The participative construction of the criminal decision in democratic states ruled by the law: the guaranty of participation of the parties, through confrontation, in the composition of a fair and legitimate decision
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/83 |
Resumo: | This article concerns a topic that is not new, but it remains current: the participatory construction of the criminal decision in a democratic State ruled by law. Starting from the concepts of Rule of Law, of Guarantism and of Democracy, it seeks to renew the importance of the equal and dialectical participation of the parties, through the adversarial system, for the composition of a fair and legitimate criminal judicial decision. It is argued, from this perspective, that the parties should take the role of protagonists in the procedural scenario, since the decision should be built in a participatory way, i.e., based on the arguments and evidence presented, thus reducing the gaps that favor judicial discretion and decisionism. It is proposed, therefore, that the solution to the concrete case (acceptance or dismissal of the information or indictment, grant or rejection of a criminal precautionary measure, conviction or acquittal) should be elaborated with support on the contribution of the litigants, from the contrast of their arguments and of the evidence produced, in adversarial proceedings, in the regular course of the process. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_2fd8d5532f87b0bd164255ae4450d7f4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/83 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The participative construction of the criminal decision in democratic states ruled by the law: the guaranty of participation of the parties, through confrontation, in the composition of a fair and legitimate decisionA construção participada da decisão penal no estado democrático de direito: a garantia de participação das partes, pelo contraditório, na composição da decisão justa e legítimaCriminal procedural lawrule of lawguarantismdemocracyguarantee of contradictory principlecriminal decisionparticipative construction.Direito processual penalestado de direitogarantismodemocraciagarantia do contraditóriodecisão penalconstrução participada.This article concerns a topic that is not new, but it remains current: the participatory construction of the criminal decision in a democratic State ruled by law. Starting from the concepts of Rule of Law, of Guarantism and of Democracy, it seeks to renew the importance of the equal and dialectical participation of the parties, through the adversarial system, for the composition of a fair and legitimate criminal judicial decision. It is argued, from this perspective, that the parties should take the role of protagonists in the procedural scenario, since the decision should be built in a participatory way, i.e., based on the arguments and evidence presented, thus reducing the gaps that favor judicial discretion and decisionism. It is proposed, therefore, that the solution to the concrete case (acceptance or dismissal of the information or indictment, grant or rejection of a criminal precautionary measure, conviction or acquittal) should be elaborated with support on the contribution of the litigants, from the contrast of their arguments and of the evidence produced, in adversarial proceedings, in the regular course of the process.O presente artigo versa sobre um tema que não é novo, mas se mantém atual: a construção participada da decisão penal no Estado Democrático de Direito. A partir das noções de Estado de Direito, de Garantismo e de Democracia, busca-se (re)avivar a importância da participação paritária e dialética das partes na gestação da decisão criminal. Como as partes, pelo contraditório, devem cooperar para a composição do provimento jurisdicional criminal justo e legítimo? Defende-se, nessa perspectiva, que as partes assumam o papel de protagonistas no cenário processual, na medida em que a decisão deve ser construída de forma participada, isto é, com base nos argumentos e nas provas que apresentarem, diminuindo-se os espaços que favorecem o arbítrio judicial e o decisionismo. Propõe-se, portanto, que a solução para o caso concreto (recebimento ou indeferimento da denúncia, deferimento ou rejeição de uma medida cautelar penal, condenação ou absolvição) deve ser elaborada com suporte na contribuição dos litigantes, desde o contraste de seus argumentos e das provas que produziram, em contraditório, no regular curso do processo.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2017-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/8310.22197/rbdpp.v3i3.83Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2017); 1007-1041Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2017); 1007-1041Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 3 (2017); 1007-1041Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 3 (2017); 1007-10412525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v3i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/83/95Copyright (c) 2017 Flávio da Silva Andradeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Flávio da Silva2017-10-15T19:43:50Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/83Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2017-10-15T19:43:50Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The participative construction of the criminal decision in democratic states ruled by the law: the guaranty of participation of the parties, through confrontation, in the composition of a fair and legitimate decision A construção participada da decisão penal no estado democrático de direito: a garantia de participação das partes, pelo contraditório, na composição da decisão justa e legítima |
title |
The participative construction of the criminal decision in democratic states ruled by the law: the guaranty of participation of the parties, through confrontation, in the composition of a fair and legitimate decision |
spellingShingle |
The participative construction of the criminal decision in democratic states ruled by the law: the guaranty of participation of the parties, through confrontation, in the composition of a fair and legitimate decision Andrade, Flávio da Silva Criminal procedural law rule of law guarantism democracy guarantee of contradictory principle criminal decision participative construction. Direito processual penal estado de direito garantismo democracia garantia do contraditório decisão penal construção participada. |
title_short |
The participative construction of the criminal decision in democratic states ruled by the law: the guaranty of participation of the parties, through confrontation, in the composition of a fair and legitimate decision |
title_full |
The participative construction of the criminal decision in democratic states ruled by the law: the guaranty of participation of the parties, through confrontation, in the composition of a fair and legitimate decision |
title_fullStr |
The participative construction of the criminal decision in democratic states ruled by the law: the guaranty of participation of the parties, through confrontation, in the composition of a fair and legitimate decision |
title_full_unstemmed |
The participative construction of the criminal decision in democratic states ruled by the law: the guaranty of participation of the parties, through confrontation, in the composition of a fair and legitimate decision |
title_sort |
The participative construction of the criminal decision in democratic states ruled by the law: the guaranty of participation of the parties, through confrontation, in the composition of a fair and legitimate decision |
author |
Andrade, Flávio da Silva |
author_facet |
Andrade, Flávio da Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Flávio da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Criminal procedural law rule of law guarantism democracy guarantee of contradictory principle criminal decision participative construction. Direito processual penal estado de direito garantismo democracia garantia do contraditório decisão penal construção participada. |
topic |
Criminal procedural law rule of law guarantism democracy guarantee of contradictory principle criminal decision participative construction. Direito processual penal estado de direito garantismo democracia garantia do contraditório decisão penal construção participada. |
description |
This article concerns a topic that is not new, but it remains current: the participatory construction of the criminal decision in a democratic State ruled by law. Starting from the concepts of Rule of Law, of Guarantism and of Democracy, it seeks to renew the importance of the equal and dialectical participation of the parties, through the adversarial system, for the composition of a fair and legitimate criminal judicial decision. It is argued, from this perspective, that the parties should take the role of protagonists in the procedural scenario, since the decision should be built in a participatory way, i.e., based on the arguments and evidence presented, thus reducing the gaps that favor judicial discretion and decisionism. It is proposed, therefore, that the solution to the concrete case (acceptance or dismissal of the information or indictment, grant or rejection of a criminal precautionary measure, conviction or acquittal) should be elaborated with support on the contribution of the litigants, from the contrast of their arguments and of the evidence produced, in adversarial proceedings, in the regular course of the process. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/83 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i3.83 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/83 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i3.83 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/83/95 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Flávio da Silva Andrade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Flávio da Silva Andrade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 3 (2017); 1007-1041 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2017); 1007-1041 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 3 (2017); 1007-1041 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 3 (2017); 1007-1041 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i3 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281939918553088 |