Virtual oral hearings: a comparative analysis in the search for standards for Latin American criminal justice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonzalez Postigo, Leonel
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/993
Resumo: The use of videoconferencing in criminal proceedings, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, put a strain on the materialization of the principles that inform due process. Justice systems had to adapt quickly to continue to provide justice services in cases deemed urgent. Then, due to the duration of the pandemic, they had to adopt new measures to continue handling cases. Once the health crisis and states of calamity were overcome, the justice systems continued with the use of videoconferencing and issued new rules for its use. However, it has been detected that these norms are applied in a discretionary manner by the courts and there is no clarity on the criteria for the use of videoconferencing. This study analyzes three representative Latin American countries and extracts information to address four questions: (1) how did the criminal justice systems react to the COVID-19 contingency?; (2) what were the discussions of the principles of immediacy, contradiction and publicity?; (3) how is virtuality currently regulated?; and (4) what criteria could guide its use?
id IBRASPP-1_7f490c3d8ccb57c3f56f4c85f225017d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/993
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Virtual oral hearings: a comparative analysis in the search for standards for Latin American criminal justiceLas audiencias orales en formato virtual: un análisis comparado en la búsqueda de estándares para la justicia penal latinoamericanaAs audiências orais em formato virtual: uma análise comparada em busca de parâmetros para a justiça penal latinoamericanaoral hearings; videoconference; due process; immediacy.audiencias orales; videoconferencia; debido proceso; inmediaciónThe use of videoconferencing in criminal proceedings, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, put a strain on the materialization of the principles that inform due process. Justice systems had to adapt quickly to continue to provide justice services in cases deemed urgent. Then, due to the duration of the pandemic, they had to adopt new measures to continue handling cases. Once the health crisis and states of calamity were overcome, the justice systems continued with the use of videoconferencing and issued new rules for its use. However, it has been detected that these norms are applied in a discretionary manner by the courts and there is no clarity on the criteria for the use of videoconferencing. This study analyzes three representative Latin American countries and extracts information to address four questions: (1) how did the criminal justice systems react to the COVID-19 contingency?; (2) what were the discussions of the principles of immediacy, contradiction and publicity?; (3) how is virtuality currently regulated?; and (4) what criteria could guide its use?El uso de la videoconferencia en el proceso penal, en el marco de la pandemia por COVID-19, puso en tensión la materialización de los principios que informan el debido proceso. Los sistemas de justicia debieron adaptarse rápidamente para seguir brindando los servicios de justicia en aquellas causas consideradas urgentes. Luego, y en virtud de la duración de la pandemia, debieron adoptar nuevas medidas que permitieran seguir con el conocimiento de casos. Una vez terminada la crisis sanitaria y los estados de calamidad decretados, los sistemas de justicia continuaron con el uso de la videoconferencia y dictaron nuevas normas para su utilización. Sin embargo, se ha detectado que estas normas se aplican de un modo discrecional por parte de los tribunales y no existe claridad sobre los criterios para el uso de la videoconferencia. Este estudio realiza un análisis de tres países representativos de América Latina y extrae información que permite abordar cuatro interrogantes: (1) ¿cómo reaccionaron los sistemas de justicia penal ante la contingencia del COVID-19?; (2) ¿qué discusiones se dieron alrededor de los principios de inmediación, contradicción y publicidad?; (3) ¿cómo está regulada actualmente la virtualidad?; y (4) ¿qué criterios podrían orientar su uso?El uso de la videoconferencia en el proceso penal, en el marco de la pandemia por COVID-19, puso en tensión la materialización de los principios que informan el debido proceso. Los sistemas de justicia debieron adaptarse rápidamente para seguir brindando los servicios de justicia en aquellas causas consideradas urgentes. Luego, y en virtud de la duración de la pandemia, debieron adoptar nuevas medidas que permitieran seguir con el conocimiento de casos. Una vez terminada la crisis sanitaria y los estados de calamidad decretados, los sistemas de justicia continuaron con el uso de la videoconferencia y dictaron nuevas normas para su utilización. Sin embargo, se ha detectado que estas normas se aplican de un modo discrecional por parte de los tribunales y no existe claridad sobre los criterios para el uso de la videoconferencia. Este estudio realiza un análisis de tres países representativos de América Latina y extrae información que permite abordar cuatro interrogantes: (1) ¿cómo reaccionaron los sistemas de justicia penal ante la contingencia del COVID-19?; (2) ¿qué discusiones se dieron alrededor de los principios de inmediación, contradicción y publicidad?; (3) ¿cómo está regulada actualmente la virtualidad?; y (4) ¿qué criterios podrían orientar su uso?Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2024-07-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/99310.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.993Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2024)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 10 N. 2 (2024)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 10 n. 2 (2024)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPspahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/993/536Copyright (c) 2024 Leonel Gonzalez Postigohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonzalez Postigo, LeonelGonzalez Postigo, Leonel2024-07-29T11:22:26Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/993Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2024-07-29T11:22:26Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Virtual oral hearings: a comparative analysis in the search for standards for Latin American criminal justice
Las audiencias orales en formato virtual: un análisis comparado en la búsqueda de estándares para la justicia penal latinoamericana
As audiências orais em formato virtual: uma análise comparada em busca de parâmetros para a justiça penal latinoamericana
title Virtual oral hearings: a comparative analysis in the search for standards for Latin American criminal justice
spellingShingle Virtual oral hearings: a comparative analysis in the search for standards for Latin American criminal justice
Gonzalez Postigo, Leonel
oral hearings; videoconference; due process; immediacy.
audiencias orales; videoconferencia; debido proceso; inmediación
title_short Virtual oral hearings: a comparative analysis in the search for standards for Latin American criminal justice
title_full Virtual oral hearings: a comparative analysis in the search for standards for Latin American criminal justice
title_fullStr Virtual oral hearings: a comparative analysis in the search for standards for Latin American criminal justice
title_full_unstemmed Virtual oral hearings: a comparative analysis in the search for standards for Latin American criminal justice
title_sort Virtual oral hearings: a comparative analysis in the search for standards for Latin American criminal justice
author Gonzalez Postigo, Leonel
author_facet Gonzalez Postigo, Leonel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonzalez Postigo, Leonel
Gonzalez Postigo, Leonel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv oral hearings; videoconference; due process; immediacy.
audiencias orales; videoconferencia; debido proceso; inmediación
topic oral hearings; videoconference; due process; immediacy.
audiencias orales; videoconferencia; debido proceso; inmediación
description The use of videoconferencing in criminal proceedings, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, put a strain on the materialization of the principles that inform due process. Justice systems had to adapt quickly to continue to provide justice services in cases deemed urgent. Then, due to the duration of the pandemic, they had to adopt new measures to continue handling cases. Once the health crisis and states of calamity were overcome, the justice systems continued with the use of videoconferencing and issued new rules for its use. However, it has been detected that these norms are applied in a discretionary manner by the courts and there is no clarity on the criteria for the use of videoconferencing. This study analyzes three representative Latin American countries and extracts information to address four questions: (1) how did the criminal justice systems react to the COVID-19 contingency?; (2) what were the discussions of the principles of immediacy, contradiction and publicity?; (3) how is virtuality currently regulated?; and (4) what criteria could guide its use?
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/993
10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.993
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/993
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.993
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/993/536
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Leonel Gonzalez Postigo
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Leonel Gonzalez Postigo
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2024)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 10 N. 2 (2024)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 10 n. 2 (2024)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281941838495744