The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329 |
Resumo: | A “judge of guarantees” is a magistrate who acts only in the investigation phase, assessing the legality of the acts and deciding personal and real precautionary measures. Its adoption seeks to avoid psychological contamination of the magistrate, who will judge an eventual process. Introduced in Brazil by Law 13.964/2019, it is being challenged in four direct actions of unconstitutionality. In a preliminary decision, minister Fux accepted the intention to suspend the rules included in the Code of Criminal Procedure, for an indefinite period. Among them, art. 3º-D, which proposes the creation of a system of rotation of magistrates in the counties where only one judge works, as a solution to make the presence of the “judge of guarantees” feasible in the interior of the country. The central argument for this decision was the undue interference of the Legislative Power in the budgetary autonomy and self-management of the Judiciary, added, both to the high cost of hiring new magistrates, prosecutors, police officers and public defenders, as well as the routine expenses with daily physical displacement of these professionals. This article aims to present the adoption of the electronic police inquiry as a mitigation for the costs of implantation of the “judge of guarantees” in Brazil, neutralizing the discussion of the constitutionality of art. 3rd-D in the Federal Supreme Court. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_69333e453af30619b93f508c15c1af70 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/329 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiryA introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônicopolice investigationjudge of guaranteespolice inquiryelectronic police inquiry.inquérito policialinvestigação policialjuiz das garantiasinquérito policial eletrônico.A “judge of guarantees” is a magistrate who acts only in the investigation phase, assessing the legality of the acts and deciding personal and real precautionary measures. Its adoption seeks to avoid psychological contamination of the magistrate, who will judge an eventual process. Introduced in Brazil by Law 13.964/2019, it is being challenged in four direct actions of unconstitutionality. In a preliminary decision, minister Fux accepted the intention to suspend the rules included in the Code of Criminal Procedure, for an indefinite period. Among them, art. 3º-D, which proposes the creation of a system of rotation of magistrates in the counties where only one judge works, as a solution to make the presence of the “judge of guarantees” feasible in the interior of the country. The central argument for this decision was the undue interference of the Legislative Power in the budgetary autonomy and self-management of the Judiciary, added, both to the high cost of hiring new magistrates, prosecutors, police officers and public defenders, as well as the routine expenses with daily physical displacement of these professionals. This article aims to present the adoption of the electronic police inquiry as a mitigation for the costs of implantation of the “judge of guarantees” in Brazil, neutralizing the discussion of the constitutionality of art. 3rd-D in the Federal Supreme Court.Considera-se “juiz das garantias” o magistrado que atua apenas na fase de investigação, avaliando a legalidade dos atos e decidindo medidas cautelares pessoais e reais. Sua adoção procura evitar a contaminação psicológica do magistrado que julgará eventual processo. Introduzido, no Brasil, pela Lei 13.964/2019, está sendo questionado em quatro ações diretas de inconstitucionalidade. Em decisão liminar, o ministro Fux acolheu a pretensão de suspensão das regras inseridas no Código de Processo Penal, por período indeterminado. Dentre elas, o art. 3º-D, que propõea criação de um sistema de rodízio de magistrados nas comarcas em que funcionar apenas um juiz, como solução para a viabilizar a presença do “juiz das garantias” no interior do país. O argumento central para essa decisão, foi a indevida ingerência do Poder Legislativo na autonomia orçamentária e de auto-gestão do Judiciário, somada, tanto ao elevado custo de contratação de novos magistrados, promotores, delegados e defensores públicos, quanto aos gastos rotineiros com diárias em deslocamentos físicos destes profissionais. O presente artigo visa a apresentar a adoção do inquérito policial eletrônico como atenuante para os custos de implantação do “juiz das garantias” no Brasil, neutralizando a discussão de constitucionalidade do art. 3º-D no Supremo Tribunal Federal. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2020-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/32910.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.329Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020); 147-174Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2020); 147-174Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 1 (2020); 147-174Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 1 (2020); 147-1742525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329/204https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329/264Copyright (c) 2020 Rodrigo Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Sarah Ribeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRégnier Chemim Guimarães, RodrigoRibeiro, Sarah2020-09-29T10:36:17Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/329Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-09-29T10:36:17Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry A introdução do juiz das garantias no Brasil e o inquérito policial eletrônico |
title |
The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry |
spellingShingle |
The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo police investigation judge of guarantees police inquiry electronic police inquiry. inquérito policial investigação policial juiz das garantias inquérito policial eletrônico. |
title_short |
The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry |
title_full |
The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry |
title_fullStr |
The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry |
title_full_unstemmed |
The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry |
title_sort |
The introduction of the guarantee judge in Brazil and the electronic police inquiry |
author |
Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo |
author_facet |
Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo Ribeiro, Sarah |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ribeiro, Sarah |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Rodrigo Ribeiro, Sarah |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
police investigation judge of guarantees police inquiry electronic police inquiry. inquérito policial investigação policial juiz das garantias inquérito policial eletrônico. |
topic |
police investigation judge of guarantees police inquiry electronic police inquiry. inquérito policial investigação policial juiz das garantias inquérito policial eletrônico. |
description |
A “judge of guarantees” is a magistrate who acts only in the investigation phase, assessing the legality of the acts and deciding personal and real precautionary measures. Its adoption seeks to avoid psychological contamination of the magistrate, who will judge an eventual process. Introduced in Brazil by Law 13.964/2019, it is being challenged in four direct actions of unconstitutionality. In a preliminary decision, minister Fux accepted the intention to suspend the rules included in the Code of Criminal Procedure, for an indefinite period. Among them, art. 3º-D, which proposes the creation of a system of rotation of magistrates in the counties where only one judge works, as a solution to make the presence of the “judge of guarantees” feasible in the interior of the country. The central argument for this decision was the undue interference of the Legislative Power in the budgetary autonomy and self-management of the Judiciary, added, both to the high cost of hiring new magistrates, prosecutors, police officers and public defenders, as well as the routine expenses with daily physical displacement of these professionals. This article aims to present the adoption of the electronic police inquiry as a mitigation for the costs of implantation of the “judge of guarantees” in Brazil, neutralizing the discussion of the constitutionality of art. 3rd-D in the Federal Supreme Court. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.329 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1.329 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329/204 https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/329/264 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Rodrigo Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Sarah Ribeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Rodrigo Régnier Chemim Guimarães, Sarah Ribeiro |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020); 147-174 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2020); 147-174 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 6 N. 1 (2020); 147-174 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 6 n. 1 (2020); 147-174 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v6i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281940513095680 |