Virtual jury court: seeking harmonization between the emergency solutions caused by the pandemic of the new coronavirus and the observance of constitutional precepts
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/439 |
Resumo: | The Brazilian Judiciary has sought to promote the appropriate adaptations to the changes caused by the new coronavirus (Sars-CoV-2), with the holding of hearings and several other procedural acts, using videoconferencing instruments. This article addresses the proposal of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) for virtualization, during that period, of the sessions of the jury court, in the light of the constitutional precepts on the matter. The problematization focuses on the search for harmonization between the emergency solutions that arose in the pandemic context with the guidelines included in Recommendation nº 62/2020 of the referred internal control body of the Judiciary. Various issues are discussed, with emphasis on the constitutional debate, on criteria related to the jury's court, such as the argumentative prejudice, the prominence of the special procedure and the applicability of the legal provisions of videoconferencing to the rite under analysis, in addition to those related to secrecy of the votes and the incommunicability of the jurors, with notes for not incarceration measures. Based on a methodology based on a review of specialized literature, with a qualitative approach, a critical judgment is formulated about the constitutionality of the intention to virtualize the jury's special procedure, a proposal that took place especially under the adequate pretext of effect of the constitutional principle of reasonable duration of the process. |
id |
IBRASPP-1_f44f1dda8623a052231d6685b2d26e24 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/439 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRASPP-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Virtual jury court: seeking harmonization between the emergency solutions caused by the pandemic of the new coronavirus and the observance of constitutional preceptsTribunal do júri virtual: em busca da harmonização entre as soluções emergenciais ocasionadas pela pandemia do novo coronavirus e a observância dos preceitos constitucionaisJury courtVirtualizationPandemic of the new coronavirusVideo conferenceVirtual jury.Tribunal do júriVirtualizaçãoPandemia do novo coronavírusVideoconferênciaJúri virtual.The Brazilian Judiciary has sought to promote the appropriate adaptations to the changes caused by the new coronavirus (Sars-CoV-2), with the holding of hearings and several other procedural acts, using videoconferencing instruments. This article addresses the proposal of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) for virtualization, during that period, of the sessions of the jury court, in the light of the constitutional precepts on the matter. The problematization focuses on the search for harmonization between the emergency solutions that arose in the pandemic context with the guidelines included in Recommendation nº 62/2020 of the referred internal control body of the Judiciary. Various issues are discussed, with emphasis on the constitutional debate, on criteria related to the jury's court, such as the argumentative prejudice, the prominence of the special procedure and the applicability of the legal provisions of videoconferencing to the rite under analysis, in addition to those related to secrecy of the votes and the incommunicability of the jurors, with notes for not incarceration measures. Based on a methodology based on a review of specialized literature, with a qualitative approach, a critical judgment is formulated about the constitutionality of the intention to virtualize the jury's special procedure, a proposal that took place especially under the adequate pretext of effect of the constitutional principle of reasonable duration of the process.O Poder Judiciário brasileiro tem buscado promover as devidas adequações às mudanças causadas pelo novo coronavírus (Sars-CoV-2), com a realização de audiências e diversos outros atos processuais, mediante instrumentos de videoconferência. Este artigo aborda a proposta do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ) de virtualização, nesse período, das sessões do tribunal do júri, à luz dos preceitos constitucionais sobre a matéria. A problematização centra-se na busca pela harmonização entre as soluções emergenciais surgidas no contexto pandêmico com as diretrizes encartadas na Recomendação nº 62/2020 do referido órgão de controle interno do Poder Judiciário. Discutem-se questões variadas, com ênfase no debate constitucional, sobre critérios afetos ao tribunal do júri, como o prejuízo argumentativo, a proeminência do procedimento especial e a aplicabilidade das disposições legais de videoconferência ao rito sob análise, além daquelas atinentes ao sigilo das votações e da incomunicabilidade dos jurados, com apontamentos para medidas desencarceradoras. A partir de metodologia fundada em revisão de literatura especializada, com abordagem qualitativa, formula-se um juízo crítico acerca da inconstitucionalidade da pretensão de virtualização do procedimento especial do júri, proposta que se deu especialmente sob o pretexto inadequado de efetivação do princípio constitucional da razoável duração do processo.Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP2021-03-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/43910.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.439Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021); 475Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2021); 475Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 1 (2021); 475Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 1 (2021); 4752525-510X10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)instacron:IBRASPPporhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/439/337https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/439/358Copyright (c) 2021 RONALD PINHEIRO RODRIGUES, NIGEL STEWART NEVES PATRIOTA MALTAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues, Ronald PinheiroMalta, Nigel Stewart Neves Patriota2021-05-03T10:29:02Zoai:ojs.revista.ibraspp.com.br:article/439Revistahttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPPONGhttps://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/oairevista@ibraspp.com.br2525-510X2359-3881opendoar:2021-05-03T10:29:02Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Virtual jury court: seeking harmonization between the emergency solutions caused by the pandemic of the new coronavirus and the observance of constitutional precepts Tribunal do júri virtual: em busca da harmonização entre as soluções emergenciais ocasionadas pela pandemia do novo coronavirus e a observância dos preceitos constitucionais |
