Fighting climate change in the air: lessons from the EU directive on global aviation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Domingos,Nicole de Paula
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292012000300005
Resumo: The European Union's (EU) decision to include aviation into the Emissions Trade Scheme was heatedly contested. Countries around the world, but mainly the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa group (BRICS) and the US, denounced the EU's initiate as illegal and unilateral. Following a decade of frustrated negotiations at the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), this paper interrogates why such measure, in principle climate-friendly, inspired so much global resentment. I argue that concerns with competitiveness and risks of legal inconsistency are important, but insufficient elements to explain the core of the conflict. The paper suggests that the EU was strongly criticized because third countries perceived this action as an imposed solution, which fostered an environment of distrust. Therefore, I claim that the problem has more to do with a normative divide than with a substantive divergence on what should be done regarding aviation emissions. My analysis is informed by the present literature on the links between trade and climate change, but gives particular weight to first-hand information through interviews with key stakeholders. The paper is divided in three parts. First, it presents the scope of the EU directive in historical perspective. Second, it explores the EU's measure through three different angles: legal, economical and political. The final part explores some possible solutions to overcome these divergences.
id IBRI-1_b4060feebaee38c37826dcb4f27ccc51
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-73292012000300005
network_acronym_str IBRI-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Fighting climate change in the air: lessons from the EU directive on global aviationAviation Directiveclimate changeEuropean UnionThe European Union's (EU) decision to include aviation into the Emissions Trade Scheme was heatedly contested. Countries around the world, but mainly the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa group (BRICS) and the US, denounced the EU's initiate as illegal and unilateral. Following a decade of frustrated negotiations at the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), this paper interrogates why such measure, in principle climate-friendly, inspired so much global resentment. I argue that concerns with competitiveness and risks of legal inconsistency are important, but insufficient elements to explain the core of the conflict. The paper suggests that the EU was strongly criticized because third countries perceived this action as an imposed solution, which fostered an environment of distrust. Therefore, I claim that the problem has more to do with a normative divide than with a substantive divergence on what should be done regarding aviation emissions. My analysis is informed by the present literature on the links between trade and climate change, but gives particular weight to first-hand information through interviews with key stakeholders. The paper is divided in three parts. First, it presents the scope of the EU directive in historical perspective. Second, it explores the EU's measure through three different angles: legal, economical and political. The final part explores some possible solutions to overcome these divergences.Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292012000300005Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.55 n.spe 2012reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)instacron:IBRI10.1590/S0034-73292012000300005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDomingos,Nicole de Paulaeng2013-01-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-73292012000300005Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbpihttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org1983-31210034-7329opendoar:2013-01-08T00:00Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fighting climate change in the air: lessons from the EU directive on global aviation
title Fighting climate change in the air: lessons from the EU directive on global aviation
spellingShingle Fighting climate change in the air: lessons from the EU directive on global aviation
Domingos,Nicole de Paula
Aviation Directive
climate change
European Union
title_short Fighting climate change in the air: lessons from the EU directive on global aviation
title_full Fighting climate change in the air: lessons from the EU directive on global aviation
title_fullStr Fighting climate change in the air: lessons from the EU directive on global aviation
title_full_unstemmed Fighting climate change in the air: lessons from the EU directive on global aviation
title_sort Fighting climate change in the air: lessons from the EU directive on global aviation
author Domingos,Nicole de Paula
author_facet Domingos,Nicole de Paula
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Domingos,Nicole de Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aviation Directive
climate change
European Union
topic Aviation Directive
climate change
European Union
description The European Union's (EU) decision to include aviation into the Emissions Trade Scheme was heatedly contested. Countries around the world, but mainly the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa group (BRICS) and the US, denounced the EU's initiate as illegal and unilateral. Following a decade of frustrated negotiations at the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), this paper interrogates why such measure, in principle climate-friendly, inspired so much global resentment. I argue that concerns with competitiveness and risks of legal inconsistency are important, but insufficient elements to explain the core of the conflict. The paper suggests that the EU was strongly criticized because third countries perceived this action as an imposed solution, which fostered an environment of distrust. Therefore, I claim that the problem has more to do with a normative divide than with a substantive divergence on what should be done regarding aviation emissions. My analysis is informed by the present literature on the links between trade and climate change, but gives particular weight to first-hand information through interviews with key stakeholders. The paper is divided in three parts. First, it presents the scope of the EU directive in historical perspective. Second, it explores the EU's measure through three different angles: legal, economical and political. The final part explores some possible solutions to overcome these divergences.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292012000300005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292012000300005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-73292012000300005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.55 n.spe 2012
reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)
instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)
instacron:IBRI
instname_str Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)
instacron_str IBRI
institution IBRI
reponame_str Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org
_version_ 1754193626735312896