The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santoro, Antonio Eduardo Ramires
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Tavares, Natália Lucero Frias, Gomes, Jefferson de Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/76
Resumo: Due to technological advances, new means of obtaining information have been brought up to the field of criminal procedure, among them, the interception of telephone communication. Law 9.296/96 has introduced new actors on to the probative subsystem that play a direct part on the production/gathering of information that may be taken in consideration by the judge. The inexistence of proper procedural regulation that delimitates the manner in which such investigation must be carried out, the defense finds grave difficulty to try and trace the source of the proof. Fearing the risks associated with the production of defective evidence, the present study focuses on the importance of the chain of custody as a mean to track and assure the reliability of set information. With the purpose of knowing the rite to obtain the data through telephone interception and the verifying its credibility, a theoretical-bibliographic study was carried out and combined with an analysis of the statistics on means of investigation of proof provided by the CNJ and, finally, followed by an analysis of the technology systems developed to carry out the interception of communications measure.
id IBRASPP-1_b9b1cf63d0381cec06851f291841582a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/76
network_acronym_str IBRASPP-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custodyO protagonismo dos sistemas de tecnologia da informação na interceptação telefônica: a importância da cadeia de custódiaTelephone interceptionatypical means of obtaining evidenceIT companieschain of custodysurveillance system.Interceptação das comunicaçõesmeios de obtenção de prova atípicossistemas de tecnologia da informaçãocadeia de custódiasistemas guardião e vigia.Due to technological advances, new means of obtaining information have been brought up to the field of criminal procedure, among them, the interception of telephone communication. Law 9.296/96 has introduced new actors on to the probative subsystem that play a direct part on the production/gathering of information that may be taken in consideration by the judge. The inexistence of proper procedural regulation that delimitates the manner in which such investigation must be carried out, the defense finds grave difficulty to try and trace the source of the proof. Fearing the risks associated with the production of defective evidence, the present study focuses on the importance of the chain of custody as a mean to track and assure the reliability of set information. With the purpose of knowing the rite to obtain the data through telephone interception and the verifying its credibility, a theoretical-bibliographic study was carried out and combined with an analysis of the statistics on means of investigation of proof provided by the CNJ and, finally, followed by an analysis of the technology systems developed to carry out the interception of communications measure.As mudanças tecnológicas levaram ao processo penal novas formas de obtenção de informações, dentre elas, a interceptação das comunicações telefônicas. A Lei no 9.296/96 introduziu, nesse subsistema probatório, novos atores, que não existiam no sistema penal tradicional, os quais interferem diretamente na produção da informação valorável pelo julgador. A lei é silente quanto à forma de execução da medida, bem como do rastreamento da informação, relegando tal tarefa às empresas de tecnologia da informação. Temendo os riscos associados a uma possível produção de evidências defeituosas, o presente trabalho versa sobre a importância da cadeia de custódia como garantia de rastreabilidade e fiabilidade. Com o intuito de conhecer o rito para obtenção da informação por meio da interceptação telefônica e da constatação a respeito de sua idoneidade, aliou-se um estudo teórico-bibliográfico à análise dos dados sobre esse meio de obtenção de prova fornecidos pelo CNJ, seguida de análise dos sistemas de tecnologia da informação desenvolvidos para execução da medida de interceptação das comunicações.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2017-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/7610.22197/rbdpp.v3i2.76Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017); 605-632Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2017); 605-632Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 2 (2017); 605-632Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 2 (2017); 605-6322525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/76/77Copyright (c) 2017 Antonio Eduardo Ramires Santoro, Natália Lucero Frias Tavares, Jefferson de Carvalho Gomesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantoro, Antonio Eduardo RamiresTavares, Natália Lucero FriasGomes, Jefferson de Carvalho2017-06-08T18:19:03Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/76Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2017-06-08T18:19:03Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody
O protagonismo dos sistemas de tecnologia da informação na interceptação telefônica: a importância da cadeia de custódia
title The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody
spellingShingle The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody
Santoro, Antonio Eduardo Ramires
Telephone interception
atypical means of obtaining evidence
IT companies
chain of custody
surveillance system.
Interceptação das comunicações
meios de obtenção de prova atípicos
sistemas de tecnologia da informação
cadeia de custódia
sistemas guardião e vigia.
title_short The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody
title_full The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody
title_fullStr The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody
title_full_unstemmed The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody
title_sort The protagonism of information technology systems in telephone interception: the importance of the chain of custody
author Santoro, Antonio Eduardo Ramires
author_facet Santoro, Antonio Eduardo Ramires
Tavares, Natália Lucero Frias
Gomes, Jefferson de Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Tavares, Natália Lucero Frias
Gomes, Jefferson de Carvalho
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santoro, Antonio Eduardo Ramires
Tavares, Natália Lucero Frias
Gomes, Jefferson de Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Telephone interception
atypical means of obtaining evidence
IT companies
chain of custody
surveillance system.
Interceptação das comunicações
meios de obtenção de prova atípicos
sistemas de tecnologia da informação
cadeia de custódia
sistemas guardião e vigia.
topic Telephone interception
atypical means of obtaining evidence
IT companies
chain of custody
surveillance system.
Interceptação das comunicações
meios de obtenção de prova atípicos
sistemas de tecnologia da informação
cadeia de custódia
sistemas guardião e vigia.
description Due to technological advances, new means of obtaining information have been brought up to the field of criminal procedure, among them, the interception of telephone communication. Law 9.296/96 has introduced new actors on to the probative subsystem that play a direct part on the production/gathering of information that may be taken in consideration by the judge. The inexistence of proper procedural regulation that delimitates the manner in which such investigation must be carried out, the defense finds grave difficulty to try and trace the source of the proof. Fearing the risks associated with the production of defective evidence, the present study focuses on the importance of the chain of custody as a mean to track and assure the reliability of set information. With the purpose of knowing the rite to obtain the data through telephone interception and the verifying its credibility, a theoretical-bibliographic study was carried out and combined with an analysis of the statistics on means of investigation of proof provided by the CNJ and, finally, followed by an analysis of the technology systems developed to carry out the interception of communications measure.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/76
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2.76
url https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/76
identifier_str_mv 10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2.76
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/76/77
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2017); 605-632
Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2017); 605-632
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 3 N. 2 (2017); 605-632
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 3 n. 2 (2017); 605-632
2525-510X
10.22197/rbdpp.v3i2
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron:IBRASPP
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
instacron_str IBRASPP
institution IBRASPP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ibraspp.com.br
_version_ 1809281939905970176