International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000100215 |
Resumo: | Abstract Development thinking has been progressively dominated by neo-institutionalism, influencing major donors in Africa, and recently included in the UN 2030 Agenda for development. This paper discusses some unintended impacts of such strategies in neo-patrimonial regimes such as Angola and Mozambique, whereby neo-institutionalism favoured donors' apolitical “partnership” with resilient neo-patrimonial structures, facilitating its recycling, sophistication, and modernization, taking advantage of financial globalization to its own ends and improving its democratic image through elections, but leaving untouched the principles of neo-patrimonial political management for a minority to hold on to power since independence. Theoretically, this approach contrasts with varieties of democracy and varieties of capitalism perspectives. |
id |
IBRI-1_0f4cf2e04b78327d34d4cbed3b216e16 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-73292018000100215 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRI-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and MozambiqueDevelopment strategiesNeo-institutionalismNeo-patrimonialismAngolaMozambiqueAbstract Development thinking has been progressively dominated by neo-institutionalism, influencing major donors in Africa, and recently included in the UN 2030 Agenda for development. This paper discusses some unintended impacts of such strategies in neo-patrimonial regimes such as Angola and Mozambique, whereby neo-institutionalism favoured donors' apolitical “partnership” with resilient neo-patrimonial structures, facilitating its recycling, sophistication, and modernization, taking advantage of financial globalization to its own ends and improving its democratic image through elections, but leaving untouched the principles of neo-patrimonial political management for a minority to hold on to power since independence. Theoretically, this approach contrasts with varieties of democracy and varieties of capitalism perspectives.Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000100215Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.61 n.1 2018reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)instacron:IBRI10.1590/0034-7329201800115info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVidal,Nuno De Fragosoeng2019-01-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-73292018000100215Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbpihttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org1983-31210034-7329opendoar:2019-01-22T00:00Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique |
title |
International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique |
spellingShingle |
International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique Vidal,Nuno De Fragoso Development strategies Neo-institutionalism Neo-patrimonialism Angola Mozambique |
title_short |
International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique |
title_full |
International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique |
title_fullStr |
International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique |
title_full_unstemmed |
International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique |
title_sort |
International development strategies for the XXIst century and post-modern patrimonialism in Africa – Angola and Mozambique |
author |
Vidal,Nuno De Fragoso |
author_facet |
Vidal,Nuno De Fragoso |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vidal,Nuno De Fragoso |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Development strategies Neo-institutionalism Neo-patrimonialism Angola Mozambique |
topic |
Development strategies Neo-institutionalism Neo-patrimonialism Angola Mozambique |
description |
Abstract Development thinking has been progressively dominated by neo-institutionalism, influencing major donors in Africa, and recently included in the UN 2030 Agenda for development. This paper discusses some unintended impacts of such strategies in neo-patrimonial regimes such as Angola and Mozambique, whereby neo-institutionalism favoured donors' apolitical “partnership” with resilient neo-patrimonial structures, facilitating its recycling, sophistication, and modernization, taking advantage of financial globalization to its own ends and improving its democratic image through elections, but leaving untouched the principles of neo-patrimonial political management for a minority to hold on to power since independence. Theoretically, this approach contrasts with varieties of democracy and varieties of capitalism perspectives. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000100215 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000100215 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7329201800115 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.61 n.1 2018 reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) instacron:IBRI |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) |
instacron_str |
IBRI |
institution |
IBRI |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org |
_version_ |
1754193627523842048 |