Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Flávio da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/172
Resumo: Based on knowledge coming from psychology, this essay seeks first to demonstrate how human beings, using heuristics, think and act to solve problems and make decisions in their day to day. Afterwards, the study seeks to reveal how heuristics are used in decision-making in criminal justice, commenting on the biases and the powers and perils of intuition, emphasizing that the judge should never dispense with rational and logical thinking, developed from the adversary proceeding. Therefore, it is pointed out the need for the judge to know the heuristics and biases of judgment, so that he seeks to make decisions in a more deliberative and less intuitive way, although there is a huge charge for speed in the current times.Finally, the need to provide and demand a multidisciplinary training of judges is reinforced.
id IBRASPP-1_58996bc2ff2f97ed4c5c4c3927361dee
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/172
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biasesA tomada da decisão judicial criminal à luz da psicologia: heurísticas e vieses cognitivosCriminal Procedure LawPsychologyIntersectionJudicial decision-makingHeuristicsBiasesMultidisciplinary training of judges.Direito Processual PenalPsicologiaInterseçãoTomada da decisão judicialHeurísticasViesesFormação multidisciplinar do juiz.Based on knowledge coming from psychology, this essay seeks first to demonstrate how human beings, using heuristics, think and act to solve problems and make decisions in their day to day. Afterwards, the study seeks to reveal how heuristics are used in decision-making in criminal justice, commenting on the biases and the powers and perils of intuition, emphasizing that the judge should never dispense with rational and logical thinking, developed from the adversary proceeding. Therefore, it is pointed out the need for the judge to know the heuristics and biases of judgment, so that he seeks to make decisions in a more deliberative and less intuitive way, although there is a huge charge for speed in the current times.Finally, the need to provide and demand a multidisciplinary training of judges is reinforced.A partir dos conhecimentos da psicologia, este ensaio procura primeiro demonstrar como o ser humano, valendo-se de heurísticas, pensa e age para resolver problemas e tomar decisões em seu dia a dia. Em seguida, o estudo busca revelar como as heurísticas são empregadas para a tomada da decisão judicial criminal, comentando-se sobre  os vieses e sobre os poderes e perigos da intuição, ressaltando-se que o juiz jamais deve prescindir do pensamento racional e lógico, desenvolvido a partir do contraditório. Portanto, chama-se a atenção para a necessidade de o juiz conhecer as heurísticas e os vieses de julgamento, de modo que busque tomar decisões de maneira mais deliberativa e menos intuitiva, ainda que haja uma enorme cobrança por celeridade nos tempos atuais. Reforça-se, ao final, a necessidade de se propiciar e exigir uma formação multidisciplinar do magistrado. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2019-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/17210.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.172Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019); 507-540Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019); 507-540Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 5 N. 1 (2019); 507-540Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 5 n. 1 (2019); 507-5402525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/172/162Copyright (c) 2019 Flávio da Silva Andradeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Flávio da Silva2020-07-20T07:42:33Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/172Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-07-20T07:42:33Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases
A tomada da decisão judicial criminal à luz da psicologia: heurísticas e vieses cognitivos
title Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases
spellingShingle Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases
Andrade, Flávio da Silva
Criminal Procedure Law
Psychology
Intersection
Judicial decision-making
Heuristics
Biases
Multidisciplinary training of judges.
Direito Processual Penal
Psicologia
Interseção
Tomada da decisão judicial
Heurísticas
Vieses
Formação multidisciplinar do juiz.
title_short Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases
title_full Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases
title_fullStr Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases
title_full_unstemmed Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases
title_sort Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases
author Andrade, Flávio da Silva
author_facet Andrade, Flávio da Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Flávio da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Criminal Procedure Law
Psychology
Intersection
Judicial decision-making
Heuristics
Biases
Multidisciplinary training of judges.
Direito Processual Penal
Psicologia
Interseção
Tomada da decisão judicial
Heurísticas
Vieses
Formação multidisciplinar do juiz.
topic Criminal Procedure Law
Psychology
Intersection
Judicial decision-making
Heuristics
Biases
Multidisciplinary training of judges.
Direito Processual Penal
Psicologia
Interseção
Tomada da decisão judicial
Heurísticas
Vieses
Formação multidisciplinar do juiz.
description Based on knowledge coming from psychology, this essay seeks first to demonstrate how human beings, using heuristics, think and act to solve problems and make decisions in their day to day. Afterwards, the study seeks to reveal how heuristics are used in decision-making in criminal justice, commenting on the biases and the powers and perils of intuition, emphasizing that the judge should never dispense with rational and logical thinking, developed from the adversary proceeding. Therefore, it is pointed out the need for the judge to know the heuristics and biases of judgment, so that he seeks to make decisions in a more deliberative and less intuitive way, although there is a huge charge for speed in the current times.Finally, the need to provide and demand a multidisciplinary training of judges is reinforced.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/172
10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.172
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/172
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.172
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/172/162
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Flávio da Silva Andrade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Flávio da Silva Andrade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019); 507-540
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019); 507-540
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 5 N. 1 (2019); 507-540
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 5 n. 1 (2019); 507-540
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281940004536320