The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/76 |
Resumo: | Due to technological advances, new means of obtaining information have been brought up to the field of criminal procedure, among them, the interception of telephone communication. Law 9.296/96 has introduced new actors on to the probative subsystem that play a direct part on the production/gathering of information that may be taken in consideration by the judge. The inexistence of proper procedural regulation that delimitates the manner in which such investigation must be carried out, the defense finds grave difficulty to try and trace the source of the proof. Fearing the risks associated with the production of defective evidence, the present study focuses on the importance of the chain of custody as a mean to track and assure the reliability of set information. With the purpose of knowing the rite to obtain the data through telephone interception and the verifying its credibility, a theoretical-bibliographic study was carried out and combined with an analysis of the statistics on means of investigation of proof provided by the CNJ and, finally, followed by an analysis of the technology systems developed to carry out the interception of communications measure. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_b9b1cf63d0381cec06851f291841582a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/76 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custodyO protagonismo dos sistemas de tecnologia da informação na interceptação telefônica: a importância da cadeia de custódiaTelephone interceptionatypical means of obtaining evidenceIT companieschain of custodysurveillance system.Interceptação das comunicaçõesmeios de obtenção de prova atípicossistemas de tecnologia da informaçãocadeia de custódiasistemas guardião e vigia.Due to technological advances, new means of obtaining information have been brought up to the field of criminal procedure, among them, the interception of telephone communication. Law 9.296/96 has introduced new actors on to the probative subsystem that play a direct part on the production/gathering of information that may be taken in consideration by the judge. The inexistence of proper procedural regulation that delimitates the manner in which such investigation must be carried out, the defense finds grave difficulty to try and trace the source of the proof. Fearing the risks associated with the production of defective evidence, the present study focuses on the importance of the chain of custody as a mean to track and assure the reliability of set information. With the purpose of knowing the rite to obtain the data through telephone interception and the verifying its credibility, a theoretical-bibliographic study was carried out and combined with an analysis of the statistics on means of investigation of proof provided by the CNJ and, finally, followed by an analysis of the technology systems developed to carry out the interception of communications measure.As mudanças tecnológicas levaram ao processo penal novas formas de obtenção de informações, dentre elas, a interceptação das comunicações telefônicas. A Lei no 9.296/96 introduziu, nesse subsistema probatório, novos atores, que não existiam no sistema penal tradicional, os quais interferem diretamente na produção da informação valorável pelo julgador. A lei é silente quanto à forma de execução da medida, bem como do rastreamento da informação, relegando tal tarefa às empresas de tecnologia da informação. Temendo os riscos associados a uma possível produção de evidências defeituosas, o presente trabalho versa sobre a importância da cadeia de custódia como garantia de rastreabilidade e fiabilidade. Com o intuito de conhecer o rito para obtenção da informação por meio da interceptação telefônica e da constatação a respeito de sua idoneidade, aliou-se um estudo teórico-bibliográfico à análise dos dados sobre esse meio de obtenção de prova fornecidos pelo CNJ, seguida de análise dos sistemas de tecnologia da informação desenvolvidos para execução da medida de interceptação das comunicações.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2017-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/7610.22197/rbdpp.v3i2.76Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017); 605-632Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2017); 605-632Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 2 (2017); 605-632Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 2 (2017); 605-6322525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/76/77Copyright (c) 2017 Antonio Eduardo Ramires Santoro, Natália Lucero Frias Tavares, Jefferson de Carvalho Gomesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantoro, Antonio Eduardo RamiresTavares, Natália Lucero FriasGomes, Jefferson de Carvalho2017-06-08T18:19:03Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/76Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2017-06-08T18:19:03Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody O protagonismo dos sistemas de tecnologia da informação na interceptação telefônica: a importância da cadeia de custódia |
title |
The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody |
spellingShingle |
The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody Santoro, Antonio Eduardo Ramires Telephone interception atypical means of obtaining evidence IT companies chain of custody surveillance system. Interceptação das comunicações meios de obtenção de prova atípicos sistemas de tecnologia da informação cadeia de custódia sistemas guardião e vigia. |
title_short |
The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody |
title_full |
The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody |
title_fullStr |
The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody |
title_full_unstemmed |
The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody |
title_sort |
The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody |
author |
Santoro, Antonio Eduardo Ramires |
author_facet |
Santoro, Antonio Eduardo Ramires Tavares, Natália Lucero Frias Gomes, Jefferson de Carvalho |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tavares, Natália Lucero Frias Gomes, Jefferson de Carvalho |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santoro, Antonio Eduardo Ramires Tavares, Natália Lucero Frias Gomes, Jefferson de Carvalho |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Telephone interception atypical means of obtaining evidence IT companies chain of custody surveillance system. Interceptação das comunicações meios de obtenção de prova atípicos sistemas de tecnologia da informação cadeia de custódia sistemas guardião e vigia. |
topic |
Telephone interception atypical means of obtaining evidence IT companies chain of custody surveillance system. Interceptação das comunicações meios de obtenção de prova atípicos sistemas de tecnologia da informação cadeia de custódia sistemas guardião e vigia. |
description |
Due to technological advances, new means of obtaining information have been brought up to the field of criminal procedure, among them, the interception of telephone communication. Law 9.296/96 has introduced new actors on to the probative subsystem that play a direct part on the production/gathering of information that may be taken in consideration by the judge. The inexistence of proper procedural regulation that delimitates the manner in which such investigation must be carried out, the defense finds grave difficulty to try and trace the source of the proof. Fearing the risks associated with the production of defective evidence, the present study focuses on the importance of the chain of custody as a mean to track and assure the reliability of set information. With the purpose of knowing the rite to obtain the data through telephone interception and the verifying its credibility, a theoretical-bibliographic study was carried out and combined with an analysis of the statistics on means of investigation of proof provided by the CNJ and, finally, followed by an analysis of the technology systems developed to carry out the interception of communications measure. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/76 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2.76 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/76 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2.76 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/76/77 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017); 605-632 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2017); 605-632 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 2 (2017); 605-632 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 2 (2017); 605-632 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281939905970176 |