A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/131 |
Resumo: | The article aims to address the multiple faces that the presumption of innocence incorporates in modern legal systems from a critical perspective. In this sense, an analytical methodology seeks to demonstrate that some of these faces overlap with other legal rights and institutes, which, far from increasing the guarantees of citizens, leads to confusion and lack of controllability of judicial decisions. Thus, it is defended the conceptual and practical convenience of thinking the presumption of innocence avoiding overlaps with other legal rights or concepts, as standards of proof or burden of proof rules. Hence the reference to a minimalist and guarantistic conception of the presumption of innocence and, and, as will be seen, the defense of the presumption of innocence as a second order rule whose application would make sense in contexts of uncertainty about the satisfaction of the standard of proof. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_724235de2e4d4f54c977dbd2d1c55588 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/131 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of InnocenceUma concepção minimalista e garantista da presunção de inocênciaPresumption of innocenceconceptual minimaliststandards of proofsecond order rulecontext of doubt.Presunção de inocênciaminimalismo conceitualstandards de provaregra de segunda ordemcontexto de dúvida.The article aims to address the multiple faces that the presumption of innocence incorporates in modern legal systems from a critical perspective. In this sense, an analytical methodology seeks to demonstrate that some of these faces overlap with other legal rights and institutes, which, far from increasing the guarantees of citizens, leads to confusion and lack of controllability of judicial decisions. Thus, it is defended the conceptual and practical convenience of thinking the presumption of innocence avoiding overlaps with other legal rights or concepts, as standards of proof or burden of proof rules. Hence the reference to a minimalist and guarantistic conception of the presumption of innocence and, and, as will be seen, the defense of the presumption of innocence as a second order rule whose application would make sense in contexts of uncertainty about the satisfaction of the standard of proof.O artigo visa abordar as múltiplas facetas que a presunção de inocência incorpora nos modernos sistemas jurídicos desde uma perspectiva crítica. Neste sentido, a partir de uma metodologia analítica busca-se demonstrar que algumas dessas facetas se sobrepõem a outros direitos e institutos jurídicos o que, finalmente, longe de aumentar as garantias dos cidadãos, chega a produzir confusão e falta de controlabilidade das decisões judiciais. Assim, defende-se a conveniência conceitual e prática de se pensar a presunção de inocência evitando sobreposições com outros direitos ou conceitos jurídicos; como standards de prova ou ônus da prova. Daí a referência a uma concepção minimalista e garantista da presunção de inocência e, como será possível ver, a defesa da presunção de inocência como uma regra de segunda ordem cuja aplicação cobraria sentido em contextos de incerteza sobre a satisfação do standard de prova. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2018-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/13110.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.131Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018); 149-182Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2018); 149-182Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 1 (2018); 149-182Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 1 (2018); 149-1822525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/131/113Copyright (c) 2017 Jordi Ferrer Beltráninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerrer Beltrán, Jordi2018-03-07T14:29:56Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/131Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2018-03-07T14:29:56Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence Uma concepção minimalista e garantista da presunção de inocência |
title |
A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence |
spellingShingle |
A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi Presumption of innocence conceptual minimalist standards of proof second order rule context of doubt. Presunção de inocência minimalismo conceitual standards de prova regra de segunda ordem contexto de dúvida. |
title_short |
A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence |
title_full |
A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence |
title_fullStr |
A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence |
title_sort |
A Minimalist and Garantistic Conception of the Presumption of Innocence |
author |
Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi |
author_facet |
Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferrer Beltrán, Jordi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Presumption of innocence conceptual minimalist standards of proof second order rule context of doubt. Presunção de inocência minimalismo conceitual standards de prova regra de segunda ordem contexto de dúvida. |
topic |
Presumption of innocence conceptual minimalist standards of proof second order rule context of doubt. Presunção de inocência minimalismo conceitual standards de prova regra de segunda ordem contexto de dúvida. |
description |
The article aims to address the multiple faces that the presumption of innocence incorporates in modern legal systems from a critical perspective. In this sense, an analytical methodology seeks to demonstrate that some of these faces overlap with other legal rights and institutes, which, far from increasing the guarantees of citizens, leads to confusion and lack of controllability of judicial decisions. Thus, it is defended the conceptual and practical convenience of thinking the presumption of innocence avoiding overlaps with other legal rights or concepts, as standards of proof or burden of proof rules. Hence the reference to a minimalist and guarantistic conception of the presumption of innocence and, and, as will be seen, the defense of the presumption of innocence as a second order rule whose application would make sense in contexts of uncertainty about the satisfaction of the standard of proof. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/131 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.131 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/131 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.131 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/131/113 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Jordi Ferrer Beltrán info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Jordi Ferrer Beltrán |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018); 149-182 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2018); 149-182 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 4 N. 1 (2018); 149-182 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 4 n. 1 (2018); 149-182 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281939964690432 |