The custody of chain and the COAF/UIF’s financial intelligence report: repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP in the evidentiary scope
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/874 |
Resumo: | This article aims to analyze the probative repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP, within the scope of sharing the COAF financial intelligence report. The research is of a qualitative nature and the methodology consists of a hypothetical-deductive method, through a bibliographic review of authors who deal with criminal procedural law, financial intelligence and data protection. In conclusion, it was determined that the appeal judged by the Brazilian Supreme Court imposes compliance with the chain of custody for the legality of sharing the financial intelligence report, under the chance of inadmissibility of the report in the process. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_e6247b4324e099da9913f516e7121c18 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/874 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The custody of chain and the COAF/UIF’s financial intelligence report: repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP in the evidentiary scopeA cadeia de custódia da prova e o relatório de inteligência financeira do COAF/UIF: repercussões do Recurso Extraordinário nº 1.055.941/SP no âmbito probatórioCadeia de custódia; relatório de inteligência financeira; meio de obtenção de prova; proteção de dados pessoais; autodeterminação informativaChain of custody; Financial intelligence report; means of obtaining evidence; data protection; informational self-determinationThis article aims to analyze the probative repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP, within the scope of sharing the COAF financial intelligence report. The research is of a qualitative nature and the methodology consists of a hypothetical-deductive method, through a bibliographic review of authors who deal with criminal procedural law, financial intelligence and data protection. In conclusion, it was determined that the appeal judged by the Brazilian Supreme Court imposes compliance with the chain of custody for the legality of sharing the financial intelligence report, under the chance of inadmissibility of the report in the process.O presente estudo tem como objetivo analisar as repercussões probatórias do Recurso Extraordinário nº 1.055.941/SP, no âmbito do compartilhamento do relatório de inteligência financeira do COAF. A pesquisa é de natureza qualitativa e a metodologia utilizada consistiu em método hipotético-dedutivo, por meio da revisão bibliográfica de autores que versam sobre direito processual penal, inteligência financeira e proteção de dados. Concluiu-se, ao final, que a decisão proferida pela Corte Suprema brasileira impõe a observância da cadeia de custódia para legalidade do compartilhamento do relatório de inteligência financeira, sob pena de inadmissibilidade do relatório no processo.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2023-10-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/87410.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.874Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 3 (2023)Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 3 (2023)2525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/874/510Copyright (c) 2023 Matheus Oliveira Araújohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Matheus Oliveira2023-10-26T12:05:00Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/874Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2023-10-26T12:05Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The custody of chain and the COAF/UIF’s financial intelligence report: repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP in the evidentiary scope A cadeia de custódia da prova e o relatório de inteligência financeira do COAF/UIF: repercussões do Recurso Extraordinário nº 1.055.941/SP no âmbito probatório |
title |
The custody of chain and the COAF/UIF’s financial intelligence report: repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP in the evidentiary scope |
spellingShingle |
The custody of chain and the COAF/UIF’s financial intelligence report: repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP in the evidentiary scope Araújo, Matheus Oliveira Cadeia de custódia; relatório de inteligência financeira; meio de obtenção de prova; proteção de dados pessoais; autodeterminação informativa Chain of custody; Financial intelligence report; means of obtaining evidence; data protection; informational self-determination |
title_short |
The custody of chain and the COAF/UIF’s financial intelligence report: repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP in the evidentiary scope |
title_full |
The custody of chain and the COAF/UIF’s financial intelligence report: repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP in the evidentiary scope |
title_fullStr |
The custody of chain and the COAF/UIF’s financial intelligence report: repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP in the evidentiary scope |
title_full_unstemmed |
The custody of chain and the COAF/UIF’s financial intelligence report: repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP in the evidentiary scope |
title_sort |
The custody of chain and the COAF/UIF’s financial intelligence report: repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP in the evidentiary scope |
author |
Araújo, Matheus Oliveira |
author_facet |
Araújo, Matheus Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araújo, Matheus Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cadeia de custódia; relatório de inteligência financeira; meio de obtenção de prova; proteção de dados pessoais; autodeterminação informativa Chain of custody; Financial intelligence report; means of obtaining evidence; data protection; informational self-determination |
topic |
Cadeia de custódia; relatório de inteligência financeira; meio de obtenção de prova; proteção de dados pessoais; autodeterminação informativa Chain of custody; Financial intelligence report; means of obtaining evidence; data protection; informational self-determination |
description |
This article aims to analyze the probative repercussions of Extraordinary Appeal No. 1.055.941/SP, within the scope of sharing the COAF financial intelligence report. The research is of a qualitative nature and the methodology consists of a hypothetical-deductive method, through a bibliographic review of authors who deal with criminal procedural law, financial intelligence and data protection. In conclusion, it was determined that the appeal judged by the Brazilian Supreme Court imposes compliance with the chain of custody for the legality of sharing the financial intelligence report, under the chance of inadmissibility of the report in the process. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/874 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.874 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/874 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.874 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/874/510 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Matheus Oliveira Araújo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Matheus Oliveira Araújo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023) Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 9 Núm. 3 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 9 N. 3 (2023) Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 9 n. 3 (2023) 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281941783969792 |