Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425 |
Resumo: | The article’s question is about how provisional measures are applied in encounters between legal actors and homeless people in custody hearings, based on the procedural of debating and deciding. Data collection took place at the Núcleo de Prisão em Flagrante e Audiências de Custódia in Salvador, in two periods of the year 2018, to understand the meanings conferred by judges, prosecutors and defenders regarding provisional measures in kind. Among the observation of hearings with 69 in custody, the research had as an operational sample cases of 19 people living on the streets. In relation to these, a documentary analysis was also carried out of the 19 flagrant arrest records and 52 past cases, including criminal actions and flagrant arrest records, which were recorded as criminal records. Expanding the analysis beyond the mere absence or insufficiency of reasoning in the decisions and analyzing the “paredão” technique as an informal hearing procedure, the hidden features that have been attributed to the provisional measures were analyzed, in each context of punitive demand, along the logic of “perspective prison”. The work concludes that the measures considered as alternatives, in addition to not being discussed under the legal criteria, exercise a punitive anticipation function and are inserted in the urban socio-racial management, presenting deeper connections with the pre-trial prison, which is maintained in its horizon. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_cab6c277a6062271f38172cf1bb8ba59 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/425 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests.A aplicação de medidas cautelares pessoais em audiências de custódia: um olhar a partir da prisão em flagrante de pessoas em situação de ruaProvisional MeasuresCustody HearingsHomeless peopleJudicial procedure.Medidas cautelares diversas da prisãoAudiência de custódiaPessoas em situação de ruaatuação judicial.The article’s question is about how provisional measures are applied in encounters between legal actors and homeless people in custody hearings, based on the procedural of debating and deciding. Data collection took place at the Núcleo de Prisão em Flagrante e Audiências de Custódia in Salvador, in two periods of the year 2018, to understand the meanings conferred by judges, prosecutors and defenders regarding provisional measures in kind. Among the observation of hearings with 69 in custody, the research had as an operational sample cases of 19 people living on the streets. In relation to these, a documentary analysis was also carried out of the 19 flagrant arrest records and 52 past cases, including criminal actions and flagrant arrest records, which were recorded as criminal records. Expanding the analysis beyond the mere absence or insufficiency of reasoning in the decisions and analyzing the “paredão” technique as an informal hearing procedure, the hidden features that have been attributed to the provisional measures were analyzed, in each context of punitive demand, along the logic of “perspective prison”. The work concludes that the measures considered as alternatives, in addition to not being discussed under the legal criteria, exercise a punitive anticipation function and are inserted in the urban socio-racial management, presenting deeper connections with the pre-trial prison, which is maintained in its horizon.O artigo partiu da pergunta: como ocorre a aplicação de medidas cautelares pessoais nos encontros presenciais entre atores jurídicos e pessoas em situação de rua em audiências de custódia? Realizou-se pesquisa de campo no Núcleo de Prisão em Flagrante e Audiências de Custódia de Salvador, em dois períodos do ano de 2018, coletando dados em distintos contextos de demanda por ordem na cidade, para entender os sentidos conferidos por juízes, promotores e defensores em relação às medidas cautelares em espécie. Dentre a observação de audiências com 69 custodiados, a pesquisa teve como amostra operacional casos de 19 pessoas em situação de rua. Em relação a estes, também foi realizada análise documental dos 19 autos de prisão em flagrante e 52 processos pretéritos, entre ações penais e autos de prisão em flagrante, que constavam como registros criminais. Expandindo a análise para além da mera ausência ou insuficiência de fundamentação nas decisões e analisando a técnica do “paredão” como procedimento informal de audiência, problematizou-se as funções não declaradas que vêm sendo atribuídas às medidas cautelares, a depender do contexto de demanda punitiva, e a conformação da lógica da “prisão a médio prazo”. O trabalho conclui que as medidas tidas como alternativas, além de não serem debatidas sob os critérios legais de cautelaridade, exercem uma função de antecipação punitiva e se inserem na gestão sociorracial urbana, apresentando conexões mais profundas com a prisão preventiva, que é mantida em seu horizonte.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2021-03-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/42510.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.425Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021); 611Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2021); 611Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 1 (2021); 611Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 1 (2021); 6112525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425/341https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425/362Copyright (c) 2021 Vinícius de Assis Romãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRomão, Vinícius de Assis2021-05-03T10:30:48Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/425Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2021-05-03T10:30:48Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests. A aplicação de medidas cautelares pessoais em audiências de custódia: um olhar a partir da prisão em flagrante de pessoas em situação de rua |
title |
Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests. |
spellingShingle |
Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests. Romão, Vinícius de Assis Provisional Measures Custody Hearings Homeless people Judicial procedure. Medidas cautelares diversas da prisão Audiência de custódia Pessoas em situação de rua atuação judicial. |
title_short |
Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests. |
title_full |
Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests. |
title_fullStr |
Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests. |
title_sort |
Provisional measures’ application in custody hearings: a study based on homeless people’ arrests. |
author |
Romão, Vinícius de Assis |
author_facet |
Romão, Vinícius de Assis |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Romão, Vinícius de Assis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Provisional Measures Custody Hearings Homeless people Judicial procedure. Medidas cautelares diversas da prisão Audiência de custódia Pessoas em situação de rua atuação judicial. |
topic |
Provisional Measures Custody Hearings Homeless people Judicial procedure. Medidas cautelares diversas da prisão Audiência de custódia Pessoas em situação de rua atuação judicial. |
description |
The article’s question is about how provisional measures are applied in encounters between legal actors and homeless people in custody hearings, based on the procedural of debating and deciding. Data collection took place at the Núcleo de Prisão em Flagrante e Audiências de Custódia in Salvador, in two periods of the year 2018, to understand the meanings conferred by judges, prosecutors and defenders regarding provisional measures in kind. Among the observation of hearings with 69 in custody, the research had as an operational sample cases of 19 people living on the streets. In relation to these, a documentary analysis was also carried out of the 19 flagrant arrest records and 52 past cases, including criminal actions and flagrant arrest records, which were recorded as criminal records. Expanding the analysis beyond the mere absence or insufficiency of reasoning in the decisions and analyzing the “paredão” technique as an informal hearing procedure, the hidden features that have been attributed to the provisional measures were analyzed, in each context of punitive demand, along the logic of “perspective prison”. The work concludes that the measures considered as alternatives, in addition to not being discussed under the legal criteria, exercise a punitive anticipation function and are inserted in the urban socio-racial management, presenting deeper connections with the pre-trial prison, which is maintained in its horizon. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425 10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.425 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.425 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425/341 https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/425/362 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Vinícius de Assis Romão info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Vinícius de Assis Romão |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021); 611 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2021); 611 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 1 (2021); 611 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 1 (2021); 611 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281941046820864 |