Pre-trial incarceration in the coronavirus pandemic (Sars-CoV-2) in the jurisprudence of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : preventive detention as the ultima ratio?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ryu, Daiana Santos
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/628
Resumo: Considering the pandemic context and the need to adopt policies to fight the dissemination of the coronavirus in prison, the National Council of Justice issued Recommendation No. 62/2020. Among the measures described there, there is the recommendation to magistrates to observe, with greater rigor, the exceptionality of preventive detention. Given this situation, this study aims to analyze the application of such a recommendation by the Judiciary in this pandemic context. Therefore, decisions issued by the Superior Court of Justice, from 01.01.2021 to 07.01.2021, are analyzed in order to answer the following question: in times of pandemic, has preventive detention been treated as an ultima ratio by the STJ? In view of the data presents by this empirical research, it is concluded that, in reality, the prison policy proposed by the CNJ has not been observed, having been verified its relativization by this Superior Court even in cases where, in theory, it would be enough the application of less burdensome precautionary measures.
id IBRASPP-1_e2c2970cd385c957ebb1862c885b0987
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/628
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Pre-trial incarceration in the coronavirus pandemic (Sars-CoV-2) in the jurisprudence of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : preventive detention as the ultima ratio?Encarceramento provisório na pandemia do coronavírus (Sars-CoV-2) na jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : prisão preventiva como ultima ratio? prisão preventivapandemiaexcepcionalidadepreventive detentionexceptionalitypandemicConsidering the pandemic context and the need to adopt policies to fight the dissemination of the coronavirus in prison, the National Council of Justice issued Recommendation No. 62/2020. Among the measures described there, there is the recommendation to magistrates to observe, with greater rigor, the exceptionality of preventive detention. Given this situation, this study aims to analyze the application of such a recommendation by the Judiciary in this pandemic context. Therefore, decisions issued by the Superior Court of Justice, from 01.01.2021 to 07.01.2021, are analyzed in order to answer the following question: in times of pandemic, has preventive detention been treated as an ultima ratio by the STJ? In view of the data presents by this empirical research, it is concluded that, in reality, the prison policy proposed by the CNJ has not been observed, having been verified its relativization by this Superior Court even in cases where, in theory, it would be enough the application of less burdensome precautionary measures.Considerando-se o contexto pandêmico e a necessidade de adoção de políticas de enfrentamento à disseminação do coronavírus no cárcere, o Conselho Nacional de Justiça editou a Recomendação nº 62/2020. Entre as medidas ali descritas, está a recomendação aos/às magistrados/as que observem, com maior rigor, a excepcionalidade da prisão preventiva. Diante de tal quadro, o presente estudo visa analisar a aplicação de tal recomendação pelo Poder Judiciário neste contexto pandêmico. Para tanto, são analisadas decisões proferidas pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça, no período de 01.01.2021 a 01.07.2021, visando-se responder à seguinte pergunta: nos tempos pandemia, a prisão preventiva tem sido tratada como ultima ratio pelo STJ? Diante dos dados apresentados pela pesquisa empírica aqui trazida, conclui-se que, na realidade, a política carcerária proposta pelo CNJ não tem sido observada, tendo sido verificada sua relativização por tal Tribunal Superior até mesmo nos casos em que, em tese, caberia a aplicação de medidas cautelares menos gravosas.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2022-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/62810.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.628Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2022)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 8 N. 1 (2022)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 8 n. 1 (2022)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/628/442Copyright (c) 2022 Daiana Santos Ryuhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRyu, Daiana Santos2022-06-28T13:26:21Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/628Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2022-06-28T13:26:21Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pre-trial incarceration in the coronavirus pandemic (Sars-CoV-2) in the jurisprudence of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : preventive detention as the ultima ratio?
Encarceramento provisório na pandemia do coronavírus (Sars-CoV-2) na jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : prisão preventiva como ultima ratio?
title Pre-trial incarceration in the coronavirus pandemic (Sars-CoV-2) in the jurisprudence of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : preventive detention as the ultima ratio?
spellingShingle Pre-trial incarceration in the coronavirus pandemic (Sars-CoV-2) in the jurisprudence of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : preventive detention as the ultima ratio?
Ryu, Daiana Santos
prisão preventiva
pandemia
excepcionalidade
preventive detention
exceptionality
pandemic
title_short Pre-trial incarceration in the coronavirus pandemic (Sars-CoV-2) in the jurisprudence of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : preventive detention as the ultima ratio?
title_full Pre-trial incarceration in the coronavirus pandemic (Sars-CoV-2) in the jurisprudence of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : preventive detention as the ultima ratio?
title_fullStr Pre-trial incarceration in the coronavirus pandemic (Sars-CoV-2) in the jurisprudence of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : preventive detention as the ultima ratio?
title_full_unstemmed Pre-trial incarceration in the coronavirus pandemic (Sars-CoV-2) in the jurisprudence of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : preventive detention as the ultima ratio?
title_sort Pre-trial incarceration in the coronavirus pandemic (Sars-CoV-2) in the jurisprudence of the Superior Tribunal de Justiça: : preventive detention as the ultima ratio?
author Ryu, Daiana Santos
author_facet Ryu, Daiana Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ryu, Daiana Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv prisão preventiva
pandemia
excepcionalidade
preventive detention
exceptionality
pandemic
topic prisão preventiva
pandemia
excepcionalidade
preventive detention
exceptionality
pandemic
description Considering the pandemic context and the need to adopt policies to fight the dissemination of the coronavirus in prison, the National Council of Justice issued Recommendation No. 62/2020. Among the measures described there, there is the recommendation to magistrates to observe, with greater rigor, the exceptionality of preventive detention. Given this situation, this study aims to analyze the application of such a recommendation by the Judiciary in this pandemic context. Therefore, decisions issued by the Superior Court of Justice, from 01.01.2021 to 07.01.2021, are analyzed in order to answer the following question: in times of pandemic, has preventive detention been treated as an ultima ratio by the STJ? In view of the data presents by this empirical research, it is concluded that, in reality, the prison policy proposed by the CNJ has not been observed, having been verified its relativization by this Superior Court even in cases where, in theory, it would be enough the application of less burdensome precautionary measures.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/628
10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.628
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/628
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.628
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/628/442
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Daiana Santos Ryu
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Daiana Santos Ryu
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022)
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2022)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 8 N. 1 (2022)
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 8 n. 1 (2022)
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329402866532352

Registros relacionados