Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000100202 |
Resumo: | Abstract This article assesses the normative resistance to Responsibility to Protect adopted by Brazil and Russia against the backdrop of their international identities and self-assigned roles in a changing global order. Drawing upon the framework of Bloomsfield’s norm dynamics role spectrum, it argues that while the ambiguous Russian role regarding this principle represents an example of ‘norm antipreneurship’, particularities of Brazil’s resistance are better grasped by a new category left unaccounted for by this model, which this study portrays as ‘contesting entrepreneur’. |
id |
IBRI-1_e3c9f644e8c1448e604be3c508976251 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-73292018000100202 |
network_acronym_str |
IBRI-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and RussiaNormative resistanceResponsibility to protectResponsibility while protectingBrazilian foreign policyRussian foreign policyUN Security CouncilAbstract This article assesses the normative resistance to Responsibility to Protect adopted by Brazil and Russia against the backdrop of their international identities and self-assigned roles in a changing global order. Drawing upon the framework of Bloomsfield’s norm dynamics role spectrum, it argues that while the ambiguous Russian role regarding this principle represents an example of ‘norm antipreneurship’, particularities of Brazil’s resistance are better grasped by a new category left unaccounted for by this model, which this study portrays as ‘contesting entrepreneur’.Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000100202Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.61 n.1 2018reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online)instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)instacron:IBRI10.1590/0034-7329201800101info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKotyashko,AnnaFerreira-Pereira,Laura CristinaVieira,Alena Vysotskaya Guedeseng2018-03-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-73292018000100202Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbpihttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org1983-31210034-7329opendoar:2018-03-29T00:00Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia |
title |
Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia |
spellingShingle |
Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia Kotyashko,Anna Normative resistance Responsibility to protect Responsibility while protecting Brazilian foreign policy Russian foreign policy UN Security Council |
title_short |
Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia |
title_full |
Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia |
title_fullStr |
Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia |
title_sort |
Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia |
author |
Kotyashko,Anna |
author_facet |
Kotyashko,Anna Ferreira-Pereira,Laura Cristina Vieira,Alena Vysotskaya Guedes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira-Pereira,Laura Cristina Vieira,Alena Vysotskaya Guedes |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kotyashko,Anna Ferreira-Pereira,Laura Cristina Vieira,Alena Vysotskaya Guedes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Normative resistance Responsibility to protect Responsibility while protecting Brazilian foreign policy Russian foreign policy UN Security Council |
topic |
Normative resistance Responsibility to protect Responsibility while protecting Brazilian foreign policy Russian foreign policy UN Security Council |
description |
Abstract This article assesses the normative resistance to Responsibility to Protect adopted by Brazil and Russia against the backdrop of their international identities and self-assigned roles in a changing global order. Drawing upon the framework of Bloomsfield’s norm dynamics role spectrum, it argues that while the ambiguous Russian role regarding this principle represents an example of ‘norm antipreneurship’, particularities of Brazil’s resistance are better grasped by a new category left unaccounted for by this model, which this study portrays as ‘contesting entrepreneur’. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000100202 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-73292018000100202 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7329201800101 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Globais da Universidade de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional v.61 n.1 2018 reponame:Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) instname:Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) instacron:IBRI |
instname_str |
Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) |
instacron_str |
IBRI |
institution |
IBRI |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de política internacional (Online) - Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais (IBRI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editoria@ibri-rbpi.org |
_version_ |
1754193627253309440 |