Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49 |
Resumo: | This article analyzes the possibility of an unilateral plea bargain, not depending on a previous agreement with the prosecution. From the comparative study between the American and Italian bargained criminal justice and the one practiced in Brazil, it reveals the acceptance of this type of cooperation, according to the nature of the benefits involved, as a natural and inevitable consequence of the constitutional principles that guide Brazilian Criminal Procedure Law. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_acb67f229c940c5e955e2436ed447534 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/49 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelinesColaboração unilateral premiada como consectário lógico das balizas constitucionais do devido processo legal brasileiroUnilateral plea bargainJudicial controlProsecution.Colaboração Premiada UnilateralControle jurisdicionalMinistério Público.This article analyzes the possibility of an unilateral plea bargain, not depending on a previous agreement with the prosecution. From the comparative study between the American and Italian bargained criminal justice and the one practiced in Brazil, it reveals the acceptance of this type of cooperation, according to the nature of the benefits involved, as a natural and inevitable consequence of the constitutional principles that guide Brazilian Criminal Procedure Law.O artigo objetiva assentar a possibilidade da colaboração premiada unilateral, independentemente de acordo prévio com o Ministério Público. A partir do contraponto entre os modelos norte-americano e italiano de justiça penal negocial e o praticado no Brasil, demonstrar-se-á que a aceitação dessa modalidade de cooperação, considerada a natureza dos benefícios previstos em lei, é decorrência natural e inafastável dos princípios constitucionais informativos do ordenamento processual penal brasileiro.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2017-03-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/4910.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.49Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017); 131-166Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017); 131-166Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 1 (2017); 131-166Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 1 (2017); 131-1662525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49/55Copyright (c) 2017 Marcos Paulo Dutra Santosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Marcos Paulo Dutra2017-06-08T17:40:58Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/49Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2017-06-08T17:40:58Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines Colaboração unilateral premiada como consectário lógico das balizas constitucionais do devido processo legal brasileiro |
title |
Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines |
spellingShingle |
Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines Santos, Marcos Paulo Dutra Unilateral plea bargain Judicial control Prosecution. Colaboração Premiada Unilateral Controle jurisdicional Ministério Público. |
title_short |
Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines |
title_full |
Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines |
title_fullStr |
Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed |
Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines |
title_sort |
Unilateral plea bargain as a logical result of the Brazilian due process’s constitucional guidelines |
author |
Santos, Marcos Paulo Dutra |
author_facet |
Santos, Marcos Paulo Dutra |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Marcos Paulo Dutra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Unilateral plea bargain Judicial control Prosecution. Colaboração Premiada Unilateral Controle jurisdicional Ministério Público. |
topic |
Unilateral plea bargain Judicial control Prosecution. Colaboração Premiada Unilateral Controle jurisdicional Ministério Público. |
description |
This article analyzes the possibility of an unilateral plea bargain, not depending on a previous agreement with the prosecution. From the comparative study between the American and Italian bargained criminal justice and the one practiced in Brazil, it reveals the acceptance of this type of cooperation, according to the nature of the benefits involved, as a natural and inevitable consequence of the constitutional principles that guide Brazilian Criminal Procedure Law. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.49 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.49 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49/55 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Marcos Paulo Dutra Santos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Marcos Paulo Dutra Santos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017); 131-166 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 1 (2017); 131-166 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 1 (2017); 131-166 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 1 (2017); 131-166 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281939882901504 |