Editorial: Peer review and the reviewer’s role – principles and alignments to an effective review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/70 |
Resumo: | Continuing with the analysis of the phases and roles of the scientific editorial process’ actors, this editorial intends to explore the fundamental characteristics of "peer review" and, consequently, of the reviewer in the production of knowledge in scientific journals. Thus, it is intended to analyze the position and role of the reviewer in the scientific editorial process, in order to establish certain important premises for his work and to indicate some guidelines to encourage the improvement of the evaluations. Aiming that purpose, a specific bibliographic reference will be used, grounded on empirical research whenever possible, as well as perceptions of experience as author, reviewer and editor. In this sense, the paper will be structured in three parts: (I) definition and characteristics of peer review; (II) premises of the reviewer’s performance; and, (III) guidelines for consistent review. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_ddce1cdfde967ca91472e0787d290dac |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/70 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Editorial: Peer review and the reviewer’s role – principles and alignments to an effective reviewEditorial: Controle por pares e a função do revisor – premissas e orientações para uma avaliação consistenteEditorialpeer reviewreviewerreviewevaluation.Editorialcontrole por paresrevisorpareceravaliação.Continuing with the analysis of the phases and roles of the scientific editorial process’ actors, this editorial intends to explore the fundamental characteristics of "peer review" and, consequently, of the reviewer in the production of knowledge in scientific journals. Thus, it is intended to analyze the position and role of the reviewer in the scientific editorial process, in order to establish certain important premises for his work and to indicate some guidelines to encourage the improvement of the evaluations. Aiming that purpose, a specific bibliographic reference will be used, grounded on empirical research whenever possible, as well as perceptions of experience as author, reviewer and editor. In this sense, the paper will be structured in three parts: (I) definition and characteristics of peer review; (II) premises of the reviewer’s performance; and, (III) guidelines for consistent review.Continuando com a análise das fases e dos papeis dos atores do processo editorial científico, este editorial pretende explorar as características fundamentais do “controle por pares” e, consequentemente, do revisor na produção do conhecimento em revistas científicas. Assim, pretende-se analisar a posição e a função do revisor no processo editorial científico para, então, assentar certas premissas importantes para sua atuação e indicar algumas orientações para fomentar o aprimoramento das avaliações realizadas. Para tanto, utilizar-se-á referencial bibliográfico específico e embasado em pesquisas empíricas sempre que possível, mas também percepções de experiência como autor, revisor e editor. Nesse sentido, o texto se estruturará em três partes: (I) definição e características do controle por pares; (II) premissas de atuação do revisor; e, (III) orientações para redação de pareceres consistentes.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2017-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/7010.22197/rbdpp.v3i2.70Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017); 437-458Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2017); 437-458Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 2 (2017); 437-458Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 2 (2017); 437-4582525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/70/70https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/70/255Copyright (c) 2017 Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de2020-09-29T10:19:34Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/70Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2020-09-29T10:19:34Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Editorial: Peer review and the reviewer’s role – principles and alignments to an effective review Editorial: Controle por pares e a função do revisor – premissas e orientações para uma avaliação consistente |
title |
Editorial: Peer review and the reviewer’s role – principles and alignments to an effective review |
spellingShingle |
Editorial: Peer review and the reviewer’s role – principles and alignments to an effective review Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de Editorial peer review reviewer review evaluation. Editorial controle por pares revisor parecer avaliação. |
title_short |
Editorial: Peer review and the reviewer’s role – principles and alignments to an effective review |
title_full |
Editorial: Peer review and the reviewer’s role – principles and alignments to an effective review |
title_fullStr |
Editorial: Peer review and the reviewer’s role – principles and alignments to an effective review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Editorial: Peer review and the reviewer’s role – principles and alignments to an effective review |
title_sort |
Editorial: Peer review and the reviewer’s role – principles and alignments to an effective review |
author |
Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de |
author_facet |
Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Editorial peer review reviewer review evaluation. Editorial controle por pares revisor parecer avaliação. |
topic |
Editorial peer review reviewer review evaluation. Editorial controle por pares revisor parecer avaliação. |
description |
Continuing with the analysis of the phases and roles of the scientific editorial process’ actors, this editorial intends to explore the fundamental characteristics of "peer review" and, consequently, of the reviewer in the production of knowledge in scientific journals. Thus, it is intended to analyze the position and role of the reviewer in the scientific editorial process, in order to establish certain important premises for his work and to indicate some guidelines to encourage the improvement of the evaluations. Aiming that purpose, a specific bibliographic reference will be used, grounded on empirical research whenever possible, as well as perceptions of experience as author, reviewer and editor. In this sense, the paper will be structured in three parts: (I) definition and characteristics of peer review; (II) premises of the reviewer’s performance; and, (III) guidelines for consistent review. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/70 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2.70 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/70 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2.70 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/70/70 https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/70/255 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017); 437-458 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2017); 437-458 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 2 (2017); 437-458 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 2 (2017); 437-458 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281939899678720 |