A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/131
Resumo: The article aims to address the multiple faces that the presumption of innocence incorporates in modern legal systems from a critical perspective. In this sense, an analytical methodology seeks to demonstrate that some of these faces overlap with other legal rights and institutes, which, far from increasing the guarantees of citizens, leads to confusion and lack of controllability of judicial decisions. Thus, it is defended the conceptual and practical convenience of thinking the presumption of innocence avoiding overlaps with other legal rights or concepts, as standards of proof or burden of proof rules. Hence the reference to a minimalist and guarantistic conception of the presumption of innocence and, and, as will be seen, the defense of the presumption of innocence as a second order rule whose application would make sense in contexts of uncertainty about the satisfaction of the standard of proof.
id IBRASPP-1_724235de2e4d4f54c977dbd2d1c55588
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/131
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of InnocenceUma concepção minimalista e garantista da presunção de inocênciaPresumption of innocenceconceptual minimaliststandards of proofsecond order rulecontext of doubt.Presunção de inocênciaminimalismo conceitualstandards de provaregra de segunda ordemcontexto de dúvida.The article aims to address the multiple faces that the presumption of innocence incorporates in modern legal systems from a critical perspective. In this sense, an analytical methodology seeks to demonstrate that some of these faces overlap with other legal rights and institutes, which, far from increasing the guarantees of citizens, leads to confusion and lack of controllability of judicial decisions. Thus, it is defended the conceptual and practical convenience of thinking the presumption of innocence avoiding overlaps with other legal rights or concepts, as standards of proof or burden of proof rules. Hence the reference to a minimalist and guarantistic conception of the presumption of innocence and, and, as will be seen, the defense of the presumption of innocence as a second order rule whose application would make sense in contexts of uncertainty about the satisfaction of the standard of proof.O artigo visa abordar as múltiplas facetas que a presunção de inocência incorpora nos modernos sistemas jurídicos desde uma perspectiva crítica. Neste sentido, a partir de uma metodologia analítica busca-se demonstrar que algumas dessas facetas se sobrepõem a outros direitos e institutos jurídicos o que, finalmente, longe de aumentar as garantias dos cidadãos, chega a produzir confusão e falta de controlabilidade das decisões judiciais. Assim, defende-se a conveniência conceitual e prática de se pensar a presunção de inocência evitando sobreposições com outros direitos ou conceitos jurídicos; como standards de prova ou ônus da prova. Daí a referência a uma concepção minimalista e garantista da presunção de inocência e, como será possível ver, a defesa da presunção de inocência como uma regra de segunda ordem cuja aplicação cobraria sentido em contextos de incerteza sobre a satisfação do standard de prova. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2018-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/13110.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.131Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018); 149-182Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2018); 149-182Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 1 (2018); 149-182Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 1 (2018); 149-1822525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/131/113Copyright (c) 2017 Jordi Ferrer Beltráninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerrer Beltrán, Jordi2018-03-07T14:29:56Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/131Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2018-03-07T14:29:56Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence
Uma concepção minimalista e garantista da presunção de inocência
title A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence
spellingShingle A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence
Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi
Presumption of innocence
conceptual minimalist
standards of proof
second order rule
context of doubt.
Presunção de inocência
minimalismo conceitual
standards de prova
regra de segunda ordem
contexto de dúvida.
title_short A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence
title_full A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence
title_fullStr A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence
title_full_unstemmed A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence
title_sort A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence
author Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi
author_facet Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Presumption of innocence
conceptual minimalist
standards of proof
second order rule
context of doubt.
Presunção de inocência
minimalismo conceitual
standards de prova
regra de segunda ordem
contexto de dúvida.
topic Presumption of innocence
conceptual minimalist
standards of proof
second order rule
context of doubt.
Presunção de inocência
minimalismo conceitual
standards de prova
regra de segunda ordem
contexto de dúvida.
description The article aims to address the multiple faces that the presumption of innocence incorporates in modern legal systems from a critical perspective. In this sense, an analytical methodology seeks to demonstrate that some of these faces overlap with other legal rights and institutes, which, far from increasing the guarantees of citizens, leads to confusion and lack of controllability of judicial decisions. Thus, it is defended the conceptual and practical convenience of thinking the presumption of innocence avoiding overlaps with other legal rights or concepts, as standards of proof or burden of proof rules. Hence the reference to a minimalist and guarantistic conception of the presumption of innocence and, and, as will be seen, the defense of the presumption of innocence as a second order rule whose application would make sense in contexts of uncertainty about the satisfaction of the standard of proof.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/131
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.131
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/131
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.131
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/131/113
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Jordi Ferrer Beltrán
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Jordi Ferrer Beltrán
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018); 149-182
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2018); 149-182
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 1 (2018); 149-182
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 1 (2018); 149-182
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281939964690432