title |
Virtual jury court: seeking harmonization between the emergency solutions caused by the pandemic of the new coronavirus and the observance of constitutional precepts |
spellingShingle |
Virtual jury court: seeking harmonization between the emergency solutions caused by the pandemic of the new coronavirus and the observance of constitutional precepts Rodrigues, Ronald Pinheiro Jury court Virtualization Pandemic of the new coronavirus Video conference Virtual jury. Tribunal do júri Virtualização Pandemia do novo coronavírus Videoconferência Júri virtual. |
title_short |
Virtual jury court: seeking harmonization between the emergency solutions caused by the pandemic of the new coronavirus and the observance of constitutional precepts |
title_full |
Virtual jury court: seeking harmonization between the emergency solutions caused by the pandemic of the new coronavirus and the observance of constitutional precepts |
title_fullStr |
Virtual jury court: seeking harmonization between the emergency solutions caused by the pandemic of the new coronavirus and the observance of constitutional precepts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Virtual jury court: seeking harmonization between the emergency solutions caused by the pandemic of the new coronavirus and the observance of constitutional precepts |
title_sort |
Virtual jury court: seeking harmonization between the emergency solutions caused by the pandemic of the new coronavirus and the observance of constitutional precepts |
author |
Rodrigues, Ronald Pinheiro |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Ronald Pinheiro Malta, Nigel Stewart Neves Patriota |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Malta, Nigel Stewart Neves Patriota |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Ronald Pinheiro Malta, Nigel Stewart Neves Patriota |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Jury court Virtualization Pandemic of the new coronavirus Video conference Virtual jury. Tribunal do júri Virtualização Pandemia do novo coronavírus Videoconferência Júri virtual. |
topic |
Jury court Virtualization Pandemic of the new coronavirus Video conference Virtual jury. Tribunal do júri Virtualização Pandemia do novo coronavírus Videoconferência Júri virtual. |
description |
The Brazilian Judiciary has sought to promote the appropriate adaptations to the changes caused by the new coronavirus (Sars-CoV-2), with the holding of hearings and several other procedural acts, using videoconferencing instruments. This article addresses the proposal of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) for virtualization, during that period, of the sessions of the jury court, in the light of the constitutional precepts on the matter. The problematization focuses on the search for harmonization between the emergency solutions that arose in the pandemic context with the guidelines included in Recommendation nº 62/2020 of the referred internal control body of the Judiciary. Various issues are discussed, with emphasis on the constitutional debate, on criteria related to the jury's court, such as the argumentative prejudice, the prominence of the special procedure and the applicability of the legal provisions of videoconferencing to the rite under analysis, in addition to those related to secrecy of the votes and the incommunicability of the jurors, with notes for not incarceration measures. Based on a methodology based on a review of specialized literature, with a qualitative approach, a critical judgment is formulated about the constitutionality of the intention to virtualize the jury's special procedure, a proposal that took place especially under the adequate pretext of effect of the constitutional principle of reasonable duration of the process. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/439 10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.439 |
url |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/439 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.439 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/439/337 https://revista.ibraspp.com.br/RBDPP/article/view/439/358 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 RONALD PINHEIRO RODRIGUES, NIGEL STEWART NEVES PATRIOTA MALTA info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 RONALD PINHEIRO RODRIGUES, NIGEL STEWART NEVES PATRIOTA MALTA |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal - IBRASPP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021); 475 Revista Brasileña de Derecho Procesal Penal; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2021); 475 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; V. 7 N. 1 (2021); 475 Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal; v. 7 n. 1 (2021); 475 2525-510X 10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) instacron:IBRASPP |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
instacron_str |
IBRASPP |
institution |
IBRASPP |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (IBRASPP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ibraspp.com.br |
_version_ |
1809281941058355200 |