by Nils Christie. This study makes use of a qualitative methodology, essentially taking literature into deep consideration and starting from the study of the innovation brought by the International Criminal Court on this matter. It is the author’s aim to emphasize its importance as a potential model to be offered to the national legislator. Our hypothesis relies on the assumption that the model created by the Rome Statute towards victims has the potential to be considered by national legislator.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/349
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.349
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/349
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.349
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/349/277
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/349/315
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Teresa Lancry Robalo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Teresa Lancry Robalo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020); 1417-1444
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 3 (2020); 1417-1444
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 3 (2020); 1417-1444
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 3 (2020); 1417-1444
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281940534067200