Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vera Sánchez, Juan Sebastián
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/498
Resumo: In this paper we analyze the exclusion criteria of scientific expert evidence of low epistemic reliability from two different legal cultures: common law and civil law. We develop the relationship between both groups of criteria to argue that the Daubert criteria may be applicable in civil law when dealing with clear cases. The freedom of proof, the right to evidence and due process are limitations that prevent a broad application of the exclusion of evidence in these cases.
id IBRASPP-1_b3efd813480c455c30c0030b16f07170
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/498
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal culturesExclusión de la prueba pericial científica (de baja calidad epistémica) en fase de admisibilidad en procesos penales de tradición románica-continental: Diálogo entre dos culturas jurídicasDaubert decisionexpert evidenceexclusionary rules.Fallo Daubertprueba pericialreglas de exclusión.In this paper we analyze the exclusion criteria of scientific expert evidence of low epistemic reliability from two different legal cultures: common law and civil law. We develop the relationship between both groups of criteria to argue that the Daubert criteria may be applicable in civil law when dealing with clear cases. The freedom of proof, the right to evidence and due process are limitations that prevent a broad application of the exclusion of evidence in these cases.En este trabajo analizamos los criterios de exclusión de la prueba pericial científica de baja fiabilidad epistémica proveniente de dos culturas jurídicas diversas: common law y civil law.  Se desarrolla la relación entre ambos grupos de criterios para afirmar que los criterios Daubert pueden ser aplicables en los sistemas de enjuiciamiento del civil lawcuando se trate de casos claros. La libertad de incorporación de medios de prueba, el derecho a la prueba y el debido proceso son limitaciones que impiden una aplicación amplia de la exclusión probatoria en estos casos.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2021-03-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/49810.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.498Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021); 375Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2021); 375Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 1 (2021); 375Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 1 (2021); 3752525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPspahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/498/334https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/498/355Copyright (c) 2021 Juan Sebastián Vera Sánchezinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVera Sánchez, Juan Sebastián2021-04-19T07:02:53Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/498Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2021-04-19T07:02:53Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures
Exclusión de la prueba pericial científica (de baja calidad epistémica) en fase de admisibilidad en procesos penales de tradición románica-continental: Diálogo entre dos culturas jurídicas
title Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures
spellingShingle Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures
Vera Sánchez, Juan Sebastián
Daubert decision
expert evidence
exclusionary rules.
Fallo Daubert
prueba pericial
reglas de exclusión.
title_short Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures
title_full Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures
title_fullStr Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures
title_full_unstemmed Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures
title_sort Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures
author Vera Sánchez, Juan Sebastián
author_facet Vera Sánchez, Juan Sebastián
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vera Sánchez, Juan Sebastián
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Daubert decision
expert evidence
exclusionary rules.
Fallo Daubert
prueba pericial
reglas de exclusión.
topic Daubert decision
expert evidence
exclusionary rules.
Fallo Daubert
prueba pericial
reglas de exclusión.
description In this paper we analyze the exclusion criteria of scientific expert evidence of low epistemic reliability from two different legal cultures: common law and civil law. We develop the relationship between both groups of criteria to argue that the Daubert criteria may be applicable in civil law when dealing with clear cases. The freedom of proof, the right to evidence and due process are limitations that prevent a broad application of the exclusion of evidence in these cases.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/498
10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.498
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/498
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.498
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/498/334
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/498/355
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Juan Sebastián Vera Sánchez
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Juan Sebastián Vera Sánchez
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021); 375
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2021); 375
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 1 (2021); 375
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 1 (2021); 375
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281941088763904

Registros relacionados