Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/172 |
Resumo: | Based on knowledge coming from psychology, this essay seeks first to demonstrate how human beings, using heuristics, think and act to solve problems and make decisions in their day to day. Afterwards, the study seeks to reveal how heuristics are used in decision-making in criminal justice, commenting on the biases and the powers and perils of intuition, emphasizing that the judge should never dispense with rational and logical thinking, developed from the adversary proceeding. Therefore, it is pointed out the need for the judge to know the heuristics and biases of judgment, so that he seeks to make decisions in a more deliberative and less intuitive way, although there is a huge charge for speed in the current times.Finally, the need to provide and demand a multidisciplinary training of judges is reinforced. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_58996bc2ff2f97ed4c5c4c3927361dee |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/172 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biasesA tomada da decisão judicial criminal à luz da psicologia: heurísticas e vieses cognitivosCriminal Procedure LawPsychologyIntersectionJudicial decision-makingHeuristicsBiasesMultidisciplinary training of judges.Direito Processual PenalPsicologiaInterseçãoTomada da decisão judicialHeurísticasViesesFormação multidisciplinar do juiz.Based on knowledge coming from psychology, this essay seeks first to demonstrate how human beings, using heuristics, think and act to solve problems and make decisions in their day to day. Afterwards, the study seeks to reveal how heuristics are used in decision-making in criminal justice, commenting on the biases and the powers and perils of intuition, emphasizing that the judge should never dispense with rational and logical thinking, developed from the adversary proceeding. Therefore, it is pointed out the need for the judge to know the heuristics and biases of judgment, so that he seeks to make decisions in a more deliberative and less intuitive way, although there is a huge charge for speed in the current times.Finally, the need to provide and demand a multidisciplinary training of judges is reinforced.A partir dos conhecimentos da psicologia, este ensaio procura primeiro demonstrar como o ser humano, valendo-se de heurísticas, pensa e age para resolver problemas e tomar decisões em seu dia a dia. Em seguida, o estudo busca revelar como as heurísticas são empregadas para a tomada da decisão judicial criminal, comentando-se sobre os vieses e sobre os poderes e perigos da intuição, ressaltando-se que o juiz jamais deve prescindir do pensamento racional e lógico, desenvolvido a partir do contraditório. Portanto, chama-se a atenção para a necessidade de o juiz conhecer as heurísticas e os vieses de julgamento, de modo que busque tomar decisões de maneira mais deliberativa e menos intuitiva, ainda que haja uma enorme cobrança por celeridade nos tempos atuais. Reforça-se, ao final, a necessidade de se propiciar e exigir uma formação multidisciplinar do magistrado. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2019-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/17210.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.172Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019); 507-540Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019); 507-540Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 5 N. 1 (2019); 507-540Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 5 n. 1 (2019); 507-5402525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/172/162Copyright (c) 2019 Flávio da Silva Andradeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Flávio da Silva2020-07-20T07:42:33Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/172Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-07-20T07:42:33Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases A tomada da decisão judicial criminal à luz da psicologia: heurísticas e vieses cognitivos |
title |
Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases |
spellingShingle |
Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases Andrade, Flávio da Silva Criminal Procedure Law Psychology Intersection Judicial decision-making Heuristics Biases Multidisciplinary training of judges. Direito Processual Penal Psicologia Interseção Tomada da decisão judicial Heurísticas Vieses Formação multidisciplinar do juiz. |
title_short |
Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases |
title_full |
Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases |
title_fullStr |
Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases |
title_sort |
Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases |
author |
Andrade, Flávio da Silva |
author_facet |
Andrade, Flávio da Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Flávio da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Criminal Procedure Law Psychology Intersection Judicial decision-making Heuristics Biases Multidisciplinary training of judges. Direito Processual Penal Psicologia Interseção Tomada da decisão judicial Heurísticas Vieses Formação multidisciplinar do juiz. |
topic |
Criminal Procedure Law Psychology Intersection Judicial decision-making Heuristics Biases Multidisciplinary training of judges. Direito Processual Penal Psicologia Interseção Tomada da decisão judicial Heurísticas Vieses Formação multidisciplinar do juiz. |
description |
Based on knowledge coming from psychology, this essay seeks first to demonstrate how human beings, using heuristics, think and act to solve problems and make decisions in their day to day. Afterwards, the study seeks to reveal how heuristics are used in decision-making in criminal justice, commenting on the biases and the powers and perils of intuition, emphasizing that the judge should never dispense with rational and logical thinking, developed from the adversary proceeding. Therefore, it is pointed out the need for the judge to know the heuristics and biases of judgment, so that he seeks to make decisions in a more deliberative and less intuitive way, although there is a huge charge for speed in the current times.Finally, the need to provide and demand a multidisciplinary training of judges is reinforced. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/172 10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.172 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/172 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1.172 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/172/162 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Flávio da Silva Andrade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Flávio da Silva Andrade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019); 507-540 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019); 507-540 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 5 N. 1 (2019); 507-540 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 5 n. 1 (2019); 507-540 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v5i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281940004536320 |