The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Sarah
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329
Resumo: A “judge of guarantees” is a magistrate who acts only in the investigation phase, assessing the legality of the acts and deciding personal and real precautionary measures. Its adoption seeks to avoid psychological contamination of the magistrate, who will judge an eventual process. Introduced in Brazil by Law 13.964/2019, it is being challenged in four direct actions of unconstitutionality. In a preliminary decision, minister Fux accepted the intention to suspend the rules included in the Code of Criminal Procedure, for an indefinite period. Among them, art. 3º-D, which proposes the creation of a system of rotation of magistrates in the counties where only one judge works, as a solution to make the presence of the “judge of guarantees” feasible in the interior of the country. The central argument for this decision was the undue interference of the Legislative Power in the budgetary autonomy and self-management of the Judiciary, added, both to the high cost of hiring new magistrates, prosecutors, police officers and public defenders, as well as the routine expenses with daily physical displacement of these professionals. This article aims to present the adoption of the electronic police inquiry as a mitigation for the costs of implantation of the “judge of guarantees” in Brazil, neutralizing the discussion of the constitutionality of art. 3rd-D in the Federal Supreme Court.
id IBRASPP-1_69333e453af30619b93f508c15c1af70
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/329
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiryA introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônicopolice investigationjudge of guaranteespolice inquiryelectronic police inquiry.inquérito policialinvestigação policialjuiz das garantiasinquérito policial eletrônico.A “judge of guarantees” is a magistrate who acts only in the investigation phase, assessing the legality of the acts and deciding personal and real precautionary measures. Its adoption seeks to avoid psychological contamination of the magistrate, who will judge an eventual process. Introduced in Brazil by Law 13.964/2019, it is being challenged in four direct actions of unconstitutionality. In a preliminary decision, minister Fux accepted the intention to suspend the rules included in the Code of Criminal Procedure, for an indefinite period. Among them, art. 3º-D, which proposes the creation of a system of rotation of magistrates in the counties where only one judge works, as a solution to make the presence of the “judge of guarantees” feasible in the interior of the country. The central argument for this decision was the undue interference of the Legislative Power in the budgetary autonomy and self-management of the Judiciary, added, both to the high cost of hiring new magistrates, prosecutors, police officers and public defenders, as well as the routine expenses with daily physical displacement of these professionals. This article aims to present the adoption of the electronic police inquiry as a mitigation for the costs of implantation of the “judge of guarantees” in Brazil, neutralizing the discussion of the constitutionality of art. 3rd-D in the Federal Supreme Court.Considera-se “juiz das garantias” o magistrado que atua apenas na fase de investigação, avaliando a legalidade dos atos e decidindo medidas cautelares pessoais e reais. Sua adoção procura evitar a contaminação psicológica do magistrado que julgará eventual processo. Introduzido, no Brasil, pela Lei 13.964/2019, está sendo questionado em quatro ações diretas de inconstitucionalidade. Em decisão liminar, o ministro Fux acolheu a pretensão de suspensão das regras inseridas no Código de Processo Penal, por período indeterminado. Dentre elas, o art. 3º-D, que propõea criação de um sistema de rodízio de magistrados nas comarcas em que funcionar apenas um juiz, como solução para a viabilizar a presença do “juiz das garantias” no interior do país. O argumento central para essa decisão, foi a indevida ingerência do Poder Legislativo na autonomia orçamentária e de auto-gestão do Judiciário, somada, tanto ao elevado custo de contratação de novos magistrados, promotores, delegados e defensores públicos, quanto aos gastos rotineiros com diárias em deslocamentos físicos destes profissionais. O presente artigo visa a apresentar a adoção do inquérito policial eletrônico como atenuante para os custos de implantação do “juiz das garantias” no Brasil, neutralizando a discussão de constitucionalidade do art. 3º-D no Supremo Tribunal Federal. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/32910.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.329Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020); 147-174Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2020); 147-174Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 1 (2020); 147-174Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 1 (2020); 147-1742525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329/204https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329/264Copyright (c) 2020 Rodrigo Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Sarah Ribeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRégnier Chemim Guimarães, RodrigoRibeiro, Sarah2020-09-29T10:36:17Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/329Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-09-29T10:36:17Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry
A introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônico
title The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry
spellingShingle The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry
Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo
police investigation
judge of guarantees
police inquiry
electronic police inquiry.
inquérito policial
investigação policial
juiz das garantias
inquérito policial eletrônico.
title_short The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry
title_full The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry
title_fullStr The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry
title_full_unstemmed The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry
title_sort The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry
author Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo
author_facet Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo
Ribeiro, Sarah
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Sarah
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo
Ribeiro, Sarah
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv police investigation
judge of guarantees
police inquiry
electronic police inquiry.
inquérito policial
investigação policial
juiz das garantias
inquérito policial eletrônico.
topic police investigation
judge of guarantees
police inquiry
electronic police inquiry.
inquérito policial
investigação policial
juiz das garantias
inquérito policial eletrônico.
description A “judge of guarantees” is a magistrate who acts only in the investigation phase, assessing the legality of the acts and deciding personal and real precautionary measures. Its adoption seeks to avoid psychological contamination of the magistrate, who will judge an eventual process. Introduced in Brazil by Law 13.964/2019, it is being challenged in four direct actions of unconstitutionality. In a preliminary decision, minister Fux accepted the intention to suspend the rules included in the Code of Criminal Procedure, for an indefinite period. Among them, art. 3º-D, which proposes the creation of a system of rotation of magistrates in the counties where only one judge works, as a solution to make the presence of the “judge of guarantees” feasible in the interior of the country. The central argument for this decision was the undue interference of the Legislative Power in the budgetary autonomy and self-management of the Judiciary, added, both to the high cost of hiring new magistrates, prosecutors, police officers and public defenders, as well as the routine expenses with daily physical displacement of these professionals. This article aims to present the adoption of the electronic police inquiry as a mitigation for the costs of implantation of the “judge of guarantees” in Brazil, neutralizing the discussion of the constitutionality of art. 3rd-D in the Federal Supreme Court.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.329
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.329
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329/204
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329/264
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Rodrigo Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Sarah Ribeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Rodrigo Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Sarah Ribeiro
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020); 147-174
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2020); 147-174
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 1 (2020); 147-174
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 1 (2020); 147-174
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281940513095680