Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wachholz,Patrick Alexander
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ggaging.com/details/570
Resumo: <p>Peer review is an essential and integral part of the editorial and academic publication process that contributes to validate manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. A good review can greatly improve the quality of published manuscripts, thereby improving the journal’s reputation, value, and relevance to the reader. This special article includes the main recommendations of the editorial board of <i>Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging</i> to its current and future reviewers, aiming at a continuous improvement of quality standards in the peer review process used by the journal. In addition, the importance and types of review processes are discussed, as well as the editorial flow and selection of reviewers, and general and specific recommendations are presented for carrying out good reviews.</p>
id SBGG_4c139eb7d6d05d017c7295986397bc60
oai_identifier_str oai:ggaging.com:570
network_acronym_str SBGG
network_name_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewerspeer review electronic journals ethical review.<p>Peer review is an essential and integral part of the editorial and academic publication process that contributes to validate manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. A good review can greatly improve the quality of published manuscripts, thereby improving the journal’s reputation, value, and relevance to the reader. This special article includes the main recommendations of the editorial board of <i>Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging</i> to its current and future reviewers, aiming at a continuous improvement of quality standards in the peer review process used by the journal. In addition, the importance and types of review processes are discussed, as well as the editorial flow and selection of reviewers, and general and specific recommendations are presented for carrying out good reviews.</p>Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttps://ggaging.com/details/570Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.13 n.4 2019reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstacron:SBGG10.5327/Z2447-211520191900066info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Wachholz,Patrick Alexandereng2019-10-01T00:00:00Zoai:ggaging.com:570Revistahttp://sbgg.org.br/publicacoes-cientificas/revista-geriatria-gerontologia/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpexecutiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br2447-21232447-2115opendoar:2019-10-01T00:00Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewers
title Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewers
spellingShingle Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewers
Wachholz,Patrick Alexander
peer review
electronic journals
ethical review.
title_short Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewers
title_full Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewers
title_fullStr Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewers
title_full_unstemmed Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewers
title_sort Improving the quality of peer review: GGA instructions for reviewers
author Wachholz,Patrick Alexander
author_facet Wachholz,Patrick Alexander
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wachholz,Patrick Alexander
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv peer review
electronic journals
ethical review.
topic peer review
electronic journals
ethical review.
description <p>Peer review is an essential and integral part of the editorial and academic publication process that contributes to validate manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. A good review can greatly improve the quality of published manuscripts, thereby improving the journal’s reputation, value, and relevance to the reader. This special article includes the main recommendations of the editorial board of <i>Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging</i> to its current and future reviewers, aiming at a continuous improvement of quality standards in the peer review process used by the journal. In addition, the importance and types of review processes are discussed, as well as the editorial flow and selection of reviewers, and general and specific recommendations are presented for carrying out good reviews.</p>
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ggaging.com/details/570
url https://ggaging.com/details/570
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5327/Z2447-211520191900066
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging v.13 n.4 2019
reponame:Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron:SBGG
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instacron_str SBGG
institution SBGG
reponame_str Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
collection Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv executiveditors@ggaging.com||nacional@sbgg.org.br
_version_ 1797174502500597760

Registros relacionados