Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Marcos Paulo Dutra
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49
Resumo: This article analyzes the possibility of an unilateral plea bargain, not depending on a previous agreement with the prosecution. From the comparative study between the American and Italian bargained criminal justice and the one practiced in Brazil, it reveals the acceptance of this type of cooperation, according to the nature of the benefits involved, as a natural and inevitable consequence of the constitutional principles that guide Brazilian Criminal Procedure Law.
id IBRASPP-1_2d764ee3b12413e26c01ed2e91c8161b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/49
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelinesColaboração unilateral premiada como consectário lógico das balizas constitucionais do devido processo legal brasileiroUnilateral plea bargainJudicial controlProsecution.Colaboração Premiada UnilateralControle jurisdicionalMinistério Público.This article analyzes the possibility of an unilateral plea bargain, not depending on a previous agreement with the prosecution. From the comparative study between the American and Italian bargained criminal justice and the one practiced in Brazil, it reveals the acceptance of this type of cooperation, according to the nature of the benefits involved, as a natural and inevitable consequence of the constitutional principles that guide Brazilian Criminal Procedure Law.O artigo objetiva assentar a possibilidade da colaboração premiada unilateral, independentemente de acordo prévio com o Ministério Público. A partir do contraponto entre os modelos norte-americano e italiano de justiça penal negocial e o praticado no Brasil, demonstrar-se-á que a aceitação dessa modalidade de cooperação, considerada a natureza dos benefícios previstos em lei, é decorrência natural e inafastável dos princípios constitucionais informativos do ordenamento processual penal brasileiro.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2017-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/4910.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.49Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017); 131-166Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017); 131-166Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 1 (2017); 131-166Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 1 (2017); 131-1662525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49/55Copyright (c) 2017 Marcos Paulo Dutra Santosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Marcos Paulo Dutra2017-06-08T17:40:58Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/49Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2017-06-08T17:40:58Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines
Colaboração unilateral premiada como consectário lógico das balizas constitucionais do devido processo legal brasileiro
title Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines
spellingShingle Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines
Santos, Marcos Paulo Dutra
Unilateral plea bargain
Judicial control
Prosecution.
Colaboração Premiada Unilateral
Controle jurisdicional
Ministério Público.
title_short Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines
title_full Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines
title_fullStr Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines
title_sort Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines
author Santos, Marcos Paulo Dutra
author_facet Santos, Marcos Paulo Dutra
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Marcos Paulo Dutra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Unilateral plea bargain
Judicial control
Prosecution.
Colaboração Premiada Unilateral
Controle jurisdicional
Ministério Público.
topic Unilateral plea bargain
Judicial control
Prosecution.
Colaboração Premiada Unilateral
Controle jurisdicional
Ministério Público.
description This article analyzes the possibility of an unilateral plea bargain, not depending on a previous agreement with the prosecution. From the comparative study between the American and Italian bargained criminal justice and the one practiced in Brazil, it reveals the acceptance of this type of cooperation, according to the nature of the benefits involved, as a natural and inevitable consequence of the constitutional principles that guide Brazilian Criminal Procedure Law.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.49
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.49
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49/55
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Marcos Paulo Dutra Santos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Marcos Paulo Dutra Santos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017); 131-166
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017); 131-166
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 1 (2017); 131-166
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 1 (2017); 131-166
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329401296814080