Preventive detention and standards of proof: proposals for the Brazilian criminal procedure

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Badaró Massena, Caio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/617
Resumo: Based on recent discussions regarding legal epistemology, this paper intends to investigate and propose standards of proof for the decision that decrees preventive detention of the accused in the Brazilian criminal procedure. With this objective, the first part will answer the following questions: why use standards of proof and how to formulate a standard of proof. Next, it will analyze the relationship between procedural technique of cognition and standards of proof and will explain the factual-legal structure of the judicial decision on personal precautionary measures. Finally, based on these theoretical contributions, alongside the analysis of concepts used by the legislator and the interpretation given by legal scholarship to legal provisions, the study will propose standards of proof for both fumus comissi delicti and periculum liberatis. The methodology used throughout the study will be the analysis of bibliography on legal epistemology and criminal procedural law.
id IBRASPP-1_df8a80a695852011b88811ba02d3b76e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/617
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Preventive detention and standards of proof: proposals for the Brazilian criminal procedurePrisão preventiva e standards de prova: propostas para o processo penal brasileirostandard of proofpreventive detentioncriminal evidencelegal epistemology.standard de provaprisão preventivaprova penalepistemologia jurídica.Based on recent discussions regarding legal epistemology, this paper intends to investigate and propose standards of proof for the decision that decrees preventive detention of the accused in the Brazilian criminal procedure. With this objective, the first part will answer the following questions: why use standards of proof and how to formulate a standard of proof. Next, it will analyze the relationship between procedural technique of cognition and standards of proof and will explain the factual-legal structure of the judicial decision on personal precautionary measures. Finally, based on these theoretical contributions, alongside the analysis of concepts used by the legislator and the interpretation given by legal scholarship to legal provisions, the study will propose standards of proof for both fumus comissi delicti and periculum liberatis. The methodology used throughout the study will be the analysis of bibliography on legal epistemology and criminal procedural law.A partir das recentes discussões no âmbito da epistemologia jurídica, o presente trabalho pretende investigar e propor standards de prova para a decisão que decreta a prisão preventiva do imputado no processo penal brasileiro. Com este objetivo, na primeira parte responderá aos seguintes questionamentos: por que utilizar standards de prova e como formular um standard de prova. A seguir, analisará a relação entre a técnica processual de cognição e os standards probatórios e explicitará a estrutura fático-legal da decisão judicial sobre medidas cautelares pessoais. Finalmente, a partir destes aportes teóricos, somados à análise dos conceitos utilizados pelo legislador e da interpretação dada pela processualística penal brasileira aos dispositivos legais, o estudo proporá standards de prova tanto para o fumus comissi delicti quanto para o periculum libertatis. A metodologia utilizada ao longo do trabalho será a revisão bibliográfica de estudos sobre epistemologia jurídica e direito processual penal.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2021-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/61710.22197/rbdpp.v7i3.617Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021); 1631Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 3 (2021); 1631Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 3 (2021); 1631Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 3 (2021); 16312525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v7i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/617/408Copyright (c) 2021 Caio Badaró Massenainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBadaró Massena, Caio2021-10-31T08:00:40Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/617Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2021-10-31T08:00:40Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Preventive detention and standards of proof: proposals for the Brazilian criminal procedure
Prisão preventiva e standards de prova: propostas para o processo penal brasileiro
title Preventive detention and standards of proof: proposals for the Brazilian criminal procedure
spellingShingle Preventive detention and standards of proof: proposals for the Brazilian criminal procedure
Badaró Massena, Caio
standard of proof
preventive detention
criminal evidence
legal epistemology.
standard de prova
prisão preventiva
prova penal
epistemologia jurídica.
title_short Preventive detention and standards of proof: proposals for the Brazilian criminal procedure
title_full Preventive detention and standards of proof: proposals for the Brazilian criminal procedure
title_fullStr Preventive detention and standards of proof: proposals for the Brazilian criminal procedure
title_full_unstemmed Preventive detention and standards of proof: proposals for the Brazilian criminal procedure
title_sort Preventive detention and standards of proof: proposals for the Brazilian criminal procedure
author Badaró Massena, Caio
author_facet Badaró Massena, Caio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Badaró Massena, Caio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv standard of proof
preventive detention
criminal evidence
legal epistemology.
standard de prova
prisão preventiva
prova penal
epistemologia jurídica.
topic standard of proof
preventive detention
criminal evidence
legal epistemology.
standard de prova
prisão preventiva
prova penal
epistemologia jurídica.
description Based on recent discussions regarding legal epistemology, this paper intends to investigate and propose standards of proof for the decision that decrees preventive detention of the accused in the Brazilian criminal procedure. With this objective, the first part will answer the following questions: why use standards of proof and how to formulate a standard of proof. Next, it will analyze the relationship between procedural technique of cognition and standards of proof and will explain the factual-legal structure of the judicial decision on personal precautionary measures. Finally, based on these theoretical contributions, alongside the analysis of concepts used by the legislator and the interpretation given by legal scholarship to legal provisions, the study will propose standards of proof for both fumus comissi delicti and periculum liberatis. The methodology used throughout the study will be the analysis of bibliography on legal epistemology and criminal procedural law.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/617
10.22197/rbdpp.v7i3.617
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/617
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v7i3.617
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/617/408
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Caio Badaró Massena
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Caio Badaró Massena
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021); 1631
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 3 (2021); 1631
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 3 (2021); 1631
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 3 (2021); 1631
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v7i3
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1798329402849755136

Registros relacionados